| Literature DB >> 31824434 |
Anil Kumar Singh1,2, Pooja Yadav1, Ram Naresh Bharagava3, Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale4, Abhay Raj1.
Abstract
Various chemical compounds emerged including kraft lignin (KL) during the processes of papermaking. These chemical compounds in effluent of the paper industry have hazardous environmental impacts. KL is liable for causing pollution of aquatic and water bodies; hence, it must be minimized in order to maintain a healthy and sustainable environment. In the present study, KL degradation was performed with ligninolytic bacterium Serratia liquefaciens and we confirmed biotransformation of KL to various less polluted or harmless compounds. KL being degraded as 1000 mg/L-1 concentration with incubating 30°C for 72, 168, and 240 h, shaking at 120 rpm under laboratory conditions. We found 65% maximum degradation of KL and 62% decolorization by the treatment with S. liquefaciens for 240 h (10 days). After being the treatment of KL, clear changes were observed in its morphology (using scanning electron microscopy and stereo microscopy), hydrodynamic size (using dynamic light scattering), and the functional groups [using Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)]. Biotransformation of KL monitored by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) revealed formation of various metabolites. In addition to degradation of KL, detoxification (involving biotransformation into various metabolites) was assessed using cytotoxicity assays 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide [MTT and calcein-acetoxymethyl (AM) assays] using a human kidney cell line (NRK-52E), which indicated improved cell survival rates (74% for the bacteria-treated KL solution treated for 240 h) compared to the control (27%). Thus, the present study suggests that bacteria S. liquefaciens might be useful in reducing the pollution of KL by transforming it into various metabolites along with cytotoxicity reduction for environmental protection.Entities:
Keywords: Serratia liquefaciens; biodegradation; biotransformation; cytotoxicity; kraft lignin
Year: 2019 PMID: 31824434 PMCID: PMC6881242 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) The SEM images of the kraft lignin particles, showing rounded spherical shapes with smooth surfaces. (B) EDX spectra of KL powder.
FIGURE 2(A) Bacterial growth and LiP activity and (B) KL degradation and decolorization induced by S. liquefaciens at different time points (72, 168, and 240 h, equivalent to 3, 7, and 10 days). The study was conducted at 30 ± 1°C with shaking at 120 rpm. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).
FIGURE 3SEM images of (A) untreated KL and bacterial-treated KL solution after (B) 72, (C) 168, and (D) 240 h of incubation.
FIGURE 4Stereoscope microscopy images of (A) untreated KL and bacterial-treated KL solution after (B) 72, (C) 168, and (D) 240 h of incubation.
Mean particles size (hydrodynamic diameter, DH) of control and bacterial-treated KL samples estimated by dynamic light scattering (DLS).
| UT | 334.8 |
| BT (72 h) | 300.4 |
| BT (168 h) | 292.8 |
| BT (240 h) | 275.1 |
FIGURE 5ATR–FTIR spectra of (A) untreated KL and bacterial-treated KL solution after (B) 72, (C) 168, and (D) 240 h of incubation.
FIGURE 6Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry(GC–MS) chromatograms of compounds extracted with ethyl acetate from (A) untreated KL and bacteria-treated KL solution after (B) 72, (C) 168, and (D) 240 h of incubation. The MS-identified compounds with respect to their retention times are given in Table 2.
Compound identified as trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives in ethyl extract from untreated (<24 h) and bacterial-treated (72, 168, and 240 h) KL samples as given in Figure 6.
| 7.67 | Propanoic acid | − | − | − | + |
| 12.54 | 2-Methyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benz[g] indole | − | + | + | − |
| 13.35 | Hexadecanoic acid, 1,5-pentanediyl ester | + | − | − | − |
| 14.71 | 2-Butenoic acid | − | − | − | + |
| 17.35 | Docosane | − | − | − | + |
| 17.67 | Glycine | − | + | − | − |
| 17.73 | 2-Allyl-5- | + | − | − | − |
| 21.43 | Methyl 1-methyl-2-oxo- | − | + | + | + |
| 22.22 | dl-Alanyl-l-leucine | + | − | − | − |
| 22.66 | 1,4-Diaza-2,5-dioxobicyclo nonane | + | − | − | − |
| 22.79 | − | + | − | − | |
| 23.34 | − | + | − | − | |
| 23.55 | 5-Chlorobenzimidazole-2-carboxylic acid | + | − | − | − |
| 23.76 | 2-Non-enoic acid | + | − | − | − |
| 24.03 | 5-Chlorobenzimidazole-2-carboxylic acid | + | − | − | − |
| 24.52 | − | + | − | − | |
| 25.48 | 1,4-Diaza-2,5-dioxo-3-isobutyl bicycle nonane | + | − | − | − |
| 26.36 | 3,4-Diethynyl-1,6- | − | + | − | − |
| 27.29 | Hexadecanoic acid | − | − | + | + |
| 29.30 | − | + | − | − | |
| 29.32 | 1,4-Diethynyl-2,5-dipropoxybenzene | − | − | + | − |
| 29.48 | 2,5-Piperazinedione, 3,6- | + | − | − | − |
| 31.85 | Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl)- | − | − | + | − |
| 31.88 | 3-Benzyl-1,4-diaza-2,5-dioxobicyclo nonane | + | − | − | − |
| 32.04 | − | − | − | + | |
| 32.22 | Thiopheno[b,b′]dicamphore 1,1-dioxide | − | − | − | + |
| 34.22 | 2-Methoxy-6-(trimethylsilyl)benzo[a]fluorene-11 | − | + | − | − |
| 34.65 | 2-Acetylamino-3-phenylpropionic acid, 1-carbamoylethyl ester | + | − | − | − |
| 39.24 | Cholesterol | − | − | + | + |
| 43.34 | 1-Heptatriacotanol | − | − | + | − |
| 43.72 | 1,8-Diphenyl-3,4,10,11-tetrahydro[1,4]dioxino[2,3-g:5,6-g′]diisoquinoline methyl | − | − | − | + |
| 43.73 | 3,5,7- | − | + | − | − |
| 48.47 | + | − | + | + | |
FIGURE 7(A,B) Cytotoxicity of untreated (<24 h) and bacterial-treated (72, 168, and 240 h) KL solution extracts using the NRK-52E cell line, as assessed by (A) MTT assay and (B) calcein-AM assay after exposure for 24 h. MC, medium control. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3).