Literature DB >> 31827256

A comparative examination of models of service delivery intended to support community integration in the immediate period following inpatient rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.

Linda Barclay1, Aislinn Lalor2,3, Christine Migliorini2,4, Lauren Robins2,5.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare models of service delivery intended to support community integration in the immediate period following inpatient rehabilitation for SCI, and describe the characteristics of these models or approaches.
SETTING: Spinal services from multiple international countries
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were completed with 12 participants from a convenience sample of ten spinal services from developed economies. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.
RESULTS: Three themes were identified, and are described with supporting quotations. These are: Theme One-Models of service delivery (sub-themes: staffing, peer mentors, facilitating community integration during inpatient rehabilitation; Theme Two-Services provided (sub-themes: telehealth, vocational services, groups); Theme Three-Facilitating self-efficacy and self-management.
CONCLUSIONS: A variety of models aimed at supporting community integration in the immediate period following inpatient rehabilitation for SCI were found. Multi-disciplinary staffing and involvement of peer mentors was common to all services. The importance of vocational rehabilitation was acknowledged by all participants, although the approaches taken to this varied. Telehealth has the potential to assist in self-management, particularly for patients who live a long distance from the spinal unit or are confined to the home for health reasons, and could be further developed. Although service models are greatly influenced by the funding context, the findings from this study can be used to inform service planning in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31827256     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0394-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  3 in total

Review 1.  Current Approaches in Telehealth and Telerehabilitation for Spinal Cord Injury (TeleSCI).

Authors:  Hilary Touchett; Calvin Apodaca; Sameer Siddiqui; Donna Huang; Drew A Helmer; Jan A Lindsay; Padmavathy Ramaswamy; Kathy Marchant-Miros; Felicia Skelton
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 2.  Influences on Participation in Life After Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Inquiry Reveals Interaction of Context and Moderators.

Authors:  Delena Amsters; Melissa Kendall; Sarita Schuurs; Pim Kuipers
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Understanding how a community-based intervention for people with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh was delivered as part of a randomised controlled trial: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Hueiming Liu; Mohammad Sohrab Hossain; Md Shofiqul Islam; Md Akhlasur Rahman; Punam D Costa; Robert D Herbert; Stephen Jan; Ian D Cameron; Stephen Muldoon; Harvinder S Chhabra; Richard I Lindley; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Stanley Ducharme; Valerie Taylor; Lisa A Harvey
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.