| Literature DB >> 31825515 |
Chunxiu Hu1, Miriam Hoene2, Peter Plomgaard3,4,5, Jakob S Hansen3,4, Xinjie Zhao1, Jia Li2, Xiaolin Wang1, Jens O Clemmesen6, Niels H Secher7, Hans U Häring8,9, Rainer Lehmann2,8,9, Guowang Xu1, Cora Weigert2,8,9.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The liver is crucial to maintain energy homeostasis during exercise. Skeletal muscle-derived metabolites can contribute to the regulation of hepatic metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Capillary electrophoresis; cAMP; exercise; liver; metabolomics; succinate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31825515 PMCID: PMC7062410 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0021-972X Impact factor: 5.958
Figure 1.Blood gas fluxes in the hepato-splanchnic exercise study (1A, 1B) and one-legged knee extensor study (1C, 1D). 1A: Oxygen (O2) uptake and 1B: Carbon dioxide (CO2) release over the hepato-splanchnic bed. 1C: O2 uptake and 1D: CO2 release over the exercising (solid line) and resting leg (dashed line). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SEM). † significant effect of time, ‡ significant effect of leg*time.
Figure 2.Effects of exercise on systemic concentrations of metabolites detected in plasma using CE-TOF/MS and UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS in the hepato-splanchnic exercise study. 2A: Metabolites significantly affected by exercise on the arterial (systemic) level, clustered by Spearman rank-order correlation. Each column represents unit variance (UV)-scaled, mean-centered values from 1 individual. 2B: concentration (mean ± standard error [SEM]) and 2C: percentages of free fatty acids (FFA), summed up according to chain length and degree of saturation (Abbreviations: mu, mono-unsaturated; pu, poly-unsaturated; s, saturated FFA). Only FFA with a chain length of more than 10 carbon atoms, from the UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS analysis, were included.
Figure 3.Effects of exercise on the hepato-splanchnic flux of metabolites. 3A: Metabolites exhibiting significant changes in uptake (positive values, red) or release (negative values, blue) from the hepato-splanchnic bed. Each column represents unit variance (UV)-scaled values of the mean of all participants. Metabolites were ordered according to pathway and kinetics. 3B: Hepato-splanchnic flux of free fatty acids (FFA) quantified by UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS, summed up according to chain length and saturation (Abbreviations: mu, mono-unsaturated; pu, poly-unsaturated; s, saturated FFA) presented as mean ± standard error (SEM). #: significantly different from 0 minutes.
FFA > 10 carbon atoms exhibiting hepato-splanchnic uptake or release in the basal, fasting state
| Hepato-splanchnic flux [µmol/min] | t-test against 0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM |
| |
| FFA 17:0 | -0.19 | 0.08 | 0.0499 |
| FFA 18:0 | -15.15 | 4.71 | 0.0106 |
| FFA 20:0 | -0.23 | 0.09 | 0.0263 |
| FFA 24:0 | -0.06 | 0.02 | 0.0454 |
| FFA 24:1 | -0.03 | 0.01 | 0.0157 |
| FFA 12:0 | 0.73 | 0.17 | 0.0018 |
| FFA 14:0 | 2.53 | 0.52 | 0.0009 |
| FFA 14:1 | 0.51 | 0.09 | 0.0003 |
| FFA 16:1 | 4.41 | 0.99 | 0.0016 |
| FFA 16:2 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.0005 |
| FFA 17:1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.0046 |
| FFA 18:2 | 7.24 | 1.99 | 0.0055 |
| FFA 18:3 | 1.26 | 0.22 | 0.0003 |
| FFA 18:4 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.0049 |
| FFA 22:5 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.0004 |
| FFA 22:6 | 1.24 | 0.49 | 0.0315 |
Negative values indicate a hepato-splanchnic release, positive values an uptake. The flux was assessed by a t-test against 0 (no uptake/release), a P < 0.05 was considered significant
Metabolites analyzed by CE-TOF/MS exhibiting hepato-splanchnic uptake or release in the basal, fasting state
| Hepato-splanchnic flux [AU/min] | t-test against 0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM |
| |
| 2-(α)-Hydroxybutyrate | -4.06 | 1.64 | 0.0430 |
| 2-Oxobutyrate | -1.56 | 0.35 | 0.0029 |
| 3-(β)-Hydroxybutyrate | -20.40 | 7.17 | 0.0249 |
| 3-Phenylpropionic acid | -0.33 | 0.11 | 0.0174 |
| Citrulline | -16.41 | 5.08 | 0.0120 |
| Glutamate | -19.17 | 4.92 | 0.0045 |
| Hippurate | -2.23 | 0.55 | 0.0050 |
| Isobutyrate | -2.79 | 1.09 | 0.0373 |
| N2-Phenylacetylglutamine | -0.23 | 0.06 | 0.0082 |
| N-Acetylalanine | -0.31 | 0.12 | 0.0444 |
| Propionate | -1.34 | 0.41 | 0.0133 |
| trans-Cinnamate | -0.77 | 0.12 | 0.0004 |
| 1-Methyladenosine | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.0273 |
| 2-Hydroxy-4-methylvaleric acid | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.0116 |
| 5-Oxoproline | 1.83 | 0.40 | 0.0026 |
| Alanine | 22.65 | 6.70 | 0.0096 |
| Asparagine | 3.42 | 1.37 | 0.0367 |
| Benzoate | 0.48 | 0.15 | 0.0169 |
| Citrate | 9.91 | 2.68 | 0.0077 |
| FFA 8:0 | 2.10 | 0.43 | 0.0017 |
| FFA 10:0 | 1.24 | 0.32 | 0.0064 |
| Guanidoacetic acid | 1.35 | 0.35 | 0.0050 |
| Methionine | 2.62 | 1.11 | 0.0456 |
| N5-Ethylglutamine | 0.45 | 0.19 | 0.0459 |
| Succinate | 0.79 | 0.16 | 0.0017 |
Negative values indicate a hepato-splanchnic release, positive values an uptake. The flux was assessed by a t-test against 0 (no uptake/release), a P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 4.Metabolites exhibiting a significant increased uptake into or release from the hepato-splanchnic bed were further assessed for an opposing flux from the exercising leg. This was the case for A: lactate, B: malate, C: succinate, D: FFA 6:0, E: FFA 8:0 and F: 3-(β)-hydroxybutyrate. Shown are arterial (systemic) concentrations from the hepato-splanchnic exercise study (left panel), hepato-splanchnic fluxes (middle panel) and fluxes over the resting and exercising leg (right panel). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SEM). †: significant effect of time; ‡: significant effect of leg*time; #: significantly different from 0 min; *: significantly different between exercising and resting leg according to Bonferroni post-hoc test. Succinate showed a significant difference between exercising and resting leg after 60 minutes of exercise, but only a trend towards a time effect in the two-way ANOVA (P = 0.0945).
Canonical pathways with enriched exercise-regulated transcripts in the liver of mice after a 1h-treadmill run
| Canonical pathway |
|
|---|---|
| PPAR Signaling | 6.17E-04 |
| IL-6 Signaling | 1.55E-03 |
| PI3K Signaling in B Lymphocytes | 2.24E-03 |
| p53 Signaling | 3.89E-03 |
| Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling | 5.25E-03 |
| IGF-1 Signaling | 5.37E-03 |
| SPINK1 General Cancer Pathway | 6.92E-03 |
| PXR/RXR Activation | 7.24E-03 |
| GADD45 Signaling | 7.24E-03 |
| NRF2-mediated Oxidative Stress Response | 7.59E-03 |
| Thrombopoietin Signaling | 9.55E-03 |
Ingenuity canonical pathway analysis of transcripts that were significantly different (limma t-test P < 0.05 and median fold change > |1.5|) between exercised and sedentary mice immediately after a 1h treadmill run (GSE110747 (19), only canonical pathways with a P-value < 0.01 are shown).
Upstream regulators implicated in the activation of genes in the liver of mice after a 1h-treadmill run
| Transcriptional regulators | Endogenous substances | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Z-score |
| Name | Z-score |
|
|
| 4.14 | 1.27E-15 | hydrogen peroxide | 3.438 | 1.74E-09 |
| RELA | 3.40 | 6.55E-09 | Ca2+ | 3.098 | 6.10E-13 |
|
| 3.21 | 5.01E-10 | leukotriene D4 | 3.095 | 2.10E-12 |
|
| 2.95 | 1.63E-03 |
| 2.878 | 5.32E-08 |
|
| 2.94 | 6.85E-10 | prostaglandin E2 | 2.588 | 1.06E-12 |
| STAT3 | 2.85 | 7.35E-11 | norepinephrine | 2.53 | 4.55E-11 |
| TP63 | 2.75 | 1.79E-04 | corticosterone | 2.414 | 1.13E-05 |
| NFKBIA | 2.72 | 3.32E-08 | fatty acids | 2.387 | 5.18E-06 |
| NFKB1 | 2.60 | 6.96E-06 | histamine | 2.189 | 1.26E-04 |
| SMAD3 | 2.59 | 5.32E-08 | nitric oxide | 2.173 | 3.25E-10 |
|
| 2.50 | 3.83E-10 | |||
| TP53 | 2.49 | 1.33E-06 | |||
| FOXL2 | 2.44 | 2.94E-06 | |||
| CTNNB1 | 2.43 | 2.62E-03 | |||
| MYOD1 | 2.37 | 2.88E-04 | |||
| MEF2C | 2.37 | 2.87E-06 | |||
| NUPR1 | 2.33 | 6.17E-03 | |||
| CDKN2A | 2.32 | 1.38E-08 | |||
| MEF2D | 2.20 | 5.93E-05 | |||
| ELK1 | 2.19 | 1.70E-06 | |||
| EGR1 | 2.18 | 4.98E-06 | |||
| PDX1 | 2.17 | 3.94E-11 | |||
| NFYA | 2.16 | 2.29E-05 | |||
|
| 2.06 | 3.81E-06 | |||
| STAT6 | 2.00 | 4.19E-05 |
Ingenuity upstream regulator analysis of transcripts that were significantly different (limma t-test P < 0.05 and median fold change > |1.5|) between exercised and sedentary mice immediately after a 1h treadmill run (GSE110747; (19)). Regulators with z-score > 2.0 (ie, predicted to be activated) and with a p-value of overlap <0.05 are shown (other regulator groups are not included). *Transcription regulators discussed as succinate-regulated factors are formatted bold.