Literature DB >> 31827262

Sexual functions and quality of life of women over 50 years with urinary incontinence, lower urinary tract symptoms and/or pelvic organ prolapse.

Funda Gungor Ugurlucan1, Ipek Evruke2, Cenk Yasa2, Ozlem Dural2, Onay Yalcin2.   

Abstract

Sexual function is important for health and quality of life. We evaluated effects of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary incontinence (UI) and coital incontinence, and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on sexual functions and quality of life of women over 50 years of age. Secondary objectives were to compare rate of sexual activity, effects of type of UI and coital incontinence on sexual functions and quality of life among age groups. Female-Sexual-Function-Index (FSFI), Pelvic-Organ-Prolapse/Urinary-Incontinence Sexual-Function-Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12), and King's-Health-Questionnaire (KHQ) were used for evaluation. Between 2013 and 2018, 1256 women were included. 565 women were 50-59 years (Group 1), 440 were 60-69 (Group 2), 251 were over 70 (Group-3). 763 women (60.7%) suffered from LUTS, 141 women (11.2%) suffered from POP only, and 352 women (28%) suffered from POP + LUTS. Younger women were more sexually active (p = 0.001). FSFI and PISQ-12 scores of women suffering from LUTS, POP + LUTS, and POP only were similar. Lubrication and orgasm scores were worse in Group 3 (p = 0.006 and 0.037). Type of UI did not affect FSFI and PISQ-12 scores. Coital incontinence was correlated with mixed UI in Groups 1 (p = 0.01) and 2 (p = 0.03). There was no association with coital incontinence and type of UI in Group 3. Coital incontinence had adverse effect in FSFI, PISQ-12 scores. In younger women, coital incontinence had an adverse effect on desire and arousal domains. KHQ scores were worse in women having LUTS in comparison to women suffering from POP only (p = 0.00) and were worse in Groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.002 and 0.013). KHQ scores were worse in women suffering from urge or mixed UI (p = 0.00). Coital incontinence had adverse effect in KHQ scores. In conclusion, aging, LUTS, UI, and coital incontinence have detrimental effects on sexual functions and quality of life. Urge or mixed UI have more adverse effects on quality of life. Quality of life is worse in younger women suffering from UI and coital incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31827262     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-019-0219-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  39 in total

Review 1.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Changes in sexual function among midlife women: "I'm older… and I'm wiser".

Authors:  Holly N Thomas; Megan Hamm; Rachel Hess; Rebecca C Thurston
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Sleep Quality and Daytime Sleepiness Among Women With Urgency Predominant Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  William D Winkelman; Ann Warsi; Alison J Huang; Michael Schembri; Rebecca G Rogers; Holly E Richter; Deborah L Myers; Stephen R Kraus; Karen C Johnson; Rachel Hess; Thomas Gregory; Catherine S Bradley; Lily A Arya; Jeanette S Brown; Katie L Stone; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  General health and quality of life in patients with sexual dysfunctions.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Naeinian; Mohammad Reza Shaeiri; Fahimeh Sadat Hosseini
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.510

5.  Can the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Be Reduced by a Structured Training Program?

Authors:  Alex Mowat; Christopher Maher; Anita Pelecanos
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Andrea Salonia; Giuseppe Zanni; Rossella E Nappi; Alberto Briganti; Federico Dehò; Fabio Fabbri; Renzo Colombo; Giorgio Guazzoni; Valerio Di Girolamo; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Pelvic floor dysfunction: women's sexual concerns unraveled.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Roos; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan; Curt W Burger; Aggie T G Paulus
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Female sexual function and pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Victoria L Handa; Geoffrey Cundiff; Howard H Chang; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; P A Norton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Urinary incontinence and sexual health in a population sample of older people.

Authors:  David M Lee; Josie Tetley; Neil Pendleton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  2 in total

1.  Extensive impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pelvic floor dysfunctions care: A nationwide interdisciplinary survey.

Authors:  Emilio Sacco; Carlo Gandi; Vincenzo Li Marzi; Gianfranco Lamberti; Maurizio Serati; Enrico Finazzi Agro'; Marco Soligo
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Effects of mesh surgery on sexual function in pelvic prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Gökmen Sukgen; Adem Altunkol; Ayşe Yiğit
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.