Literature DB >> 31828335

Health system productivity in China: a comparison of pre- and post-2009 healthcare reform.

Peipei Chai1,2, Yuhui Zhang2, Maigeng Zhou3, Shiwei Liu3, Yohannes Kinfu1.   

Abstract

In 2009, China launched an ambitious health system reform that combined extending social health insurance scheme with improving efficiency, access and quality of care in the country. To assess the impact of the policy on efficiency and productivity change, we investigated the country's health system performance at provincial levels during pre- and post-reform period. Outputs were measured using multiple health outcomes (namely, non-communicable diseases free healthy life years and infant and maternal survival rates), while health expenditure, number of medical personnel and hospital beds per 1000 residents were used as proxy measures for health inputs. Changes in productivity were quantified using a bootstrap Malmquist productivity index (MPI). The analysis focused on the period between 2004 and 2015. This was to capture pre- and post-policy implementation experience and to ensure that enough time was allowed for the policy to work through. Finally, a bootstrap Tobit regression model for panel data was applied to examine the potential effects of contextual factors on productivity change. The result showed that the reform has had negative effects on productivity. Only scale efficiency had improved steadily, but the decline in the scale of technological change observed during the same period meant that the progress in scale efficiency had been masked. Better economic performance (as measured by per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP)) and higher human resource to capital investment ratio (as measured by density of medical staff per hospital beds) tended to boost productivity growth, while population aging, low educational attainment and higher percentage of out-of-pocket (OOP) payments had adverse effects. Improving health system productivity in China requires improving financial risk protection and maintaining proper balance between human and capital investment in the country.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Health system; Malmquist productivity index; health reform; productivity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31828335     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  4 in total

1.  Preliminary evaluation of a new initiative to centralize colorectal cancer care during the COVID-19 epidemic in Shanghai, China: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Xuejing Yu; Xueyun Zeng; Zheng Wang; Danqing Zhou; Zhongchen Liu; Feng Liu; Chengle Zhuang; Ying Zhuang; Ji Zhang; Peiqin Niu; Ben Yan; Rui Zhi; Jiyu Li; Jiaoling Huang; Huanlong Qin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-01

2.  The impact of healthcare reform on the dynamic changes in health service utilization and equity: a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Wenqin Guo; Gangjun Liu; Li Ma; Baokai Gao; Wenlong Wang; Zhaoyan Hu; Yanmei Tian; Wenwen Xiao; Hui Qiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Working intentions of medical students in response to healthcare workplace violence and descending resources reform in China.

Authors:  Shuhong Wang; Hongjun Zhao; Zesheng Sun
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.263

4.  Levels, trends, and determinants of effectiveness on the hierarchical medical system in China: Data envelopment analysis and bootstrapping truncated regression analysis.

Authors:  Yuanxin Hou; Wenjuan Tao; Shufen Hou; Weimin Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.