Richard V Lundell1,2,3, Olli Arola4, Jari Suvilehto5, Juha Kuokkanen5, Mika Valtonen4, Anne K Räisänen-Sokolowski2,5,6. 1. Diving Medical Centre, Centre for Military Medicine, Finnish Defence Forces, Helsinki, Finland. 2. Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Corresponding author: Sähkölaitoksentie 4, 00860 Helsinki, Finland, richard.lundell@fimnet.fi. 4. National Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Center, Intensive Care Unit, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. 5. Hyperbaric Center Medioxygen, Helsinki, Finland. 6. Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This is the first published study on decompression illness (DCI) and its treatment in Finland. Diving conditions are demanding, as even in the summer the water temperature below 20 meters' sea/fresh water (msw/mfw) is 4-10°C. Technical diving has become more popular over the years, so the emphasis of this study was to describe DCI in technical divers and compare it with non-technical recreational divers. METHODS: This study includes by estimation over 95% of all hyperbaric oxygen-treated DCI patients during the years 1999-2018 (n = 571). The cases were divided into technical divers (n = 200) and non-technical divers (n = 371). We focused on the differences between these two groups. Technical diving was defined as the usage of mixed breathing gases, closed circuit rebreather diving or planned decompression diving. RESULTS: The mean annual number of treated DCI cases in Finland was 29 (range 16-38). The number of divers treated possibly indicate a shift towards technical diving. Technical dives were deeper and longer and were mainly performed in cold water or an overhead environment. Technical divers were more likely to utilize first aid 100% oxygen (FAO2) and sought medical attention earlier than non-technical divers. Symptom profiles were similar in both groups. Recompression was performed using USN Treatment Table Six in the majority of the cases and resulted in good final outcome. Eighty two percent were asymptomatic on completion of all recompression treatment(s). CONCLUSION: This 20-year observational study indicates a shift towards technical diving, and hence a more demanding and challenging style of diving among Finnish divers, with a surprisingly constant number of DCI cases over the years. There is still need for improvement in divers' education in use of FAO2 for DCI symptoms. Fortunately, the outcome after recompression therapy is generally successful. Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.
INTRODUCTION: This is the first published study on decompression illness (DCI) and its treatment in Finland. Diving conditions are demanding, as even in the summer the water temperature below 20 meters' sea/fresh water (msw/mfw) is 4-10°C. Technical diving has become more popular over the years, so the emphasis of this study was to describe DCI in technical divers and compare it with non-technical recreational divers. METHODS: This study includes by estimation over 95% of all hyperbaric oxygen-treated DCI patients during the years 1999-2018 (n = 571). The cases were divided into technical divers (n = 200) and non-technical divers (n = 371). We focused on the differences between these two groups. Technical diving was defined as the usage of mixed breathing gases, closed circuit rebreather diving or planned decompression diving. RESULTS: The mean annual number of treated DCI cases in Finland was 29 (range 16-38). The number of divers treated possibly indicate a shift towards technical diving. Technical dives were deeper and longer and were mainly performed in cold water or an overhead environment. Technical divers were more likely to utilize first aid 100% oxygen (FAO2) and sought medical attention earlier than non-technical divers. Symptom profiles were similar in both groups. Recompression was performed using USN Treatment Table Six in the majority of the cases and resulted in good final outcome. Eighty two percent were asymptomatic on completion of all recompression treatment(s). CONCLUSION: This 20-year observational study indicates a shift towards technical diving, and hence a more demanding and challenging style of diving among Finnish divers, with a surprisingly constant number of DCI cases over the years. There is still need for improvement in divers' education in use of FAO2 for DCI symptoms. Fortunately, the outcome after recompression therapy is generally successful. Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.
Entities:
Keywords:
Arctic diving; Decompression sickness; Diving; Epidemiology; First aid oxygen; Hyperbaric oxygen treatment
Authors: Jean-Eric Blatteau; E Gempp; O Simon; M Coulange; B Delafosse; V Souday; G Cochard; J Arvieux; A Henckes; P Lafere; P Germonpre; J-M Lapoussiere; M Hugon; P Constantin; A Barthelemy Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: David R Pendergast; Curtis J Senf; Michael C Fletcher; Claes E G Lundgren Journal: Undersea Hyperb Med Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 0.698
Authors: Laura J Tuominen; Sofia Sokolowski; Richard V Lundell; Anne K Räisänen-Sokolowski Journal: Diving Hyperb Med Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 1.228
Authors: Richard V Lundell; Laura Tuominen; Tommi Ojanen; Kai Parkkola; Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 4.566