Pavlos P Kafouris1,2, Iosif P Koutagiar3, Alexandros T Georgakopoulos2, George M Spyrou4,5, Dimitrios Visvikis6, Constantinos D Anagnostopoulos7. 1. Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 2. Experimental Surgery, Clinical and Translational Research Centre, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou St., 11527, Athens, Greece. 3. First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece. 4. The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus. 5. Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus. 6. LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France. 7. Experimental Surgery, Clinical and Translational Research Centre, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou St., 11527, Athens, Greece. cdanagnostopoulos@bioacademy.gr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Texture analysis has been increasingly used in the field of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging with Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), aiming at assessing tumor heterogeneity. The purpose of the present study is to examine the feasibility of performing texture analysis in carotid arteries, investigate the value of textural features as predictors of potential plaque vulnerability using as reference standards histological and immunohistochemical data and compare their performance with conventional uptake measurements. METHODS: 67 different 18F-FDG PET-based textural features were extracted from carotid images of 21 patients with high-grade carotid stenosis undergoing endarterectomy. To identify the more reliable predictors, univariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.80. RESULTS: First measure of information correlation (AUC = 0.87, P < 0.001), large zone low gray level emphasis (AUC = 0.87, P < 0.001), and normalized run length non-uniformity (AUC = 0.84, P < 0.001) were the most optimal textural features for identifying characteristics of plaque vulnerability based on histological analysis. Addition of textural features to target-to-background ratio (TBR) (AUC = 0.74, P = 0.031) resulted in an AUC = 0.92 (P < 0.001), however, this did not reach statistical significance (Pdiff = 0.09). Intensity histogram standard deviation (AUC = 0.87, P < 0.001) and joint variance (AUC = 0.81, P = 0.001) were the most efficient features for signal differential in relation to immunohistochemical findings and provided incremental value compared to TBR (Pdiff = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Texture analysis can be applied in 18F-FDG PET carotid imaging providing valuable information for plaque characterization.
BACKGROUND: Texture analysis has been increasingly used in the field of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging with Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), aiming at assessing tumor heterogeneity. The purpose of the present study is to examine the feasibility of performing texture analysis in carotid arteries, investigate the value of textural features as predictors of potential plaque vulnerability using as reference standards histological and immunohistochemical data and compare their performance with conventional uptake measurements. METHODS: 67 different 18F-FDG PET-based textural features were extracted from carotid images of 21 patients with high-grade carotid stenosis undergoing endarterectomy. To identify the more reliable predictors, univariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ≥ 0.80. RESULTS: First measure of information correlation (AUC = 0.87, P < 0.001), large zone low gray level emphasis (AUC = 0.87, P < 0.001), and normalized run length non-uniformity (AUC = 0.84, P < 0.001) were the most optimal textural features for identifying characteristics of plaque vulnerability based on histological analysis. Addition of textural features to target-to-background ratio (TBR) (AUC = 0.74, P = 0.031) resulted in an AUC = 0.92 (P < 0.001), however, this did not reach statistical significance (Pdiff = 0.09). Intensity histogram standard deviation (AUC = 0.87, P < 0.001) and joint variance (AUC = 0.81, P = 0.001) were the most efficient features for signal differential in relation to immunohistochemical findings and provided incremental value compared to TBR (Pdiff = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Texture analysis can be applied in 18F-FDG PET carotid imaging providing valuable information for plaque characterization.