Literature DB >> 31823547

[Application of modified internal fixation and fusion for type painful accessory navicular in adults].

Weixin Zheng1, Yan Zhang2, Jingqi Liang2, Hongmou Zhao2, Xiaojun Liang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness of modified internal fixation and fusion in treatment of type Ⅱ painful accessory navicular (PAN) in adults.
METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2017, 29 patients (37 feet) with type Ⅱ PAN were treated with modified internal fixation and fusion. There were 12 males and 17 females with an average age of 41.4 years (range, 18-50 years). The injury caused by sprain in 24 cases and no obvious inducement occurred in 5 cases. All patients received conservative treatment for more than 6 months with no significant improvement. The effectiveness was evaluated by American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score before operation and at last follow-up. The inclination angle of calcaneus, the first metatarsal angle of talus, the inclusion angle of talonavicular joint, and the second metatarsal angle of talus were measured on X-ray films.
RESULTS: Superficial infection of incision occurred in 1 case after operation, and the incision healed after enhanced dressing change. The incisons of the other patients healed by first intention. There was no deep infection or osteomyelitis. All patients were followed up 12-33 months (mean, 25.1 months). X-ray films showed that the articular surfaces healed at 2-5 months after operation, with an average of 3.4 months. No loosening or rupture of internal fixator was found during the follow-up. At last follow-up, the pain, function, alignment scores, and total score of AOFAS were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). The inclusion angle of talonavicular joint, the first metatarsal angle of talus, and the second metatarsal angle of talus were also significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the inclination angle of calcaneus between pre- and post-operation (t=1.097, P=0.276).
CONCLUSION: Modified internal fixation and fusion in treatment of type Ⅱ PAN can effectively relieve the symptoms and obtain good recovery of feet function with less complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Painful accessory navicular; adults; fusion; internal fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31823547      PMCID: PMC8355793          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  13 in total

1.  The relationship between the tibialis posterior tendon and the accessory navicular.

Authors:  E Kiter; I Günal; V Karatosun; E Korman
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Os naviculare: the multi-ossicle configuration of a normal variant.

Authors:  Evangelos Perdikakis; Eleni Grigoraki; Apostolos Karantanas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Sesamoids and accessory bones of the foot.

Authors:  K J Dennis; S McKinney
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.231

4.  Modification of the Kidner procedure with fusion of the primary and accessory navicular bones.

Authors:  E S Malicky; D S Levine; B J Sangeorzan
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Comparison of outcomes of osteosynthesis in type II accessory navicular by variable fixation methods.

Authors:  Ho-Seong Jang; Kwang-Hee Park; Hyun-Woo Park
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.705

6.  [Outcome of accessory navicular fusion for the treatment of the painful accessory navicular bone of type II in adults].

Authors:  Bing Xie; Jing Tian; Xin-wei Liu; Da-peng Zhou; Liang-bi Xiang
Journal:  Zhongguo Gu Shang       Date:  2014-10

7.  Fusion versus excision of the symptomatic Type II accessory navicular: a prospective study.

Authors:  Aaron T Scott; Vani J Sabesan; Jonathan R Saluta; Melanie A Wilson; Mark E Easley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 8.  The accessory navicular.

Authors:  Peter A Ugolini; Steven M Raikin
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.653

9.  Outcome of fusion of a painful accessory navicular to the primary navicular.

Authors:  Jin-Wa Chung; In-Tak Chu
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Longitudinal radiographic behavior of accessory navicular in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Derrick M Knapik; Sahejmeet S Guraya; Keegan T Conry; Daniel R Cooperman; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.