Literature DB >> 31821285

Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study.

Alessandro Beltrame1, Paolo Di Benedetto, Chiara Cicuto, Vanni Cainero, Renato Chisoni, Araldo Causero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming treatment of choice in glenohumeral arthropathies with massive lesion of the rotator cuff, due to a gradual extension of indications and new designs that provide better outcome. In this study we compared two different reverse shoulder prosthesis designs, defined as Inlay (or typical Grammont type) and a relatively new model defined as Onlay (that preserves tuberosity bone stock). We analyzed clinical, biomechanical and radiological outcomes, as well as complications of RSA in these two groups.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study on a population of 42 patients undergoing Reverse Shoulder Replacement by a single expert surgeon. We consider 21 patients (group A) who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a curved onlay steam with 145° inclination (Ascend Flex group, Wright medical, Memphis, TN, USA)  and 21 patients who underwent to reverse shoulder replacement with a traditional Inlay Grammont steam (Modular Shoulder System SMR, Systema Multiplana Randelli; Lima-LTO, San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) between August 2010 and October 2018. We studied the following items: active range of motion (AROM), radiological parameters (lateralization shoulder angle LSA, Distalization Shoulder Angle DSA), functional scale (Constant-Murley Score), post-operative complications (infection, aseptical implant mobilitazion, residual pain, scapular notching, fractures, tuberosity reabsorbtion, dislocation, bleedings, nerve palsy, pulmonary embolus).
RESULTS: A significant improvement in ROM and functional score (Constant Shoulder Score) were observed in both groups. Group A (Onlay design 145°, medial tray) provides improvement in adduction, extension and external rotation compared to group B. No significant differences were found in abduction, external rotation and forward flexion. At 6 months follow-up, pain relief was detected in all patients. Although complications occur in a high percentage of patients in literature, no postoperative complications were observed in our cases series.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed how RSA is a real solution to improve quality of life and to restore pain-free shoulder ROM in patients where cuff tear arthropathy occurs. Onlay design 145° may provides better active external rotation, extension, adduction: it is necessary to continue follow up and include more cases to prove these data.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31821285     DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomed        ISSN: 0392-4203


  8 in total

1.  Similar optimal distalization and lateralization angles can be achieved with different reverse shoulder arthroplasty implant designs.

Authors:  Michael Marsalli; Juan De Dios Errázuriz; Marco A Cartaya; Joaquín De La Paz; Diego N Fritis; Pedro I Alsúa; Nicolas I Morán; José T Rojas
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 2.  Innovations in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nels Leafblad; Elise Asghar; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems.

Authors:  Thomas Kozak; Stefan Bauer; Gilles Walch; Saad Al-Karawi; William Blakeney
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 4.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

5.  Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Dolci; Barbara Melis; Marco Verona; Antonio Capone; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-08

Review 6.  The Role of Humeral Neck-Shaft Angle in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: 155° versus <155°-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Lawrence V Gulotta; Sergio De Salvatore; Alessandra Berton; Ilaria Piergentili; Benedetta Bandini; Alberto Lalli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Medialized versus Lateralized Center of Rotation in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Berton; Lawrence V Gulotta; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Ilaria Piergentili; Benedetta Bandini; Alberto Lalli; Joshua Mathew; Russell F Warren; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in a patient affected by Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Francesco Mancuso; Paolo Di Benedetto; Andrea Marchetti; Dario Ghassempour; Alessandro Beltrame; Araldo Causero
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-07-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.