BACKGROUND: Enhanced influenza vaccines may improve protection for older adults, but comparative immunogenicity data are limited. Our objective was to examine immune responses to enhanced influenza vaccines, compared to standard-dose vaccines, in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS:Community-dwelling older adults aged 65-82 years in Hong Kong were randomly allocated (October 2017-January 2018) to receive 2017-2018 Northern hemisphere formulations of a standard-dose quadrivalent vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted trivalent vaccine, high-dose trivalent vaccine, or recombinant-hemagglutinin (rHA) quadrivalent vaccine. Sera collected from 200 recipients of each vaccine before and at 30-days postvaccination were assessed for antibodies to egg-propagated vaccine strains by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and to cell-propagated A/Hong Kong/4801/2014(H3N2) virus by microneutralization (MN). Influenza-specific CD4+ andCD8+ T cell responses were assessed in 20 participants per group. RESULTS:Mean fold rises (MFR) in HAI titers to egg-propagated A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) and the MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) were statistically significantly higher in the enhanced vaccine groups, compared to the standard-dose vaccine. The MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) was highest among rHA recipients (4.7), followed by high-dose (3.4) and MF59-adjuvanted (2.9) recipients, compared to standard-dose recipients (2.3). Similarly, the ratio of postvaccination MN titers among rHA recipients to cell-propagated A(H3N2) recipients was 2.57-fold higher than the standard-dose vaccine, which was statistically higher than the high-dose (1.33-fold) and MF59-adjuvanted (1.43-fold) recipient ratios. Enhanced vaccines also resulted in the boosting of T-cell responses. CONCLUSIONS: In this head-to-head comparison, older adults receiving enhanced vaccines showed improved humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, compared to standard-dose vaccine recipients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03330132. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2019.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Enhanced influenza vaccines may improve protection for older adults, but comparative immunogenicity data are limited. Our objective was to examine immune responses to enhanced influenza vaccines, compared to standard-dose vaccines, in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: Community-dwelling older adults aged 65-82 years in Hong Kong were randomly allocated (October 2017-January 2018) to receive 2017-2018 Northern hemisphere formulations of a standard-dose quadrivalent vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted trivalent vaccine, high-dose trivalent vaccine, or recombinant-hemagglutinin (rHA) quadrivalent vaccine. Sera collected from 200 recipients of each vaccine before and at 30-days postvaccination were assessed for antibodies to egg-propagated vaccine strains by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and to cell-propagated A/Hong Kong/4801/2014(H3N2) virus by microneutralization (MN). Influenza-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were assessed in 20 participants per group. RESULTS: Mean fold rises (MFR) in HAI titers to egg-propagated A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) and the MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) were statistically significantly higher in the enhanced vaccine groups, compared to the standard-dose vaccine. The MFR in MN to cell-propagated A(H3N2) was highest among rHA recipients (4.7), followed by high-dose (3.4) and MF59-adjuvanted (2.9) recipients, compared to standard-dose recipients (2.3). Similarly, the ratio of postvaccination MN titers among rHA recipients to cell-propagated A(H3N2) recipients was 2.57-fold higher than the standard-dose vaccine, which was statistically higher than the high-dose (1.33-fold) and MF59-adjuvanted (1.43-fold) recipient ratios. Enhanced vaccines also resulted in the boosting of T-cell responses. CONCLUSIONS: In this head-to-head comparison, older adults receiving enhanced vaccines showed improved humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, compared to standard-dose vaccine recipients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03330132. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2019.
Authors: Lisa M Dunkle; Ruvim Izikson; Peter Patriarca; Karen L Goldenthal; Derek Muse; Janice Callahan; Manon M J Cox Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edward A Belongia; Melissa D Simpson; Jennifer P King; Maria E Sundaram; Nicholas S Kelley; Michael T Osterholm; Huong Q McLean Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Carlos A DiazGranados; Andrew J Dunning; Murray Kimmel; Daniel Kirby; John Treanor; Avi Collins; Richard Pollak; Janet Christoff; John Earl; Victoria Landolfi; Earl Martin; Sanjay Gurunathan; Richard Nathan; David P Greenberg; Nadia G Tornieporth; Michael D Decker; H Keipp Talbot Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marc Rondy; Nathalie El Omeiri; Mark G Thompson; Alain Levêque; Alain Moren; Sheena G Sullivan Journal: J Infect Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: John J Treanor; Gilbert M Schiff; Robert B Couch; Thomas R Cate; Rebecca C Brady; C Mhorag Hay; Mark Wolff; Dewei She; Manon M J Cox Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2006-03-28 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Seth J Zost; Kaela Parkhouse; Megan E Gumina; Kangchon Kim; Sebastian Diaz Perez; Patrick C Wilson; John J Treanor; Andrea J Sant; Sarah Cobey; Scott E Hensley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Miguel Ángel Palacios-Pedrero; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Tanja Becker; Husni Elbahesh; Guus F Rimmelzwaan; Giulietta Saletti Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Nathalie Loeb; Melissa K Andrew; Mark Loeb; George A Kuchel; Laura Haynes; Janet E McElhaney; Chris P Verschoor Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Jeremy Reich; Mark G Thompson; Benjamin J Cowling; A Danielle Iuliano; Carolyn Greene; Yuyun Chen; Rachael Phadnis; Nancy H L Leung; Ying Song; Vicky J Fang; Cuiling Xu; Qigang Dai; Jun Zhang; Hongjun Zhang; Fiona Havers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Janet E McElhaney; Chris P Verschoor; Melissa K Andrew; Laura Haynes; George A Kuchel; Graham Pawelec Journal: Immun Ageing Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 6.400