Literature DB >> 31821108

Out damn bot, out: Recruiting real people into substance use studies on the internet.

Alexandra Godinho1, Christina Schell1, John A Cunningham1,2,3.   

Abstract

While the Internet has become a popular and effective strategy for recruiting substance users into research, there is a large risk of recruiting duplicate individuals and Internet bots that pose as humans. Strategies to mitigate these issues are outlined and categorized into two groups: (1) automatic techniques which are often embedded into surveys and (2) ongoing manual techniques implemented during recruitment. Potential limitations of these strategies are discussed, and an example of the prevalence of duplicate data within a substance using sample is provided. Overall, it is recommended that researchers consider the use of routine strategies to mitigate the risks associated with recruiting online samples such as: verifying participant contact information, IP address checks, and ongoing cross-checking of participant information for duplicates, similarities and inconsistencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Web-based research; online recruitment; research methodology; research outcome quality; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31821108     DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1691131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Abus        ISSN: 0889-7077            Impact factor:   3.716


  3 in total

Review 1.  Virtual recruitment and participant engagement for substance use research during a pandemic.

Authors:  Carolin C Hoeflich; Anna Wang; Ayodeji Otufowora; Linda B Cottler; Catherine W Striley
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.787

2.  Recruiting and Retaining Youth and Young Adults in the Policy and Communication Evaluation (PACE) Vermont Study: Randomized Controlled Trial of Participant Compensation.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Christie P Vallencourt; Julia C West; Catherine Peasley-Miklus; S Elisha LePine; Caitlin McCluskey; Elias Klemperer; Jeffrey S Priest; Alison Logan; Bill Patton; Nancy Erickson; Jennifer Hicks; Kathleen Horton; Shayla Livingston; Maria Roemhildt; Erin Singer; Megan Trutor; Rhonda Williams
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Using a consistency check during data collection to identify invalid responding in an online cannabis screening survey.

Authors:  Christina Schell; Alexandra Godinho; John A Cunningham
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.