Literature DB >> 31821905

The grounding of abstract concepts in the motor and visual system: An fMRI study.

Marcel Harpaintner1, Eun-Jin Sim1, Natalie M Trumpp1, Martin Ulrich1, Markus Kiefer2.   

Abstract

The grounding of concepts in the sensorimotor brain systems is controversially discussed. Grounded cognition models propose that concepts are represented in modality-specific sensorimotor, but also emotional and introspective brain areas depending on specific experiences during concept acquisition. Accumulating evidence suggests that concrete concepts are closely linked to modality-specific systems, whereas the mere existence of abstract concepts seems to contradict grounded cognition approaches. Here, using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we adopted a theory-driven approach frequently used for investigating concrete concepts to the domain of abstract concepts: We compared brain activation to abstract concepts with a known motor versus visual feature content as determined by a previous property listing study. Carefully matched motor (e.g., fitness) and visual (e.g., beauty) abstract words were presented to 24 participants along with pseudowords while performing a lexical decision task. Furthermore, participants performed two localizer tasks by actually moving their hands (motor localizer) and by looking at real pictures (visual localizer). Processing of motor abstract words specifically activated frontal and parietal motor areas, whereas processing of visual abstract words specifically elicited higher activity in temporo-occipital visual areas, albeit at a more lenient statistical threshold. According to inclusive masking analyses, this differential activity pattern to motor and visual abstract concepts overlapped with brain activations observed during hand movements (pre- and postcentral gyrus) and object perception (fusiform and lingual gyrus). Thus, consistent with the grounded cognition framework, our results suggest that, similar to concrete concepts, abstract concepts related to action and vision are grounded in modality-specific brain systems typically engaged in actual perception and action depending on their conceptual feature content.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abstract concepts; Embodied cognition; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Grounded cognition; Language

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31821905     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  17 in total

1.  Where the action could be: Speakers look at graspable objects and meaningful scene regions when describing potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The spatial grounding of politics.

Authors:  Margarida V Garrido; Ana R Farias; Oleksandr V Horchak; Gün R Semin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-13

3.  Modelling concrete and abstract concepts using brain-constrained deep neural networks.

Authors:  Malte R Henningsen-Schomers; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 4.  Neural correlates of embodied action language processing: a systematic review and meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Chiara Giacobbe; Simona Raimo; Maria Cropano; Gabriella Santangelo
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.224

5.  Motor fluency makes it possible to integrate the components of the trace in memory and facilitates its re-construction.

Authors:  Denis Brouillet; T Brouillet; R Versace
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-12

6.  Look at what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Madison Barker; Candace E Peacock; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 7.  Biological constraints on neural network models of cognitive function.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Rosario Tomasello; Malte R Henningsen-Schomers; Thomas Wennekers
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Intangible features extraction in the processing of abstract concepts: Evidence from picture-word priming.

Authors:  Dounia Lakhzoum; Marie Izaute; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Task-Dependent Functional and Effective Connectivity during Conceptual Processing.

Authors:  Philipp Kuhnke; Markus Kiefer; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Abstract concepts in interaction: the need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions.

Authors:  Chiara Fini; Vanessa Era; Federico Da Rold; Matteo Candidi; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.