Literature DB >> 31822996

Ad libitum water consumption off-sets the thermal and cardiovascular strain exacerbated by dehydration during a 3-h simulated heatwave.

Connor Graham1, Nathan B Morris1, Amy E Harwood1, Ollie Jay2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess whether ad libitum water ingestion of different temperatures is sufficient to prevent dehydration-related exacerbations of thermal and cardiovascular strain, during exposure to conditions representative of a heatwave.
METHODS: Twelve participants (mean ± SD; 25 ± 4 years) exercised for 180 min at 3 METs in 40.1 ± 0.6 °C, 40.4 ± 2.1%RH four times: (i) consuming 20 °C water ad libitum (AL20); (ii) consuming 4 °C water ad libitum (AL4); (iii) replacing no fluids (NOFR); (iv) replacing sweat losses (FULLFR). Fluid consumption (FC), dehydration (%DEH), rectal temperature (Tre), rate-pressure product (RPP), forearm blood flow (FBF), mean skin temperature (Tsk), and local sweat rate (LSR) were measured/determined.
RESULTS: FC was greater in AL20 (1.30 ± 0.41 L) than AL4 (1.03 ± 0.32 L; P = 0.003). %DEH was lower (P < 0.001) in AL20 (0.11 ± 0.76%), AL4 (0.43 ± 0.64%), and FULLFR (0.01 ± 0.12%) compared to NOFR (1.93 ± 0.28%). %DEH was lower in AL20 than AL4 (P = 0.003). In NOFR, end-trial changes in Tre were greater (P < 0.001) (1.05 ± 0.27 °C) compared to all other trials, but similar among AL20 (0.72 ± 0.30 °C), AL4 (0.76 ± 0.25 °C) and FULLFR (0.74 ± 0.35 °C). End-trial RPP was higher (P < 0.001) in NOFR (12,389 ± 1578 mmHg·bpm) compared to all other trials, but similar among FULLFR (11,067 ± 1292 mmHg·bpm), AL20 (11,214 ± 2078 mmHg·bpm) and AL4 (11,089 ± 1795 mmHg·bpm). No differences in Tsk or LSR were observed among trials, but FBF was lower in NOFR compared to FULLFR (2.84 ± 0.69 vs. 3.52 ± 0.96 ml/100 ml/min; P = 0.029).
CONCLUSION: 4 °C or 20 °C ad libitum water ingestion prevented dehydration levels that exacerbate thermal/cardiovascular strain, despite blunted fluid intake with 4 °C water. Higher core temperatures with NOFR are attributed to impaired internal heat distribution secondary to a lower FBF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluid consumption; Hydration; Thermoregulation; Thirst

Year:  2019        PMID: 31822996     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04283-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  5 in total

1.  Carbohydrate hastens hypervolemia achieved through ingestion of aqueous sodium solution in resting euhydrated humans.

Authors:  Naoto Fujii; Akira Sugihara; Kazuhito Watanabe; Takehiro Niwa; Akira Katagiri; Shodai Moriyama; Izumi Miyanagi; Jumpei Kojima; Takeshi Nishiyasu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Ad libitum drinking prevents dehydration during physical work in the heat when adhering to occupational heat stress recommendations.

Authors:  Hayden W Hess; Macie L Tarr; Tyler B Baker; David Hostler; Zachary J Schlader
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2022-07-20

3.  Hydration Efficacy of a Milk Permeate-Based Oral Hydration Solution.

Authors:  Craig W Berry; S Tony Wolf; Bob Murray; W Larry Kenney
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Hard Boiled: Alcohol Use as a Risk Factor for MDMA-Induced Hyperthermia: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jan van Amsterdam; Tibor M Brunt; Mimi Pierce; Wim van den Brink
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.911

5.  Sex difference in initial thermoregulatory response to dehydrated exercise in the heat.

Authors:  Gabrielle E W Giersch; Margaret C Morrissey; Cody R Butler; Abigail T Colburn; Zachariah S Demarais; Stavros A Kavouras; Ollie Jay; Nisha Charkoudian; Douglas J Casa
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.