Literature DB >> 31823652

Neurophysiological Findings and Brain Injury Pattern in Patients on ECMO.

Sung-Min Cho1, Chun Woo Choi2, Glenn Whitman2, Jose I Suarez1, Nirma Carballido Martinez3, Romergryko G Geocadin1, Eva K Ritzl1,3,4.   

Abstract

Introduction. Brain injury is a major determinant of outcomes in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Neurologic prognostication in ECMO has not been established. Absent electroencephalogram (EEG) reactivity and absent N20 on somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) are associated with poor outcome in other types of brain injuries, especially following cardiopulmonary arrest. It is currently known if the same criteria are applicable in patients on ECMO. Methods. Continuous EEG (cEEG) was performed for patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <8 and SSEP data were performed for patients with a motor GCS < 4 in a prospective observational cohort undergoing ECMO at a tertiary center. EEG variables including reactivity were collected. SSEPs were categorized into absence, delay, or presence of N20. Poor outcome was defined as cerebral performance category 3 to 5 at discharge. Results. We present 13 consecutive patients who underwent both cEEG and SSEP. The median time from cannulation to EEG and SSEP were 3 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1-6) and 5 (IQR = 2-7) days, respectively. All patients were in coma and 12 (92%) had poor outcomes. Ten (77%) underwent brain computed tomography, the findings of which explained coma in only 2. Patients (n = 12) with poor outcome had poor variability, absent reactivity, and lack of sleep features with diffusely slow theta-delta background on the EEG. Despite poor outcomes, all had relatively preserved or normal N20 responses. One patient with preserved reactivity and sleep features on the EEG and intact SSEP had a good outcome. Conclusions. Absent EEG reactivity with the preservation of SSEP N20 was associated with poor outcome in comatose ECMO patients. We advise caution in interpreting electrophysiological tests in prognosticating ECMO patients until the patterns and outcomes are better understood.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); prognosis; somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31823652     DOI: 10.1177/1550059419892757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci        ISSN: 1550-0594            Impact factor:   1.843


  9 in total

1.  High incidence of epileptiform activity in adults undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Edilberto Amorim; Marcos S Firme; Wei-Long Zheng; Kenneth T Shelton; Oluwaseun Akeju; Gaston Cudemus; Raz Yuval; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.861

2.  Neuroprognostication Under ECMO After Cardiac Arrest: Impossible is Nothing!

Authors:  Romain Sonneville
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.532

3.  Quantitative Assessment of Electroencephalogram Reactivity in Comatose Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Autumn Williams; Yinuo Zeng; Ziwei Li; Nitish Thakor; Romergryko G Geocadin; Jay Bronder; Nirma Carballido Martinez; Eva K Ritzl; Sung-Min Cho
Journal:  Int J Neural Syst       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.325

4.  Neuron-Specific Enolase Levels in Adults Under Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Jean Reuter; Katell Peoc'h; Lila Bouadma; Stéphane Ruckly; Valérie Chicha-Cattoir; Dorothée Faille; Marie-Charlotte Bourrienne; Claire Dupuis; Eric Magalhaes; Sébastien Tanaka; Camille Vinclair; Etienne de Montmollin; Mikael Mazighi; Marylou Para; Wael Braham; Angelo Pisani; Nadine Ajzenberg; Jean-François Timsit; Romain Sonneville
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-10-15

5.  Neurological Prognostication Using Electroencephalogram in Adult Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Limitations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Sung-Min Cho; Eva K Ritzl
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in electroencephalographic seizures after mechanical circulatory support: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Li; Jingjia Shen; Hong Lv; Yue Liu; Yuye Chen; Chenghui Zhou; Jia Shi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  Early EEG for Prognostication Under Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Eric Magalhaes; Jean Reuter; Ruben Wanono; Lila Bouadma; Pierre Jaquet; Sébastien Tanaka; Fabrice Sinnah; Stéphane Ruckly; Claire Dupuis; Etienne de Montmollin; Marylou Para; Wael Braham; Angelo Pisani; Marie-Pia d'Ortho; Anny Rouvel-Tallec; Jean-François Timsit; Romain Sonneville
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Risk Factors of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Analysis of Data From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.

Authors:  Sung-Min Cho; Joe Canner; Giorgio Caturegli; Chun Woo Choi; Eric Etchill; Katherine Giuliano; Giovanni Chiarini; Kate Calligy; Peter Rycus; Roberto Lorusso; Bo Soo Kim; Marc Sussman; Jose I Suarez; Romergryko Geocadin; Errol L Bush; Wendy Ziai; Glenn Whitman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 9.296

Review 9.  The Importance of Neuromonitoring in Non Brain Injured Patients.

Authors:  Denise Battaglini; Paolo Pelosi; Chiara Robba
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.