| Literature DB >> 31826086 |
Otávio Augusto Vendas Tanus1, Carlos Henrique Marques Dos Santos1,2, Doroty Mesquita Dourado2, Andrea Lima Conde1, Fernanda Giuncanse2, Isadora Ferreira de Souza2, Izabela Oliveira Costa2, Rochelle Leite Costa2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anal fistula is by definition the communication between the rectum or anal canal with the perineal region, which may be epithelialized and has cryptoglandular origin in 90% of cases. There are a large number of techniques for successfully treating trans-sphincteric fistulas of 20-50%, including primary sphincteroplasty, but it is not clear whether the material used would influence the outcome. AIM: To analyze the efficacy of polydioxanone and polypropylene wire in primary post-fistulotomy sphincteroplasty in the treatment of trans-sphincteric fistulas in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31826086 PMCID: PMC6902890 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arq Bras Cir Dig ISSN: 0102-6720
FIGURE 1A) Steel wire traversing anal sphincter in the pectine line; B) twisted steel wire after placement through the anal sphincter; C) fistulotomy; D) sectioned sphincter after fistulotomy; E) primary sphincteroplasty after fistulotomy
FIGURE 2A) Photomicrography illustrating the accomplishment of the measurement of the distance of the muscular cables; B-E) photomicrographies demonstrating the degree of fibrosis: B) control group; C) fistulotomy group; D) polypropylene group; E) polydioxanone group. (Black arrows show collagen fibers and red arrows neoformation of blood vessels, GT, 20x).
Persistence of anal fistula in the animals studied
| Animal | Experimental Group | |||
| Control | Fistulotomy | Polydioxanone | Polypropylene | |
| 1 | Yes | No | No | No |
| 2 | Yes | No | No | No |
| 3 | Yes | No | No | No |
| 4 | Yes | No | No | No |
| 5 | Yes | No | No | No |
| 6 | - | - | No | No |
| 7 | - | - | No | No |
| 8 | - | - | No | No |
| 9 | - | - | No | No |
| 10 | - | - | No | No |
| % | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Number | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The results are presented in their individual values or relative frequency (%) and absolute frequency (number).
Results regarding the area, perimeter and degree of fibrosis caused by anal fistula in the animals of the control group.
| Animal | Control group | ||
| Area of anal fistula* | Perimeter of anal fistula * | Grade of fibrosis** | |
| 1 | 8836 | 567 | 1 |
| 2 | 11405 | 595 | 2 |
| 3 | 37730 | 1111 | 2 |
| 4 | 16931 | 1195 | 2 |
| 5 | 29067 | 1407 | 1 |
| Mean | 20793.80 | 975.00 | 1.60 |
| SEM | 5483.34 | 167.99 | 0.24 |
The results are presented in their individual values or in mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); * =in micrometers; ** =fibrosis score
Results related to the area of distance of the muscle cables in animals from each of the experimental groups.
| Animal | Experimental group | p | ||
| Fistulotomy | Polydioxanone | Polypropylene | ||
| 1 | 966 | 7308 | 7638 | |
| 2 | 1007 | 5663 | 2259 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 2959 | 1136 | |
| 4 | 2134 | 6177 | 794 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 2035 | 385 | |
| 6 | - | 1780 | 2388 | |
| 7 | - | 5954 | 8269 | |
| 8 | - | 5402 | 8501 | |
| 9 | - | 7657 | 6783 | |
| 10 | - | 3913 | 8502 | |
| Mean | 1620.00a | 4884.80a | 4665.50a | 0.078 |
| SEM | 260.03 | 663.81 | 1117.94 | |
The results are presented in their individual values or in mean±standard error of the mean (SEM); value of p in the one-way ANOVA test; similar letters in the row indicate that there is no significant difference between the experimental groups (Tukey post-test p>0.05); values presented in micrometers.
Results regarding the degree of fibrosis caused by the different treatments in the animals of each of the experimental groups.
| Animal | Experimental group | p | ||
| Fistulotomy | Polydioxanone | Polypropylene | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| Mean | 2.30a | 3.10a | 2.80a | 0.113 |
| SEM | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.33 | |
The results are presented in their individual values or in mean±standard error of the mean (SEM); value of p in the one-way ANOVA test; similar letters in the row indicate that there is no significant difference between the experimental groups (Tukey post-test, p> 0.05)