Literature DB >> 31827355

Polarized and Pyramidal Training Intensity Distribution: Relationship with a Half-Ironman Distance Triathlon Competition.

Sergio Selles-Perez1, José Fernández-Sáez2,3, Roberto Cejuela1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to relate the training intensity distribution with performance in a Half-Ironman distance triathlon competition. A total of 18 recreational-level triathletes were divided into two training groups according to their training intensity distribution: Polarized (POL) and Pyramidal (PYR). Prior to the specific training period of the study, subjects performed a ramp-protocol test, running and cycling to determine ventilatory thresholds (VT) through gas-exchange analysis. For swimming, subjects performed an 800-metre test to establish their training zones. Training was quantified based on the cumulative time spent in 3 intensity zones: zone 1 (low intensity, <VT1), zone 2 (moderate intensity, VT1-VT2) and zone 3 (high intensity >VT2). POL competed 84.5%/4.2%/11.3% and PYR 77.9%/18.8%/3.3% of total training time for zones 1,2 and 3 respectively. The goal of the training period was a half Ironman distance triathlon. Training time in zone 2 inversely correlated with swimming and cycling race time in POL and with running and total race time in PYR. Power at VT2 on bike and speed at VT2 as well as maximum aerobic power and speed in the physiological post test inversely correlated with bike and run segment respectively and with total race time. These results suggest that training time in zone 2 was related with better performance on a Half-Ironman race in amateur triathletes. Future experimental research is needed to clarify the importance of training intensity distribution regarding performance. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Keywords:  Endurance training; endurance performance; training zones; triathlon

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31827355      PMCID: PMC6873141     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  32 in total

1.  Heart rate and performance parameters in elite cyclists: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  A Lucía; J Hoyos; M Pérez; J L Chicharro
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  The 4000-m team pursuit cycling world record: theoretical and practical aspects.

Authors:  Yorck Olaf Schumacher; Peter Mueller
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Methodological aspects of maximal lactate steady state-implications for performance testing.

Authors:  Ralph Beneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  A 6-month analysis of training-intensity distribution and physiological adaptation in Ironman triathletes.

Authors:  Craig M Neal; Angus M Hunter; Stuart D R Galloway
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Physiological and performance effects of low- versus mixed-intensity rowing training.

Authors:  Stephen A Ingham; Helen Carter; Gregory P Whyte; Jonathan H Doust
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Six weeks of a polarized training-intensity distribution leads to greater physiological and performance adaptations than a threshold model in trained cyclists.

Authors:  Craig M Neal; Angus M Hunter; Lorraine Brennan; Aifric O'Sullivan; D Lee Hamilton; Giuseppe De Vito; Stuart D R Galloway
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-12-20

7.  Blood markers of recovery from Ironman distance races in an elite triathlete.

Authors:  Iñigo Mujika; Felipe Pereira da Silveira; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Relationship of anthropometric and training characteristics with race performance in endurance and ultra-endurance athletes.

Authors:  Beat Knechtle
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2014-06

9.  Is Marathon Training Harder than the Ironman Training? An ECO-method Comparison.

Authors:  Jonathan Esteve-Lanao; Diego Moreno-Pérez; Claudia A Cardona; Eneko Larumbe-Zabala; Iker Muñoz; Sergio Sellés; Roberto Cejuela
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Changes in Triathletes' Performance and Body Composition During a Specific Training Period for a Half-Ironman Race.

Authors:  Sergio Sellés-Pérez; José Fernández-Sáez; Alberto Férriz-Valero; Jonathan Esteve-Lanao; Roberto Cejuela
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.193

View more
  5 in total

1.  Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study.

Authors:  Golo Röhrken; Steffen Held; Lars Donath
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Effect of Two Different Training Interventions on Cycling Performance in Mountain Bike Cross-Country Olympic Athletes.

Authors:  Patrick Schneeweiss; Philipp Schellhorn; Daniel Haigis; Andreas Michael Niess; Peter Martus; Inga Krauss
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Road to Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games: Training Characteristics of a World Class Male Triathlete.

Authors:  Roberto Cejuela; Sergio Sellés-Pérez
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Absolute Accelerometer-Based Intensity Prescription Compared to Physiological Variables in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women.

Authors:  Philipp Birnbaumer; Pavel Dietz; Estelle Dorothy Watson; Gudani Mukoma; Alexander Müller; Matteo Christian Sattler; Johannes Jaunig; Mireille Nicoline Maria van Poppel; Peter Hofmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Effects of Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Triathletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alicia Borrego-Sánchez; Maria Jesus Vinolo-Gil; Maria de-la-Casa-Almeida; Manuel Rodríguez-Huguet; María Jesús Casuso-Holgado; Rocío Martín-Valero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.