| Literature DB >> 31822289 |
Christie M Aguiar1,2, Kareem Gawdat3, Stephanie Legere4, Jean Marshall4, Ansar Hassan1,5,2, Petra C Kienesberger1,5,6, Thomas Pulinilkunnil1,5,6, Mathieu Castonguay3, Keith R Brunt1,5,2, Jean-Francois Legare7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to characterize and quantify cellular inflammation and structural remodeling of human atria and correlate findings with molecular markers of inflammation and patient surrogate outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Cardiac fibrosis; Cardiac surgery; Cytokines; Human atrium; Inflammation; Leucocyte infiltration; Macrophages (MoΦ); NLR
Year: 2019 PMID: 31822289 PMCID: PMC6905054 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-02162-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Flow cytometry gating strategy (a): (i) Flow cytometry ungated dot plot of overall isolated cells. (ii) CD45 × CD14 gating was applied to exclude non-leukocyte events, resulting in a cleaner population of lymphocytes and MoΦ (iii) Followed by a CD11b x SSC positive gate (iv), then a FSC x SSC gate on MoΦ (v), enabling us to visualize the (vi) different macrophage sub-types with the aid of CD16 × CD14 plot. Leukocytes found in the atrium (b): (i) CD45+ cells per gram of tissue calculated from flow cytometry CD45+ data. (ii) Pie chart highlighting the percentage of isolated cells that were CD45+. (iii) Further characterization of the CD45+ population found in atrial samples. c Presence of MoΦ in a section of normal human atrial tissue stained with CD68 antibodies. Scale bar represents 400 µm
Baseline characteristics of patients cohort
| Parameters | SR (n = 9) | AF (n = 9) | Patients (n = 18) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 62 ± 3.3 | 67 ± 3.0 | 64.1 (44–84) | 0.229 |
| Female gender | 22 | 22 | 22% | 1.000 |
| Diabetes | 11 | 11 | 11% | 1.000 |
| EF | 59 ± 4.9 | 44 ± 7.2 | 51.3 (16–78) | 0.114 |
| EF > 50% | 8 | 5 | 44% | 0.200 |
| BMI | 27.6 ± 1.9 | 31.7 ± 3.2 | 29.6 (20–53.7) | 0.292 |
| NYHA III | 1 | 5 | 66% | 0.049* |
| Urgency | ||||
| In-hospital | 4 | 5 | 50% | 0.637 |
| Elective | 5 | 4 | 50% | |
| Procedure type | ||||
| CABG | 4 | 4 | 8/18 | 0.940 |
| CABG + valve | 1 | 1 | 2/18 | |
| Aortic valve | 3 | 1 | 4/18 | |
| Aortic + mitral valve | 1 | 1 | 2/18 | |
| LVAD | 1 | 1 | 2/18 | |
| Clinical frailty | ||||
| CFS class 4/5 | 3 | 6 | 50% | 0.157 |
| Echocardiogram | ||||
| LV diast diameter | 5.1 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 1.1 | 5.5 (4.0–7.3) | 0.422 |
| LV syst diameter | 3.5 ± 0.9 | 4.3 ± 1.9 | 4.0 (2.4–6.9) | 0.623 |
| LA diameter | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 11.1 ± 16.7 | 4.5 (2.8–4.9) | 0.295 |
| E/A ratio | 1.4 ± 1.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.2 (0.5–3.7) | 0.845 |
| CPB | ||||
| Pump time | 120 ± 38.3 | 107.5 ± 33.1 | 114.1 (65–187) | 0.689 |
| LOS (days) | 9 ± 1.9 | 17 ± 3.1 | 12.8 (5–27) | 0.026* |
| Adverse events | ||||
| Delirium | 2 | 3 | 5/18 | 0.598 |
| Stroke/TIA | 0 | 1 | 1/18 | 1.000 |
| CHF | 2 | 5 | 7/18 | 0.050* |
EF ejection fraction, CABG coronary artery bypass graft, BMI body mass index, CPB cardiopulmonary bypass)
*Statistically significant
Fig. 3a H&E stain of normal human atrium. Scale bar represents 200 µm. b Sirius red stain showing collagen fibers stained red, and myocardial fibers stained green. Scale bar represents 100 µm. c graph showing fibrosis was positively correlated with patient age. d table representing salient differences between patients in SR and AFib. e CD45 MFI MoΦ shows no correlation to percent fibrosis. f CD45 MoΦ show statistically significant correlation to hospital length of stay
Fig. 2a, b Flow cytometry dot plots from an individual patient’s atrium and blood respectively. c Bar graphs demonstrating the comparison between the different MoΦ phenotypes in atrium and blood. d CD16 MFI values in atrium and blood. e Individual patient data on CD16 MFI to further show that CD16 MFI shows a similar trend in all patients where CD16 MFI is lower in atrium than in blood. f MoΦ to lymphocyte ratio was significantly higher in atrial samples
Fig. 4Luminex analyses of atrial tissue isolates comparing SR and AFib patients with a normal atrial tissue used as reference value. MMP-9 was statistically significant in AFib patients with P < 0.05. Other cytokines highly expressed in AFib patients were MMP-2, MMP-7, VEGF and CCL-2/MCP-1
Fig. 5Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Platelet to lymphocyte ration (PLR), and CCL-2/MCP-1 were positively correlated with hospital length of stay (LOS). MMP-9 a diagnostic indicator was negatively correlated to LOS
Fig. 6Clinical overview of a potential algorithm to the modifiable and non-modifiable factors of the cardiac surgery patient’s risk for AFib. The modifiable factors are inflammatory, some having prognostic value determined through a LOS surrogate, such as NLR and CCL2, and some with diagnostic value determined as the onset of AFib, such as CD45 and MMP9. Utility of these biomarkers would be independent of on-modifiable factors such as age, sex, height and genetics, which can also contribute to the development of fibrosis in AFib patients. However, fibrosis is to be questioned as to whether it is an incipient cause or correlative pre-condition to AFib in patients, experimental models should be developed to answer this question definitively