| Literature DB >> 31823211 |
N Sabel1, J G Norén2, A Robertson1, D H Cornell3.
Abstract
AIM: To analyse the elemental composition of dentine in primary teeth from children diagnosed with Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II (DI) and from normal sound primary teeth using X-ray microanalysis.Entities:
Keywords: Dentinogenesis imperfecta; Elemental composition; Primary tooth; X-ray microanalysis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31823211 PMCID: PMC7415746 DOI: 10.1007/s40368-018-0392-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ISSN: 1818-6300
Fig. 1Un-decalcified specimen of a primary tooth from a patient diagnosed with Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II with polished surface prepared for XRMA analysis. The principle for the locations of XRMA measurements are shown as black stars in which analysis in the 10 points was performed. (D dentine, RC root cementum, White bar = 2 mm)
Number of line measurements (No. L.) and total number of measurements (Tot. no. M.) in the dentine of five normal sound primary teeth (N-01—N-05) and in seven primary teeth from patients diagnosed with Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II (DI-01—DI-07)
| Sample | No. L. | Tot. no. M. |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | ||
| N-01 | 4 | 40 |
| N-02 | 2 | 20 |
| N-03 | 4 | 40 |
| N-04 | 2 | 20 |
| N-05 | 4 | 40 |
| DI | ||
| DI-01 | 4 | 40 |
| DI-02 | 6 | 60 |
| DI-03 | 4 | 40 |
| DI-04 | 5 | 50 |
| DI-05 | 2 | 20 |
| DI-06 | 3 | 30 |
| DI-07 | 2 | 20 |
Fig. 2a–b Un-decalcified specimens of primary teeth diagnosed Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II seen in incident light. a Primary incisor with obliterated pulp chamber. b Root of primary mandibular molar. (E enamel, D = dentine, RC root cementum; White bar = 2 mm)
Mean values (Mean) and standard deviations (SD) for intensity corrections from XRMA analyses of dentine in normal sound primary teeth (N) and in dentine in primary teeth from patients diagnosed with Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II (DI) for the elements C, O, Na, Mg, P, Cl, K and Ca
| N | DI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| 0.21 | 0.014 | 0.21 | 0.029 | |
| 0.17 | 0.011 | 0.18 | 0.020 | |
| 0.67 | 0.007 | 0.66 | 0.015 | |
| 0.66 | 0.006 | 0.66 | 0.013 | |
| 0.96 | 0.007 | 0.96 | 0.014 | |
| 1.00 | 0.004 | 1.01 | 0.008 | |
| 1.02 | 0.007 | 1.02 | 0.015 | |
| 0.92 | 0.0023 | 0.92 | 0.006 | |
Intensity corrections compensate for the matrix effects of the analysed sample and are calculated from the element composition. The apparent concentrations are divided by the intensity corrections to produce the true concentrations
Results from the inductive analyses before pruning and after 0.1% statistical pruning of XRMA measurements in normal dentine and Dentinogenesis Imperfecta dentine showing the location (Level) in the induced knowledge tree for the elements C, O, Na, Mg, P, Cl, K and Ca and the outcome values normal dentine (N) and Dentinogenesis Imperfecta dentine (DI) with corresponding probability values within brackets
| No pruning (number of end nodes = 26) | After pruning (number of end nodes = 11) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level | Element | Outcome (probability) | Element | Outcome (probability) | |
| 1 | Na | Na | |||
| 2 | Na; Mg | Na; Mg | |||
| 3 | C; O; Ca | DI (1.00) | C; O; Ca | DI (1.00) | |
| 4 | C; Mg | DI (1.00); DI (1.00) | Mg | DI (1.00); DI (1.00); N (0.98) | |
| 5 | C; O; Cl | DI (1.00); N (1.00); N (0.75); N (1.00) | C | DI (0.92); DI (1.00); N (1.00); N (0.92); N (0.64) | |
| 6 | C; Na | DI (0.75); DI (1.00); DI (0.71); N (1.00); N (1.00) | DI (0.80); N (0.74) | ||
| 7 | O | DI (1.00); DI (0.75); N (1.00); N (1.00) | |||
| 8 | C; O; Na; P | ||||
| 9 | Mg | DI (0.75); DI (1.00); DI (1.00); N (1.00); N (0.75); N (1.00); N (0.75) | |||
| 10 | P | DI (1.00) | |||
| 11 | DI (0.75); N (0.75) | ||||
The outcome results are given for training set and the test set of data. (Redundant element = not appearing in the knowledge tree)
Fig. 4Knowledge tree induced in XpertRule Analyser after 0.1% statistical pruning using the XRMA values for C, O, Na, Mg, P, Cl, K and Ca in normal dentine and dentine in teeth from patients diagnosed with Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II. Normal dentine (N) and dentine from Dentinogenesis Imperfecta type II (DI) were set as discrete outcome values in the analysis. The values at the straight arrows show the break points for respective element. In order to make the knowledge tree more feasible to read only the values of the left branch (<) are shown, the right branches having the same values after the sign ≥. In the rounded outcome end nodes, the probability (P=) for correctly classified examples is given