Literature DB >> 31821597

Fetal fraction and noninvasive prenatal testing: What clinicians need to know.

Lisa Hui1,2,3,4, Diana W Bianchi5,6.   

Abstract

The fetal fraction (FF) is a function of both biological factors and bioinformatics algorithms used to interpret DNA sequencing results. It is an essential quality control component of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results. Clinicians need to understand the biological influences on FF to be able to provide optimal post-test counseling and clinical management. There are many different technologies available for the measurement of FF. Clinicians do not need to know the details behind the bioinformatics algorithms of FF measurements, but they do need to appreciate the significant variations between the different sequencing technologies used by different laboratories. There is no universal FF threshold that is applicable across all platforms and there have not been any differences demonstrated in NIPT performance by sequencing platform or method of FF calculation. Importantly, while FF should be routinely measured, there is not yet a consensus as to whether it should be routinely reported to the clinician. The clinician should know what to expect from a standard test report and whether reasons for failed NIPT results are revealed. Emerging solutions to the challenges of samples with low FF should reduce rates of failed NIPT in the future. In the meantime, having a "plan B" prepared for those patients for whom NIPT is unsuccessful is essential in today's clinical practice.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31821597     DOI: 10.1002/pd.5620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  20 in total

1.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases induced by triplet repeat expansion by linked read haplotyping and Bayesian approach.

Authors:  C Liautard-Haag; G Durif; C VanGoethem; D Baux; A Louis; L Cayrefourcq; M Lamairia; M Willems; C Zordan; V Dorian; C Rooryck; C Goizet; A Chaussenot; L Monteil; P Calvas; C Miry; R Favre; E Le Boette; M Fradin; A F Roux; M Cossée; M Koenig; C Alix-Panabière; C Guissart; M C Vincent
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Nationwide implementation of the non-invasive prenatal test: Evaluation of a blended learning program for counselors.

Authors:  Linda Martin; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Caroline J Bax; Mijntje J Pieters; Jacqueline C I Y Reijerink-Verheij; Robert-Jan Galjaard; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  NiPTUNE: an automated pipeline for noninvasive prenatal testing in an accurate, integrative and flexible framework.

Authors:  Véronique Duboc; David Pratella; Marco Milanesio; John Boudjarane; Stéphane Descombes; Véronique Paquis-Flucklinger; Silvia Bottini
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: Analysis of a subcohort of the TRIDENT-2 study.

Authors:  Ellis C Becking; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Peter G Scheffer; Julia V M Huiskes; Marinka J Remmelink; Erik A Sistermans; Caroline J Bax; Janneke M Weiss; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.242

Review 5.  Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Abel J Bronkhorst; Vida Ungerer; Frank Diehl; Philippe Anker; Yuval Dor; Michael Fleischhacker; Peter B Gahan; Lisa Hui; Stefan Holdenrieder; Alain R Thierry
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Understanding False Negative in Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Mark I Evans; Ming Chen; David W Britt
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Peter G Scheffer; Soetinah A M Wirjosoekarto; Ellis C Becking; Marjan M Weiss; Caroline J Bax; Dick Oepkes; Erik A Sistermans; Lidewij Henneman; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.242

8.  Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.

Authors:  Liying Yang; Wei Ching Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  High-throughput fetal fraction amplification increases analytical performance of noninvasive prenatal screening.

Authors:  Dale Muzzey; Clement S Chu; Noah C Welker; Albert K Lee; Rachel A S Kjolby; Helen Y Wan; Mark R Theilmann; Diana Jeon; James D Goldberg; Kevin R Haas
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Analysis of cell-free DNA in a consecutive series of 13,607 routine cases for the detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies in a single center in Germany.

Authors:  Heike Borth; Anna Teubert; Ralf Glaubitz; Sarah Knippenberg; Nargül Kutur; Thomas Winkler; Bernd Eiben
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.