| Literature DB >> 31827790 |
Geoffroy Berthelot1,2,3, Stacey Johnson4, Philippe Noirez1,2, Juliana Antero1,2, Adrien Marck1,2,3, François-Denis Desgorces1,2, Fabien Pifferi5, Patrick A Carter6, Michael Spedding7, Archana Singh Manoux8,9, Jean-François Toussaint1,2,10.
Abstract
The age-performance relationship describes changes in the organism's structural and functional capabilities over the course of the lifespan. The typical, empirical pattern is an asymmetrical inverted-U shape association with peak capacity occurring early in life. This process is well described in the literature, with an increasing interest in features that characterize this pattern, such as the rate of growth, age of peak performance, and rate of decline with aging. This is usually examined in cohorts of individuals followed over time with repeat assessments of physical or cognitive abilities. This framework ought to be integrated into public health programs, embedding the beneficial (such as physical or cognitive training) or adverse effects (such as chronic diseases or injuries) that respectively sustain or limit capabilities. The maintenance of physical or cognitive performances at older ages would result in both optimal health and promote resistance to disabling conditions and chronic diseases, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. The causes of accelerated degeneration of health optima are mainly: sedentary and unhealthy lifestyles -including poor nutrition-, exposure to environmental pollutants, and heterogeneity in aging. Better knowledge of optima, compatible with or required for good health, should also allow for establishing ideal conditions for longevity.Entities:
Keywords: Age-performance; Aging; Performance; Public health
Year: 2019 PMID: 31827790 PMCID: PMC6900856 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-019-0375-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Fig. 1Heterogeneity in individual trajectories in two contests. Performance is gathered in (A, C) the 100m. straight (physical contest) and (B, D) competitions of chess Grandmasters (cognitive contest). Each dot corresponds to a performance and each color corresponds to an individual. The black line is the average performance at each age. A total of 935 unique trajectories of elite athletes are plotted in (C), totaling 57,079 performances. Sources for performance data are detailed in [18]. A total of 1477 unique trajectories of Grandmasters are described in (D), totaling 138,015 performances. Grandmasters’ ratings are gathered from Jeff Sonas’ Chessmetrics website (http://www.chessmetrics.com). A random selection of 10 individual trajectories are presented in A and B
Fig. 2History of individual trajectories and strategies to expand the ; Performance against age in arbitrary units for (A) an individual that alters his in a self autonomous manner and (B) effect of a beneficial strategy on another individual . The described in (A) is the result of perturbations associated with (i) detrimental lifestyle (such as sedentary behavior) in early childhood, (ii) an injury or disease affecting the performance and (iii) a major change in lifestyle that results in an artificial, delayed age of peak performance occurring much later in life. In (B) we show how a beneficial strategy is expected to expand the , providing room for an increase in performance