| Literature DB >> 31822705 |
Sepehr Eslami1, Piet Hoekstra2, Nam Nguyen Trung3, Sameh Ahmed Kantoush4, Doan Van Binh4,5, Do Duc Dung3, Tho Tran Quang3, Maarten van der Vegt2.
Abstract
Natural resources of the Mekong River are essential to livelihood of tens of millions of people. Previous studies highlighted that upstream hydro-infrastructure developments impact flow regime, sediment and nutrient transport, bed and bank stability, fish productivity, biodiversity and biology of the basin. Here, we show that tidal amplification and saline water intrusion in the Mekong Delta develop with alarming paces. While offshore M2 tidal amplitude increases by 1.2-2 mm yr-1 due to sea level rise, tidal amplitude within the delta is increasing by 2 cm yr-1 and salinity in the channels is increasing by 0.2-0.5 PSU yr-1. We relate these changes to 2-3 m bed level incisions in response to sediment starvation, caused by reduced upstream sediment supply and downstream sand mining, which seems to be four times more than previous estimates. The observed trends cannot be explained by deeper channels due to relative sea level rise; while climate change poses grave natural hazards in the coming decades, anthropogenic forces drive short-term trends that already outstrip climate change effects. Considering the detrimental trends identified, it is imperative that the Mekong basin governments converge to effective transboundary management of the natural resources, before irreversible damage is made to the Mekong and its population.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31822705 PMCID: PMC6904557 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55018-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Digital elevation map of the Mekong Delta[30], including the salinity increase rates at multiple stations, the estimated sand mining volumes (scaled with surface area of the circles); The sand mining figures upstream of the VMD are extracted from previous publications[10], but updated within the VMD; the top right panel shows three examples of salinity measurement and the P95 trend lines over 20 years; the top panel shows the names of the lower estuarine distributary channels of the Mekong Delta for reference (coord. system WGS84-UTM 48 N).
Figure 2Various tidal and non-tidal hydrodynamic properties of the Mekong Delta during the peak of the dry season (March and April); cumulative discharge at different stations (a); 5th percentile (P05) of average discharge (b); amplitude of M2 tidal discharge relative to the year 2000 (c); M2 amplitude of tidal water level relative to offshore M2 tidal amplitude (d).
Figure 3M2 phase difference (tidal travel time) between consecutive downstream and upstream stations (coord. system WGS84-UTM 48 N).
Figure 4Cross-sections measured in 2014 versus 2017, showing channel deepening at various locations along the Tien River.
Figure 5Observed[53] SWI, during High Water Slack (HWS) and when available Low Water Slack (LWS), modelled longitudinal salinity profile in two different distributary channels of the Tien River in April 2005, compared to the expected longitudinal salinity profiles, given the new bed levels and the corresponding hydrodynamic response.
Summary of systemic decadal changes in different estuarine distributaries leading to SWI.
| Co Chien-Cung Hau | Depth + 2 m↑ ∴ Tidal Vel. (5%)↓ ∴ SWI (5 km, 1.5 PSU at obs. station) ↑ |
| Ham Luong | Depth + 2 m↑ ∴ Tidal Vel. (7%)↑ ∴ SWI (10 km, 2.5 PSU at obs. station) ↑ |
Figure 6A summarizing diagram on the effect of various processes on SWI within the VMD.