| Literature DB >> 31827384 |
Enrique Becerril-Villanueva1, Gilberto Pérez-Sánchez1, Samantha Alvarez-Herrera1, Manuel Iván Girón-Pérez2,3, Rodrigo Arreola4, Carlos Cruz-Fuentes4, Lino Palacios5, Francisco R de la Peña5, Lenin Pavón1.
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) has a prevalence of 5% in adolescents. Several studies have described the association between the inflammatory response and MDD, but little is known about the relationship between MDD and growth factors, such as IL-7, IL-9, IL-17A, VEGF, basic FGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF. It must be appointed that there are scarce reports on growth factors in adolescents with MDD and even fewer with a clinical follow-up. In this work, we evaluated the levels of growth factors (IL-7, IL-9, IL-17A, VEGF, basic FGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF) in MDD adolescents and the clinical follow-up during eight weeks of treatment with fluoxetine. Methods. All patients were diagnosed according to the DSM-IV-TR, and the severity of the symptoms was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Growth factors IL-7, IL-9, IL-17A, VEGF, basic FGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF were quantified by cytometric bead array using serum samples from 22 adolescents with MDD and 18 healthy volunteers. Results. All patients showed clinical improvement since the fourth week of pharmacological treatment according to the HDRS. Considerably higher levels of IL-7, IL-9, IL-17A, VEGF, basic FGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF were detected in MDD adolescents as compared to healthy volunteers. A significant but temporal decrease was detected in basic FGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF at week four of fluoxetine administration. Conclusions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to show alterations in the levels of growth factors, such as IL-7, IL-9, IL-17A, VEGF, basic FGF, G-CSF, and GM-CSF in MDD adolescents during eight weeks of clinical follow-up. These disturbances might be involved in the physiopathology of MDD since such growth factors have been proven to participate in the neural development and correct functioning of the CNS; therefore, subtle alterations in it may contribute to MDD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31827384 PMCID: PMC6885844 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9130868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Figure 1Flow diagram of eight-week fluoxetine treatment in adolescents with major depressive disorder.
(a) Demographic data
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | 18.9 ± 1.2 | 17.1 ± 2.3 |
| Gender (male/female) | 4/14 | 4/18 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.2 ± 2.1 | 23.1 ± 2.1 |
| Education (years) | 12.9 ± 1.2 | 11.5 ± 2.6 |
| Family history (yes/no) | 3/15 | 8/14 |
| First episode | NA | 8 |
| Recurrent episode | NA | 14 |
(b) Molecular and clinimetric data
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||
| IL-7 | 10.7 ± 1.8 | 23.7 ± 6.4 | 21.0 ± 5.5 | 24.3 ± 6.7 | ∗∗∗∗ | ns | ns |
| IL-9 | 20.7 ± 3.9 | 30.3 ± 7.8 | 28.3 ± 9.8 | 32.7 ± 7.8 | ∗∗ | ns | ns |
| IL-17A | 348.4 ± 16.8 | 424.8 ± 48.5 | 391.1 ± 55.7 | 420.4 ± 36.0 | ∗∗∗∗ | ns | ns |
| FGF basic | 84.8 ± 6.5 | 116.7 ± 18.0 | 98.7 ± 21.2 | 115.8 ± 14.2 | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ns |
| VEGF | 95.7 ± 15.2 | 150.7 ± 33.3 | 146.0 ± 24.5 | 145.1 ± 17.5 | ∗∗∗∗ | ns | ns |
| G-CSF | 232.9 ± 21.1 | 333.0 ± 54.5 | 285.3 ± 49.2 | 326.4 ± 45.1 | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ns |
| GM-CSF | 28.3 ± 6.2 | 74.0 ± 17.5 | 57.0 ± 21.2 | 64.1 ± 14.2 | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ns |
|
| |||||||
| HDRS | NA | 19.41 ± 4.72 | 9.13 ± 3.5 | 6.09 ± 2.4 | NA | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc. Statistical significance was attributed when ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. HV = healthy volunteers; NA = not applicable; ns = not significant P > 0.05; vs. = versus; HDRS = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; W = weeks of clinical follow-up.