Literature DB >> 31822568

Effects of physical activity calorie equivalent food labelling to reduce food selection and consumption: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies.

Amanda J Daley1, Eleanor McGee2, Sue Bayliss3, April Coombe3, Helen M Parretti3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence that nutritional labelling on food/drinks is changing eating behaviours. Physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) food labelling aims to provide the public with information about the amount of physical activity required to expend the number of kilocalories in food/drinks (eg, calories in this pizza requires 45 min of running to burn), to encourage healthier food choices and reduce disease.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically search for randomised controlled trials and experimental studies of the effects of PACE food labelling on the selection, purchase or consumption of food/drinks.
METHODS: PACE food labelling was compared with any other type of food labelling or no labelling (comparator). Reports were identified by searching electronic databases, websites and social media platforms. Inverse variance meta-analysis was used to summarise evidence. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% CIs were used to describe between-group differences using a random effects model.
RESULTS: 15 studies were eligible for inclusion. When PACE labelling was displayed on food/drinks and menus, significantly fewer calories were selected, relative to comparator labelling (WMD=-64.9 kcal, 95% CI -103.2 to -26.6, p=0.009, n=4606). Presenting participants with PACE food labelling results in the consumption of significantly fewer calories (WMD=-80.4 kcal, 95% CI-136.7 to -24.2, p=0.005, n=486) relative to comparator food labelling.
CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence PACE food labelling may reduce the number of kilocalories selected from menus and decrease the number of kilocalories/grams of food consumed by the public, compared with other types of food labelling/no labelling. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018088567. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calorie labelling; kilocalorie; labelling; meta analysis; physical activity; review

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31822568     DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  4 in total

1.  The Differential Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Consumer Preferences for Healthy and Unhealthy Food Products: Evidence from a Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Xiaoke Yang; Yuanhao Huang; Mengzhu Han; Xiaoting Wen; Qiuqin Zheng; Qian Chen; Qiuhua Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Affordability of current, and healthy, more equitable, sustainable diets by area of socioeconomic disadvantage and remoteness in Queensland: insights into food choice.

Authors:  Amanda Lee; Dori Patay; Lisa-Maree Herron; Ella Parnell Harrison; Meron Lewis
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-06-30

3.  Changes in the Prevalence and Correlates of Weight-Control Behaviors and Weight Perception in Adolescents in the UK, 1986-2015.

Authors:  Francesca Solmi; Helen Sharpe PhD; Suzanne H Gage; Jane Maddock; Glyn Lewis; Praveetha Patalay
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  The Negative Effects of Long Time Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Purchase Intention for Unhealthy Food.

Authors:  Yuanhao Huang; Xiaoke Yang; Qian Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.