| Literature DB >> 31822280 |
Tajamul Hussain1, Shaik M Naushad2, Anwar Ahmed3, Salman Alamery3,4, Arif A Mohammed3, Mohamed O Abdelkader4, Nasser Abobakr Nasser Alkhrm4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The deficiency of vitamin D receptor (VDR) or its ligand, vitamin D3, is linked to the development of renal diseases. The TaqI (rs731236) and ApaI (rs7975232) polymorphisms of VDR gene are widely studied for their association with renal disease risk. However, studies have largely been ambiguous.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic nephropathy; End stage renal disease; Meta-analysis; Nephrolithiasis; Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31822280 PMCID: PMC6902508 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-019-0932-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Fig. 1PRISMA flowchart showing the steps in meta-analysis data extraction
Distribution of VDR1 TaqI polymorphism in different case-control studies
| Author | Year | Country | Renal disease type | Genotypes | C-allele frequency | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Control | ||||||||||
| TT | TC | CC | TT | TC | CC | Cases | Control | ||||
| Wang [ | 2016 | China | ESRD | 215 | 197 | 40 | 474 | 358 | 72 | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Cakir [ | 2016 | Turkey | NL | 35 | 44 | 19 | 31 | 29 | 10 | 0.42 | 0.35 |
| Guha [ | 2015 | India | NL | 58 | 82 | 60 | 65 | 58 | 77 | 0.51 | 0.53 |
| Martin [ | 2010 | Ireland | DN | 225 | 327 | 103 | 249 | 327 | 98 | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| Ozkaya [ | 2003 | Turkey | NL | 33 | 27 | 4 | 50 | 30 | 10 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Mossetti [ | 2003 | Italy | NL | 80 | 104 | 36 | 35 | 66 | 13 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Bucan [ | 2009 | Croatia | DN | 5 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 14 | 6 | 0.43 | 0.39 |
| Nosratabadi [ | 2010 | Iran | DN | 9 | 55 | 36 | 4 | 63 | 33 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
| Goknar [ | 2016 | Turkey | NL | 25 | 41 | 12 | 14 | 43 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.41 |
| Tripathi [ | 2010 | India | ESRD | 105 | 115 | 38 | 267 | 228 | 74 | 0.37 | 0.33 |
| Mittal [ | 2010 | India | NL | 56 | 61 | 8 | 84 | 50 | 16 | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Moyano [ | 2007 | Spain | NL | 15 | 23 | 13 | 9 | 11 | 1 | 0.48 | 0.31 |
| Gunes [ | 2006 | Turkey | NL | 37 | 63 | 10 | 61 | 73 | 16 | 0.38 | 0.35 |
| Seyhan [ | 2007 | Turkey | NL | 27 | 35 | 18 | 13 | 25 | 2 | 0.44 | 0.36 |
| Aykan [ | 2015 | Turkey | NL | 67 | 61 | 36 | 66 | 86 | 15 | 0.41 | 0.35 |
| Han [ | 2015 | China | NL | 102 | 6 | 0 | 160 | 16 | 4 | 0.03 | 0.07 |
The following studies were shown to have deviation from HWE: Guha et al. (p < 0.0001), Nosratabadi et al. (p = 0.0008), Goknar et al. (p = 0.0008) and Han et al. (p = 0.0008)
ESRD end stage renal disease, NL nephrolithiasis, DN diabetic nephropathy
Fig. 2Meta-analysis of association studies on VDR TaqI polymorphism vs. risk for renal disease. Forest plot: The terms experimental and control groups corresponds to cases and controls. Number of variant alleles was considered as events with respect to total number of alleles tested. This meta-analysis was based on 16 case-control studies representing seven population groups. VDR TaqI polymorphism was shown to exert risk for renal disease both in fixed effect and random effect models. Funnel Diagram: It is depicting that no heterogeneity in association. Sensitivity analysis: Exclusion of any of the study is not influencing the result
Subgroup analysis showing disease-specific risk with VDR TaqI polymorphism
| Model | Type of disease | N | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allele contrast (A vs. a) | Overall | 16 | 1.11 | [1.0262; 1.1967] | 0.009 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.17 | [1.0171; 1.3357] | 0.028 | |
| NL | 11 | 1.09 | [0.9673; 1.2356] | 0.153 | |
| DN | 3 | 1.07 | [0.9250; 1.2322] | 0.371 | |
| Recessive model (AA vs. Aa+aa) | Overall | 16 | 1.19 | [0.9266; 1.5392] | 0.170 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.14 | [0.8497; 1.5235] | 0.386 | |
| NL | 11 | 1.32 | [0.8084; 2.1503] | 0.268 | |
| DN | 3 | 1.11 | [0.8527; 1.4432] | 0.439 | |
| Dominant model (AA+Aa vs. aa) | Overall | 16 | 1.14 | [1.0234; 1.2709] | 0.017 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.24 | [1.0367; 1.4863] | 0.019 | |
| NL | 11 | 1.09 | [0.9148; 1.2930] | 0.342 | |
| DN | 3 | 1.09 | [0.8737; 1.3505] | 0.456 | |
| Overdominant (Aa vs. AA + aa) | Overall | 16 | 0.99 | [0.8106; 1.2040] | 0.904 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.19 | [0.9904; 1.4233] | 0.063 | |
| NL | 11 | 0.92 | [0.6575; 1.2975] | 0.647 | |
| DN | 3 | 1.01 | [0.8261; 1.2289] | 0.940 | |
| pairw1 (AA vs. aa) | Overall | 16 | 1.20 | [1.0117; 1.4232] | 0.036 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.26 | [0.9280; 1.7151] | 0.138 | |
| NL | 11 | 1.23 | [0.9346; 1.6077] | 0.141 | |
| DN | 3 | 1.11 | [0.8081; 1.5149] | 0.528 | |
| pairw2 (AA vs. Aa) | Overall | 16 | 1.16 | [0.8525; 1.5857] | 0.341 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.01 | [0.7443; 1.3803] | 0.932 | |
| NL | 11 | 1.30 | [0.7200; 2.3483] | 0.384 | |
| DN | 3 | 1.09 | [0.8304; 1.4407] | 0.524 | |
| pairw3 (Aa vs. aa) | Overall | 16 | 1.09 | [0.9167; 1.2888] | 0.337 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.24 | [1.0233; 1.4966] | 0.028 | |
| NL | 11 | 1.04 | [0.7873; 1.3666] | 0.795 | |
| DN | 3 | 1.07 | [0.8487; 1.3425] | 0.577 |
Distribution of VDR1 ApaI polymorphism across different case-controls studies
| Author | Year | Country | Renal disease type | Genotypes | C-allele frequency | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Control | ||||||||||
| AA | AC | CC | AA | AC | CC | Cases | Controls | ||||
| Wang [ | 2016 | China | ESRD | 206 | 207 | 39 | 502 | 350 | 52 | 0.32 | 0.25 |
| Cakir [ | 2016 | Turkey | NL | 43 | 40 | 15 | 26 | 34 | 10 | 0.36 | 0.39 |
| Ghorbanihaghjo [ | 2014 | Iran | CH | 10 | 23 | 13 | 16 | 16 | 11 | 0.53 | 0.44 |
| Martin [ | 2010 | Ireland | DN | 185 | 323 | 147 | 200 | 322 | 152 | 0.47 | 0.46 |
| Ozkaya [ | 2003 | Turkey | NL | 13 | 30 | 21 | 4 | 50 | 36 | 0.56 | 0.68 |
| Zhang [ | 2012 | China | DN | 19 | 89 | 74 | 11 | 65 | 46 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| Han [ | 2015 | China | DN | 2 | 50 | 56 | 18 | 80 | 82 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| Nosratabadi [ | 2010 | Iran | DN | 9 | 64 | 27 | 9 | 63 | 28 | 0.59 | 0.60 |
| Goknar [ | 2016 | Turkey | NL | 24 | 42 | 12 | 11 | 40 | 9 | 0.42 | 0.48 |
| Tripathi [ | 2010 | India | ESRD | 80 | 116 | 62 | 171 | 324 | 74 | 0.47 | 0.41 |
| Mittal [ | 2010 | India | NL | 43 | 70 | 12 | 57 | 71 | 22 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| Gunes [ | 2006 | Turkey | NL | 40 | 58 | 12 | 59 | 72 | 19 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| Aykan [ | 2015 | Turkey | NL | 14 | 5 | 145 | 12 | 0 | 155 | 0.90 | 0.93 |
The following studies were shown to have deviation from HWE: Ozkaya et al. (p = 0.03), Nosratabadi et al. (p = 0.009), Goknar et al. (p = 0.03), Tripathi et al. (p < 0.0001) and Aykan et al. (p < 0.0001)
ESRD end stage renal disease, NL nephrolithiasis, CH chronic hemodialysis, DN diabetic nephropathy
Fig. 3Meta-analysis of association studies on VDR ApaI polymorphism vs. risk for renal disease. Forest plot: The terms experimental and control groups correspond to cases and controls. Number of variant alleles were considered as events with respect to total number of alleles tested. This meta-analysis was based on 13 case-control studies representing 5 population groups. VDR ApaI polymorphism was shown to exert risk for renal disease only in fixed effect model, but not in random effect model. Funnel Diagram: It is depicting that two studies are contributing to heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis: Excluding two studies is influencing the results
Subgroup analysis showing disease-specific risk with VDR ApaI polymorphism
| Model | Type of disease | N | OR | 95% CI | p-val |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allele contrast (A vs. a) | Overall | 13 | 1.05 | [0.9282; 1.1931] | 0.4259 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.31 | [1.1454; 1.4996] | 0.0001 | |
| NL | 6 | 0.86 | [0.7193; 1.0175] | 0.0777 | |
| CH | 1 | 1.44 | [0.7974; 2.5983] | 0.2268 | |
| DN | 4 | 1.06 | [0.9361; 1.1997] | 0.3589 | |
| Recessive model (AA vs. Aa+aa) | Overall | 13 | 1.10 | [0.8891; 1.3548] | 0.3865 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.85 | [1.3925; 2.4544] | 0.0000 | |
| NL | 6 | 0.77 | [0.5591; 1.0553] | 0.1035 | |
| CH | 1 | 1.15 | [0.4482; 2.9300] | 0.7760 | |
| DN | 4 | 1.06 | [0.8695; 1.2818] | 0.5840 | |
| Dominant model (AA+Aa vs. aa) | Overall | 13 | 1.03 | [0.8131; 1.3008] | 0.8153 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.21 | [0.7844; 1.8716] | 0.3868 | |
| NL | 6 | 0.76 | [0.5034; 1.1586] | 0.2049 | |
| CH | 1 | 2.13 | [0.8380; 5.4311] | 0.1120 | |
| DN | 4 | 1.09 | [0.8749; 1.3545] | 0.4466 | |
| Overdominant (Aa vs. AA + aa) | Overall | 13 | 0.99 | [0.8143; 1.2066] | 0.9300 |
| ESRD | 2 | 0.91 | [0.4290; 1.9490] | 0.8167 | |
| NL | 6 | 0.96 | [0.6559; 1.3933] | 0.8147 | |
| CH | 1 | 1.69 | [0.7239; 3.9340] | 0.2256 | |
| DN | 4 | 1.03 | [0.8660; 1.2221] | 0.7472 | |
| pairw1 (AA vs. aa) | Overall | 13 | 1.09 | [0.8006; 1.4779] | 0.5907 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.81 | [1.3275; 2.4638] | 0.0002 | |
| NL | 6 | 0.70 | [0.4803; 1.0158] | 0.0604 | |
| CH | 1 | 1.89 | [0.6130; 5.8330] | 0.2677 | |
| DN | 4 | 1.09 | [0.8307; 1.4252] | 0.5399 | |
| pairw2 (AA vs. Aa) | Overall | 13 | 1.10 | [0.8709; 1.3854] | 0.4280 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.74 | [0.9540; 3.1683] | 0.0709 | |
| NL | 6 | 0.86 | [0.5968; 1.2327] | 0.4068 | |
| CH | 1 | 0.82 | [0.2948; 2.2927] | 0.7082 | |
| DN | 4 | 1.02 | [0.8306; 1.2477] | 0.8635 | |
| pairw3 (Aa vs. aa) | Overall | 13 | 1.03 | [0.7832; 1.3445] | 0.8515 |
| ESRD | 2 | 1.06 | [0.5720; 1.9761] | 0.8464 | |
| NL | 6 | 0.79 | [0.4507; 1.3857] | 0.4113 | |
| CH | 1 | 2.30 | [0.8331; 6.3500] | 0.1080 | |
| DN | 4 | 1.10 | [0.8688; 1.3802] | 0.4417 |