Nicholas S Burris1, David A Nordsletten2,3, Julio A Sotelo4,5,6, Ross Grogan-Kaylor1, Ignas B Houben2, C Alberto Figueroa3,7, Sergio Uribe4,6,8, Himanshu J Patel2. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 5. Department of Electrical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 6. Millennium Nucleus for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Santiago, Chile. 7. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 8. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Current risk assessment strategies in type B aortic dissection are focused on anatomic parameters, although haemodynamic abnormalities that result in false lumen (FL) pressurization are thought to play a significant role in aortic growth. The objective of this study was to evaluate blood flow of the FL using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and identify haemodynamic and anatomic factors that independently predict the rate of aortic growth. METHODS: Patients with dissection of the descending thoraco-abdominal aorta (n = 18) were enrolled in a prospective observational study and underwent 4D flow MRI for haemodynamic assessment of the entry tear and FL. Anatomic parameters were obtained by magnetic resonance angiography and baseline computed tomography. False lumen ejection fraction (FL EF) was defined the ratio of retrograde flow rate at the dominant entry tear during diastole over the antegrade systolic flow rate. RESULTS: The median aortic growth rate was 3.5 mm/year (interquartile range 0.5-8.1 mm/year). Entry tear peak velocity was lower in patients with enlarging aortic dimensions (95.5 ± 24.1 vs 128.1 ± 37.4 cm/s, P = 0.039). After adjusting for co-variates FL EF (β = 0.15, P = 0.004), baseline maximal aortic diameter (β = 0.37, P = 0.001) and the entry tear distance from the left subclavian artery (β = 0.07, P = 0.016) were significant predictors of aortic growth rate. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond standard anatomic risk factors, FL EF is an independent predictor of aortic growth rate and may represent an intuitive, non-invasive method to estimate FL pressurization and improve patient-specific risk assessment in patients with type B aortic dissection.
OBJECTIVES: Current risk assessment strategies in type B aortic dissection are focused on anatomic parameters, although haemodynamic abnormalities that result in false lumen (FL) pressurization are thought to play a significant role in aortic growth. The objective of this study was to evaluate blood flow of the FL using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and identify haemodynamic and anatomic factors that independently predict the rate of aortic growth. METHODS:Patients with dissection of the descending thoraco-abdominal aorta (n = 18) were enrolled in a prospective observational study and underwent 4D flow MRI for haemodynamic assessment of the entry tear and FL. Anatomic parameters were obtained by magnetic resonance angiography and baseline computed tomography. False lumen ejection fraction (FL EF) was defined the ratio of retrograde flow rate at the dominant entry tear during diastole over the antegrade systolic flow rate. RESULTS: The median aortic growth rate was 3.5 mm/year (interquartile range 0.5-8.1 mm/year). Entry tear peak velocity was lower in patients with enlarging aortic dimensions (95.5 ± 24.1 vs 128.1 ± 37.4 cm/s, P = 0.039). After adjusting for co-variates FL EF (β = 0.15, P = 0.004), baseline maximal aortic diameter (β = 0.37, P = 0.001) and the entry tear distance from the left subclavian artery (β = 0.07, P = 0.016) were significant predictors of aortic growth rate. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond standard anatomic risk factors, FL EF is an independent predictor of aortic growth rate and may represent an intuitive, non-invasive method to estimate FL pressurization and improve patient-specific risk assessment in patients with type B aortic dissection.
Authors: Thekla H Oechtering; Grant S Roberts; Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Oliver Wieben; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Scott B Reeder Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-11-27
Authors: Julio Sotelo; Pamela Franco; Andrea Guala; Lydia Dux-Santoy; Aroa Ruiz-Muñoz; Arturo Evangelista; Hernan Mella; Joaquín Mura; Daniel E Hurtado; José F Rodríguez-Palomares; Sergio Uribe Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-05-18
Authors: Molly E Roseland; Yunus Ahmed; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; Bo Yang; Himanshu J Patel; Nicholas S Burris Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2021-08-18
Authors: David Marlevi; Julio A Sotelo; Ross Grogan-Kaylor; Yunus Ahmed; Sergio Uribe; Himanshu J Patel; Elazer R Edelman; David A Nordsletten; Nicholas S Burris Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Stanley Chu; Ozden Kilinc; Maurice Pradella; Elizabeth Weiss; Justin Baraboo; Anthony Maroun; Kelly Jarvis; Christopher K Mehta; S Chris Malaisrie; Andrew W Hoel; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Bradley D Allen Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-06-09