Hui Zhong1, Jianming Chen1, Chengcheng Zhang1, Zhanqing Li1, Sheng Lu2. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, the 926 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Kaiyuan Yunnan, 661600, P.R.China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming Yunnan, 650032, P.R.China.dlusheng@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw implantation via vertebral arch-transverse pathway in clinical application by a prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Twenty-four patients who were admitted between May 2015 and June 2017 and met the selection criteria for thoracic pedicle screw fixation were included in the study. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the trial group (screw implantation via vertebral arch-transverse pathway) and the control group (traditional screw implantation technology), with 12 patients in each group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, cause of injury, injured segment, and the interval between injury and operation (P>0.05). The time of screw implantation was recorded and compared between the two groups. The acceptable rate of screw implantation and the penetration rate of pedicle wall were calculated after operation. RESULTS: The time of screw implantation of trial group was (5.08±1.74) minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of control group [(5.92±1.66) minutes], and the difference was significant (t=4.258, P=0.023). Patients in both groups were followed up 1-2 years, with an average of 1.5 years. During the follow-up, no failure of internal fixation occurred. At 1 week after operation, the screw implantation in trial group was rated as gradeⅠin 54 screws, gradeⅡ in 3 screws, and grade Ⅲ in 2 screws, with the acceptable rate of 93.61%. The screw implantation in control group was rated as gradeⅠin 40 screws, grade Ⅱin 10 screws, grade Ⅲ in 8 screws, and grade Ⅳ in 1 screw, with the acceptable rate of 84.75%. There was significant difference in the acceptable rate of screw implantation between the two groups (χ2=3.875, P=0.037). The penetration rate of pedicle wall in trial group was 8.47% (5/59), which was significantly lower than that in the control group [32.20% (19/59); χ2=4.125, P=0.021]. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional technique, the pedicle screw implantation via vertebral arch-transverse pathway can obtain a good position of the screw canal with higher accuracy and simpler operation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw implantation via vertebral arch-transverse pathway in clinical application by a prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Twenty-four patients who were admitted between May 2015 and June 2017 and met the selection criteria for thoracic pedicle screw fixation were included in the study. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the trial group (screw implantation via vertebral arch-transverse pathway) and the control group (traditional screw implantation technology), with 12 patients in each group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, cause of injury, injured segment, and the interval between injury and operation (P>0.05). The time of screw implantation was recorded and compared between the two groups. The acceptable rate of screw implantation and the penetration rate of pedicle wall were calculated after operation. RESULTS: The time of screw implantation of trial group was (5.08±1.74) minutes, which was significantly shorter than that of control group [(5.92±1.66) minutes], and the difference was significant (t=4.258, P=0.023). Patients in both groups were followed up 1-2 years, with an average of 1.5 years. During the follow-up, no failure of internal fixation occurred. At 1 week after operation, the screw implantation in trial group was rated as gradeⅠin 54 screws, gradeⅡ in 3 screws, and grade Ⅲ in 2 screws, with the acceptable rate of 93.61%. The screw implantation in control group was rated as gradeⅠin 40 screws, grade Ⅱin 10 screws, grade Ⅲ in 8 screws, and grade Ⅳ in 1 screw, with the acceptable rate of 84.75%. There was significant difference in the acceptable rate of screw implantation between the two groups (χ2=3.875, P=0.037). The penetration rate of pedicle wall in trial group was 8.47% (5/59), which was significantly lower than that in the control group [32.20% (19/59); χ2=4.125, P=0.021]. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional technique, the pedicle screw implantation via vertebral arch-transverse pathway can obtain a good position of the screw canal with higher accuracy and simpler operation.
Authors: Sang B Kim; Yougun Won; Hyun Jin Yoo; Lee J Sin; John M Rhee; Sang W Lee; Gi-Soo Lee Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michael N Tzermiadianos; Susan M Renner; Frank M Phillips; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Michael R Zindrick; Robert M Havey; Michael Voronov; Avinash G Patwardhan Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-09-16 Impact factor: 3.134