| Literature DB >> 31827229 |
Valentina Pintus1, Anthony J Baragona2, Karin Wieland3, Michael Schilling4, Silvia Miklin-Kniefacz5, Christoph Haisch3, Manfred Schreiner6.
Abstract
This work presents a comprehensive, multi-analytical scientific approach for determining the type of lacquer and artistic materials used by Jean Dunand on his work "The Return of the Hunters" (1935). For this purpose, thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation - gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (THM-GC/MS), optical microscopy (OM) in visible (Vis) and ultraviolet light (UV), and scanning electron microscopy - energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) were selected. Furthermore, a novel application of micro attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (µATR-FTIR) spectroscopic mapping by univariate and multivariate analysis was applied for studying the complex lacquer paint stratigraphy. The results show that Vietnamese lacquer was used as a binder, mixed together with linseed oil and pine resins as additives in combination with inorganic pigments, and that shellac was included on the top of the paint; they document an important step in the story of the transfer of Vietnamese lacquer painting techniques to Europe.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31827229 PMCID: PMC6906402 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55471-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) “The Return of the Hunters” (1935) by Jean Dunand based on eight panels and (b) the third panel at the top from the left side subject of the investigations, showing the sampling area as a circled area on the lower right side. Photos by Renate Neder.
Figure 2(a) Optical microscopy image of the cross-sectioned sample observed by reflected visible light showing the main layers as well as the µATR-FTIR mapped area (red box - Section 2.3) and (b) by ultraviolet light. (c) SEM micrograph of the whole cross-sectioned sample and (d) detail of the area investigated by point and bulk EDX analysis showing the main lacquer paint layers.
Elements detected by bulk EDX analysis per layer on the cross-sectioned sample.
| Layer | Elements |
|---|---|
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 0 |
Main elements are bold written. (+++ high, ++ moderate, + low concentration). *left side and **right side of the main crack in Fig. 2.
Figure 3Gestalt graph of Anacard markers detected in the investigated paint sample.
List of the target compounds for specific groups detected by THM-GC/MS, with their corresponding compound name, Retention Index (RI), and mass to charge ratio (m/z).
| Group type | Target compound name | RI | m/z |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrate - Anacards | Laccol carbohydrate - unverified 3 | 1501 | 75, 101, |
| Laccol carbohydrate - unverified 4 | 1526 | 75, 101, | |
| Laccol carbohydrate - unverified 6 | 1554 | 75, 101, | |
| Laccol carbohydrate - unverified 10 | 2467 | 75, 88, 101, | |
| Resin - | 6-dehydroabietic acid, methyl ester | 2377 | 141, 165, 197, |
| Dehydroabietic acid, methyl ester | 2383 | 173, 197, 239, 299, | |
| Mercusic acid, dimethyl ester | 2456 | ||
| 7-methoxy-tetra-dehydroabietic acid, methyl ester | 2481 | 227, 267, 282, 327, | |
| 7,15-dimethoxy-tetra-dehydroabietic acid, methyl ester | 2611 | 297, 313, 340, 357, | |
| 7-oxo-dehydroabietic acid, methyl ester | 2624 | 187, | |
| Resin - Shellac | Laccishelloic acid: dimethyl ester, methyl ether | 2119 | 167, |
| Jalaric acid, tetramethyl (Ken) | 2166 | 45, | |
| Jalaric acid, tetramethyl (Henk) | 2206 | 45, | |
| Shelloic acid: dimethyl ester, dimethyl ether | 2246 | 201, 228, 261, 289, | |
| Aleuritic acid methyl ester, trimethyl ether | 2375 | 71, | |
| Protein - Animal glue | 1H-Pyrrole, 1-methyl | 736 | 39, 43, 53, 80, |
| Pyrrole | 754 | 39, 41, | |
| 2-aminopyridine | 1017 | 39, 42, 51, 67, | |
| Protein 3 - blood & glue | 1702 | 42, 70, | |
| Glue marker - Mazzeo | 1740 | 65, 93, 130, | |
| Pigment - Arsenic based | Dimethyl-methylthio-arsine | 842 | 89, 109, 121, |
| Arsenic -As4 | 1379 | 75, 150, 225, | |
| Various | Dimethyl disulfide | 749 | 45, 46, 61, 79, |
| Dimethyl sulfate | 868 | 45, 66, | |
| Trimethyl phosphate | 944 | 79, 95, 109, |
Figure 4Fatty acid bar graph for the investigated paint sample.
Figure 5Averaged µATR-FTIR spectral profile extracted from the ground layer (0) as well as from the three painted layers of the cross-sectioned sample.
Figure 6Univariate µATR-FTIR chemical maps of the main detected compounds in the cross-sectioned sample by using the component regression function.
Figure 7(a) PC1-PC2 Score plot depicting eight different groups of clusters: pale green and red at the right bottom as inorganic components, orange, light and dark blue, and the darkest green at the left side as organic components, while light and medium-dark green at the top mainly as embedding media. The localization of each cluster along the cross-section is shown in Fig. 8. (b) PC1-PC2 score plot superimposed with loadings plot. Loadings are marked in light green, light blue and light orange. The wavenumbers corresponding to the marked spectral descriptors in the loadings plot are listed up with the according assignment to a component in the cross-section.
Figure 8PC score maps with the respective average spectral profiles (positions marked with black squares) extracted from each paint layer with the bands of the main components marked in the spectra.