Literature DB >> 31822280

Association of vitamin D receptor TaqI and ApaI genetic polymorphisms with nephrolithiasis and end stage renal disease: a meta-analysis.

Tajamul Hussain1, Shaik M Naushad2, Anwar Ahmed3, Salman Alamery3,4, Arif A Mohammed3, Mohamed O Abdelkader4, Nasser Abobakr Nasser Alkhrm4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The deficiency of vitamin D receptor (VDR) or its ligand, vitamin D3, is linked to the development of renal diseases. The TaqI (rs731236) and ApaI (rs7975232) polymorphisms of VDR gene are widely studied for their association with renal disease risk. However, studies have largely been ambiguous.
METHODS: Meta-analysis was carried out to clarify the association of TaqI (2777 cases and 3522 controls) and ApaI (2440 cases and 3279 controls) polymorphisms with nephrolithiasis (NL), diabetic nephropathy (DN) and end stage renal disease (ESRD).
RESULTS: The VDR TaqI C-allele under allele contrast was significantly associated with ESRD in both fixed effect and random effect models, and ApaI C-allele with ESRD only under fixed effect model. Cochrane Q-test showed no evidence of heterogeneity for TaqI polymorphism and a significant heterogeneity for Apa I polymorphism. No publication bias was observed for both the polymorphisms.
CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis identifies TaqI and ApaI polymorphisms of VDR gene as risk factors for renal diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetic nephropathy; End stage renal disease; Meta-analysis; Nephrolithiasis; Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31822280      PMCID: PMC6902508          DOI: 10.1186/s12881-019-0932-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genet        ISSN: 1471-2350            Impact factor:   2.103


Introduction

In human skin, solar rays facilitate the formation of vitamin D3 from 7-dehydrocholesterol. The vitamin D3 undergoes two-step hydroxylation to form 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25-OHD3) and biologically active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3) [1]. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a ligand-activated transcriptional factor requiring 1,25(OH)2D for its activation [2]. The deficiency of 25OHD or VDR is reported to activate renin-angiotensin system resulting in high angiotensin II levels, which damage renal parenchyma leading to increased risk for renal disease [3]. Considering the pivotal role of VDR in maintaining normal renal function, a number of studies have explored the possibility of association of VDR gene polymorphisms with renal disease risk. Among VDR polymorphisms reported to date, ApaI, and TaqI are widely studied for their association with ESRD, NL and DN [4-6]. The ApaI variant (rs7975232), which results in A to C transition, is located in the intron 8 of VDR gene, while TaqI variant (rs731236), which results in T to C transition is located in exon 9 [7]. The rs7975232 (NG_008731.1:g.64978G > T) is an intronic variant predicted to influence splice site changes that might affect the translation of VDR. The frequency of this variant is high as evidenced by 734 and 16,751 homozygous mutants in 1000G and ExAC databases. The rs731236 (NG_008731.1:g.65058 T > C) variant is near the exon-intron boundary (GCTG/attg) and hence likely to influence splicing and thus might affect the translation of VDR. The frequency of this variant is lower than that of rs7975232 with 242 and 7505 homozygous mutants identified in 1000G and ExAC databases. Importantly, genetic studies examining the role of TakI and ApaI polymorphisms in the pathogeneses of NL, DN and ESRD remained ambiguous [4–6, 8–12]. Considering the significance of VDR signaling in the protection against renal diseases and the ambiguity in the studies relating VDR gene polymorphism with the disease etiology, present meta-analysis comprising 2669 renal disease cases and 3342 controls was carried out to clarify the association of VDR gene TaqI and ApaI polymorphisms with nephrolithiasis, ESRD and diabetic nephropathy. Upon reviewer's suggestion the data related this sentence has been removed from the manuscript, regrettably we failed to delete this sentence in our revised submission.

Methods

Data extraction

The literature retrieval was carried out using keywords: vitamin D receptor or VDR, renal disease, nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis, diabetic nephropathy, TaqI (rs731236) and ApaI (rs7975232) in PubMed, Medline and google scholar databases. All the free full texts were retrieved and wherever full text was not available, reprint request was sent to the corresponding author of the respective article. The criteria to include in the meta-analysis were: 1) availability of full text of the article, 2) inclusion of studies involving both cases and controls (either online or through reprint from the corresponding author), 3) availability of raw data on genotypes, and 4) restricting to studies published in only English language. The information related to each study such as first author, year of study, ethnic group or population studied, distribution of genotypes in cases and controls etc. was computed. The decision on the studies to be included in meta-analysis was taken by all the authors of this study.

Meta-analysis

The data computed in four columns wherein first two columns represent the number of variant alleles in cases and controls and last two columns represent the number of ancestral alleles in cases and controls. Log (odds ratio) or effect size and standard error (SE) are calculated based on these four column data. Based on these two parameters, variance (SE2), weight and 95% confidence interval of effect size were calculated. Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics were performed to test the heterogeneity in the association. The plot of 1/SE and Z-statistics was also used as an index to test heterogeneity. The publication bias was based on the rank correlation of SE and v. The fixed effect and random effect models were generated based on Mantel Haenszel and DerSimonian Lair’s methods, respectively. If no evidence of heterogeneity was found, fixed effect model was considered. If test heterogeneity was significant, random effect model was considered.

Results

Figure 1 depicts the data extraction process for the meta-analysis. Of the 16 case-control studies retrieved on the association of TaqI polymorphism with renal disease (Table 1), four studies showed deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium [7, 13–15]. Among the different population groups included in this meta-analysis, the largest being that of Turkish representing five case-control studies [16-20], two studies from India [21, 22] and one each from China [23], Ireland [24], Italy [25], Spain [26] and Croatia [27]. In total, the final meta-analysis was based on the data of 2777 cases and 3522 controls representing 16 case-control studies.
Fig. 1

PRISMA flowchart showing the steps in meta-analysis data extraction

Table 1

Distribution of VDR1 TaqI polymorphism in different case-control studies

AuthorYearCountryRenal disease typeGenotypesC-allele frequency
CasesControl
TTTCCCTTTCCCCasesControl
Wang [23]2016ChinaESRD21519740474358720.310.28
Cakir [20]2016TurkeyNL3544193129100.420.35
Guha [13]2015IndiaNL5882606558770.510.53
Martin [24]2010IrelandDN225327103249327980.410.39
Ozkaya [16]2003TurkeyNL332745030100.270.28
Mossetti [25]2003ItalyNL80104363566130.400.40
Bucan [27]2009CroatiaDN563131460.430.39
Nosratabadi [7]2010IranDN95536463330.640.65
Goknar [15]2016TurkeyNL254112144330.420.41
Tripathi [21]2010IndiaESRD10511538267228740.370.33
Mittal [22]2010IndiaNL566188450160.310.27
Moyano [26]2007SpainNL15231391110.480.31
Gunes [17]2006TurkeyNL3763106173160.380.35
Seyhan [18]2007TurkeyNL273518132520.440.36
Aykan [19]2015TurkeyNL6761366686150.410.35
Han [14]2015ChinaNL102601601640.030.07

The following studies were shown to have deviation from HWE: Guha et al. (p < 0.0001), Nosratabadi et al. (p = 0.0008), Goknar et al. (p = 0.0008) and Han et al. (p = 0.0008)

ESRD end stage renal disease, NL nephrolithiasis, DN diabetic nephropathy

PRISMA flowchart showing the steps in meta-analysis data extraction Distribution of VDR1 TaqI polymorphism in different case-control studies The following studies were shown to have deviation from HWE: Guha et al. (p < 0.0001), Nosratabadi et al. (p = 0.0008), Goknar et al. (p = 0.0008) and Han et al. (p = 0.0008) ESRD end stage renal disease, NL nephrolithiasis, DN diabetic nephropathy Cochrane Q-test (Q: 13.72, p = 0.54) and I2 (0.00) statistics showed no evidence of heterogeneity in association. Egger’s test revealed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.14). The VDR TaqI C-allele, under allele contrast fixed effect model, was associated with renal diseases calculated collectively for DN, ESRD and NL (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03–1.20, p = 0.008). (Figure 2) As shown Table 2, subtype analysis revealed Taql C- allele to be associated with ESRD (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.34, p = 0.03) (Fig. 2). Among the different ethnic groups, Turkish population showed strong association between VDR TaqI polymorphism and renal disease in allele contrast model (C vs. T, OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01–1.42, p = 0.04). Sensitivity analysis revealed that omitting either of the studies had no effect on overall outcome of disease risk.
Fig. 2

Meta-analysis of association studies on VDR TaqI polymorphism vs. risk for renal disease. Forest plot: The terms experimental and control groups corresponds to cases and controls. Number of variant alleles was considered as events with respect to total number of alleles tested. This meta-analysis was based on 16 case-control studies representing seven population groups. VDR TaqI polymorphism was shown to exert risk for renal disease both in fixed effect and random effect models. Funnel Diagram: It is depicting that no heterogeneity in association. Sensitivity analysis: Exclusion of any of the study is not influencing the result

Table 2

Subgroup analysis showing disease-specific risk with VDR TaqI polymorphism

ModelType of diseaseNOR95% CIP value
Allele contrast (A vs. a)Overall161.11[1.0262; 1.1967]0.009
ESRD21.17[1.0171; 1.3357]0.028
NL111.09[0.9673; 1.2356]0.153
DN31.07[0.9250; 1.2322]0.371
Recessive model (AA vs. Aa+aa)Overall161.19[0.9266; 1.5392]0.170
ESRD21.14[0.8497; 1.5235]0.386
NL111.32[0.8084; 2.1503]0.268
DN31.11[0.8527; 1.4432]0.439
Dominant model (AA+Aa vs. aa)Overall161.14[1.0234; 1.2709]0.017
ESRD21.24[1.0367; 1.4863]0.019
NL111.09[0.9148; 1.2930]0.342
DN31.09[0.8737; 1.3505]0.456
Overdominant (Aa vs. AA + aa)Overall160.99[0.8106; 1.2040]0.904
ESRD21.19[0.9904; 1.4233]0.063
NL110.92[0.6575; 1.2975]0.647
DN31.01[0.8261; 1.2289]0.940
pairw1 (AA vs. aa)Overall161.20[1.0117; 1.4232]0.036
ESRD21.26[0.9280; 1.7151]0.138
NL111.23[0.9346; 1.6077]0.141
DN31.11[0.8081; 1.5149]0.528
pairw2 (AA vs. Aa)Overall161.16[0.8525; 1.5857]0.341
ESRD21.01[0.7443; 1.3803]0.932
NL111.30[0.7200; 2.3483]0.384
DN31.09[0.8304; 1.4407]0.524
pairw3 (Aa vs. aa)Overall161.09[0.9167; 1.2888]0.337
ESRD21.24[1.0233; 1.4966]0.028
NL111.04[0.7873; 1.3666]0.795
DN31.07[0.8487; 1.3425]0.577
Meta-analysis of association studies on VDR TaqI polymorphism vs. risk for renal disease. Forest plot: The terms experimental and control groups corresponds to cases and controls. Number of variant alleles was considered as events with respect to total number of alleles tested. This meta-analysis was based on 16 case-control studies representing seven population groups. VDR TaqI polymorphism was shown to exert risk for renal disease both in fixed effect and random effect models. Funnel Diagram: It is depicting that no heterogeneity in association. Sensitivity analysis: Exclusion of any of the study is not influencing the result Subgroup analysis showing disease-specific risk with VDR TaqI polymorphism Of the 13 case-control studies (2440 cases and 3279 controls) retrieved on the association of ApaI polymorphism with renal disease (Table 3), five studies deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium [7, 15, 19, 21, 28]. Among the studies in accordance with HWE equilibrium, 3 studies were from Turkey [16, 17, 20], two from China [14, 23], and one each from Ireland [24] and Iran [29]. Cochrane Q-test (Q: 17.01, p = 0.03) and I2 (48.3) statistics showed high-degree of heterogeneity in association. Egger’s test revealed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.54). The fixed effect model showed positive association of VDR ApaI polymorphism with all the renal disease cases (C vs. A, OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19), whereas, random effect model showed null association (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.93–1.19) (Fig. 3). Sensitivity analysis for ApaI polymorphism revealed that the sources of heterogeneity are two studies i.e. Wang et al. and Tripathi et al. However, overall trend suggests ApaI variant as a risk factor for renal disease. As shown in Table 4, subgroup analysis revealed association of VDR ApaI polymorphism with ESRD (C vs. A, OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15–1.50, p = 0.0001) and no association with NL and DN.
Table 3

Distribution of VDR1 ApaI polymorphism across different case-controls studies

AuthorYearCountryRenal disease typeGenotypesC-allele frequency
CasesControl
AAACCCAAACCCCasesControls
Wang [23]2016ChinaESRD20620739502350520.320.25
Cakir [20]2016TurkeyNL4340152634100.360.39
Ghorbanihaghjo [29]2014IranCH1023131616110.530.44
Martin [24]2010IrelandDN1853231472003221520.470.46
Ozkaya [16]2003TurkeyNL133021450360.560.68
Zhang [28]2012ChinaDN1989741165460.650.64
Han [14]2015ChinaDN250561880820.750.68
Nosratabadi [7]2010IranDN96427963280.590.60
Goknar [15]2016TurkeyNL244212114090.420.48
Tripathi [21]2010IndiaESRD8011662171324740.470.41
Mittal [22]2010IndiaNL4370125771220.380.38
Gunes [17]2006TurkeyNL4058125972190.370.37
Aykan [19]2015TurkeyNL1451451201550.900.93

The following studies were shown to have deviation from HWE: Ozkaya et al. (p = 0.03), Nosratabadi et al. (p = 0.009), Goknar et al. (p = 0.03), Tripathi et al. (p < 0.0001) and Aykan et al. (p < 0.0001)

ESRD end stage renal disease, NL nephrolithiasis, CH chronic hemodialysis, DN diabetic nephropathy

Fig. 3

Meta-analysis of association studies on VDR ApaI polymorphism vs. risk for renal disease. Forest plot: The terms experimental and control groups correspond to cases and controls. Number of variant alleles were considered as events with respect to total number of alleles tested. This meta-analysis was based on 13 case-control studies representing 5 population groups. VDR ApaI polymorphism was shown to exert risk for renal disease only in fixed effect model, but not in random effect model. Funnel Diagram: It is depicting that two studies are contributing to heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis: Excluding two studies is influencing the results

Table 4

Subgroup analysis showing disease-specific risk with VDR ApaI polymorphism

ModelType of diseaseNOR95% CIp-val
Allele contrast (A vs. a)Overall131.05[0.9282; 1.1931]0.4259
ESRD21.31[1.1454; 1.4996]0.0001
NL60.86[0.7193; 1.0175]0.0777
CH11.44[0.7974; 2.5983]0.2268
DN41.06[0.9361; 1.1997]0.3589
Recessive model (AA vs. Aa+aa)Overall131.10[0.8891; 1.3548]0.3865
ESRD21.85[1.3925; 2.4544]0.0000
NL60.77[0.5591; 1.0553]0.1035
CH11.15[0.4482; 2.9300]0.7760
DN41.06[0.8695; 1.2818]0.5840
Dominant model (AA+Aa vs. aa)Overall131.03[0.8131; 1.3008]0.8153
ESRD21.21[0.7844; 1.8716]0.3868
NL60.76[0.5034; 1.1586]0.2049
CH12.13[0.8380; 5.4311]0.1120
DN41.09[0.8749; 1.3545]0.4466
Overdominant (Aa vs. AA + aa)Overall130.99[0.8143; 1.2066]0.9300
ESRD20.91[0.4290; 1.9490]0.8167
NL60.96[0.6559; 1.3933]0.8147
CH11.69[0.7239; 3.9340]0.2256
DN41.03[0.8660; 1.2221]0.7472
pairw1 (AA vs. aa)Overall131.09[0.8006; 1.4779]0.5907
ESRD21.81[1.3275; 2.4638]0.0002
NL60.70[0.4803; 1.0158]0.0604
CH11.89[0.6130; 5.8330]0.2677
DN41.09[0.8307; 1.4252]0.5399
pairw2 (AA vs. Aa)Overall131.10[0.8709; 1.3854]0.4280
ESRD21.74[0.9540; 3.1683]0.0709
NL60.86[0.5968; 1.2327]0.4068
CH10.82[0.2948; 2.2927]0.7082
DN41.02[0.8306; 1.2477]0.8635
pairw3 (Aa vs. aa)Overall131.03[0.7832; 1.3445]0.8515
ESRD21.06[0.5720; 1.9761]0.8464
NL60.79[0.4507; 1.3857]0.4113
CH12.30[0.8331; 6.3500]0.1080
DN41.10[0.8688; 1.3802]0.4417
Distribution of VDR1 ApaI polymorphism across different case-controls studies The following studies were shown to have deviation from HWE: Ozkaya et al. (p = 0.03), Nosratabadi et al. (p = 0.009), Goknar et al. (p = 0.03), Tripathi et al. (p < 0.0001) and Aykan et al. (p < 0.0001) ESRD end stage renal disease, NL nephrolithiasis, CH chronic hemodialysis, DN diabetic nephropathy Meta-analysis of association studies on VDR ApaI polymorphism vs. risk for renal disease. Forest plot: The terms experimental and control groups correspond to cases and controls. Number of variant alleles were considered as events with respect to total number of alleles tested. This meta-analysis was based on 13 case-control studies representing 5 population groups. VDR ApaI polymorphism was shown to exert risk for renal disease only in fixed effect model, but not in random effect model. Funnel Diagram: It is depicting that two studies are contributing to heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis: Excluding two studies is influencing the results Subgroup analysis showing disease-specific risk with VDR ApaI polymorphism

Discussion

Deficiency of vitamin D or defective activation of VDR by its ligand, 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D results in secondary hyperparathyroidism, angiotensin II-mediated renal damage and renal disease pathogenesis [3]. On the other hand, VDR activation suppressed inflammatory cell infiltration and inhibited nuclear factor-κB activation [30]. Likewise, active vitamin D3 and lentivirus-mediated transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) interference effectively reduced renal fibrosis in rat models [31]. These observations highlight the importance of VDR signaling in maintaining normal renal function. Accordingly, a number of studies have investigated the effects of polymorphisms in VDR gene on renal disease etiology. Among these, TaqI, and ApaI polymorphisms are widely studied [4-6]. However, there is a considerable ambiguity among these genetic studies, possibly stemming from sample size, ethnicity or gene-environmental interactions [4–6, 8–12]. To clarify whether TaqI and apaI polymorphisms have a role in renal disease pathogenesis, this meta-analysis comprising 2777 renal disease cases including DN, NL and ESRD and 3522 healthy controls was carried out. The present meta-analysis revealed an increased disease risk for subjects harboring TaqI C-allele under fixed and random effect models. Subgroup analysis based on type of renal disease showed that VDR TaqI polymorphism is associated with ESRD in allele contrast model, whereas no significant association was found between TaqI polymorphism and DN and NL. In the case of ApaI polymorphism, Apal C-allele was found to be linked to ESRD, but not with DM or NL under fixed effect model. Earlier, Yang et al. performed a meta-analysis on 1510 cases and 1812 controls and found no association of BsmI, FokI, TaqI, and ApaI polymorphisms of VDR with end-stage renal disease. Inclusion of more studies benefited the current meta-analysis. The direct role of solar rays in the synthesis of vitamin D is well known. In human skin, solar rays facilitate the formation of vitamin D3 from 7-dehydrocholesterol, which is evident from the presence of higher mean serum vitamin D levels in summer than in winter [32]. Likewise, higher vitamin D levels were found in populations living in regions known to have longer durations of sun exposure [33].

Conclusions

This meta-analysis revealed the association of VDR TaqI and ApaI polymorphisms with ESRD risk. This is the first meta-analysis study to simultaneously evaluate the association of DN, NL and ESRD with renal disease risk. Ethnicity, sample size, gene-environmental interactions appear to be responsible for inconsistencies observed in the association studies examining VDR polymorphisms and renal diseases. The limitations of this meta-analysis include; exclusion of studies where raw data or full text were not accessible and one-to-one correlation between vitamin D3 profile and risk could not be established as no parallel studies were conducted.
  32 in total

1.  Vitamin D receptor genetic variants among patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Gaurav Tripathi; Richa Sharma; Raj K Sharma; Sushil Kumar Gupta; Satya Narayan Sankhwar; Suraksha Agrawal
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.606

2.  Associations study of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with diabetic microvascular complications: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhelong Liu; Lei Liu; Xi Chen; Wentao He; Xuefeng Yu
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 3.  Associations among four polymorphisms (BsmI, FokI, TaqI and ApaI) of vitamin D receptor gene and end-stage renal disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lina Yang; Lan Wu; Yi Fan; Jianfei Ma
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and tubular citrate handling in calcium nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  G Mossetti; P Vuotto; D Rendina; F G Numis; R Viceconti; F Giordano; M Cioffi; F Scopacasa; V Nunziata
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor and the androgen receptor gene associated with the risk of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Rama Devi Mittal; D K Mishra; P Srivastava; P Manchanda; H K Bid; R Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2010-05-27

6.  Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and the risk of calcium nephrolithiasis in children.

Authors:  Ozan Ozkaya; Oğuz Söylemezoğlu; Müge Misirlioğlu; Sevim Gönen; Necla Buyan; Enver Hasanoğlu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mRNA and VDR protein levels in relation to vitamin D status, insulin secretory capacity, and VDR genotype in Bangladeshi Asians.

Authors:  Babatunji-William Ogunkolade; Barbara J Boucher; Jean M Prahl; Stephen A Bustin; Jacky M Burrin; Kate Noonan; Bernard V North; Nassima Mannan; Michael F McDermott; Hector F DeLuca; Graham A Hitman
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Polymorphisms in CaSR and CLDN14 Genes Associated with Increased Risk of Kidney Stone Disease in Patients from the Eastern Part of India.

Authors:  Manalee Guha; Biswabandhu Bankura; Sudakshina Ghosh; Arup Kumar Pattanayak; Saurabh Ghosh; Dilip Kumar Pal; Anurag Puri; Anup Kumar Kundu; Madhusudan Das
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Effects of genetic variants on serum parathyroid hormone in hyperparathyroidism and end-stage renal disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonela Matana; Marijana Popović; Vesela Torlak; Ante Punda; Maja Barbalić; Tatijana Zemunik
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Effects of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms on urolithiasis risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Wei Nie; Hong Jiang
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  1 in total

1.  VDR Gene Polymorphisms in Healthy Individuals with Family History of Premature Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Martyna Fronczek; Joanna Katarzyna Strzelczyk; Tadeusz Osadnik; Krzysztof Biernacki; Zofia Ostrowska
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.434

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.