Literature DB >> 31820458

Exact inference for the random-effect model for meta-analyses with rare events.

Jessica Gronsbell1, Chuan Hong2, Lei Nie3, Ying Lu1, Lu Tian1.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis allows for the aggregation of results from multiple studies to improve statistical inference for the parameter of interest. In recent years, random-effect meta-analysis has been employed to synthesize estimates of incidence rates of adverse events across heterogeneous clinical trials to evaluate treatment safety. However, the validity of existing approaches relies on asymptotic approximation as the number of studies becomes large. In practice, a limited number of trials are typically available for analysis. Moreover, adverse events are typically rare; thus, study-specific incidence rate estimates may be unstable or undefined. In this paper, we present a method for construction of an exact confidence interval for the location parameter of the beta-binomial model through inversion of exact tests. The coverage level of the proposed confidence interval is guaranteed to achieve at least the nominal level, regardless of the number of studies or the with-in study sample size, making it particularly applicable to the study of rare-event data.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exact Inference; meta-analysis; random-effect model; rare events

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31820458      PMCID: PMC7704100          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting.

Authors:  S L Normand
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Generalized linear mixed models for meta-analysis.

Authors:  R W Platt; B G Leroux; N Breslow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.

Authors:  Michael J Sweeting; Alexander J Sutton; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.

Authors:  Theo Stijnen; Taye H Hamza; Pinar Ozdemir
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability.

Authors:  Taye H Hamza; Hans C van Houwelingen; Theo Stijnen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

7.  Fixed vs random effects meta-analysis in rare event studies: the rosiglitazone link with myocardial infarction and cardiac death.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster; Lynn S Jones; Daniel A Salmon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Event Data.

Authors:  Dulal K Bhaumik; Anup Amatya; Sharon-Lise Normand; Joel Greenhouse; Eloise Kaizar; Brian Neelon; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Davey; Rebecca M Turner; Mike J Clarke; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Pooling overdispersed binomial data to estimate event rate.

Authors:  Yinong Young-Xu; K Arnold Chan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  8 in total

1.  Randomized two-stage optimal design for interval-censored data.

Authors:  Guogen Shan
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.503

2.  Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEGEND-T2DM): a protocol for a series of multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Martijn J Schuemie; Yuan Lu; Anna Ostropolets; RuiJun Chen; George Hripcsak; Patrick B Ryan; Harlan M Krumholz; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Response to the letter by Guogen Shan, Hua Zhang, and Tao Jiang.

Authors:  Jessica Gronsbell; Lu Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Optimal two-stage designs based on restricted mean survival time for a single-arm study.

Authors:  Guogen Shan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-01-23

5.  Protocols Used by Occupational Therapists on Shoulder Pain after Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Isis Gabriele De Souza; Raphael Fabricio De Souza; Felipe Douglas Silva Barbosa; Kelly Regina Dias Da Silva Scipioni; Felipe J Aidar; Aristela De Freitas Zanona
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 1.448

6.  Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Punita Grover; Olivier Veilleux; Lu Tian; Ryan Sun; Melissa Previtera; Emily Curran; Lori Muffly
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-03-08

7.  Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data.

Authors:  Jia-Jin Wei; En-Xuan Lin; Jian-Dong Shi; Ke Yang; Zong-Liang Hu; Xian-Tao Zeng; Tie-Jun Tong
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2021-07-03

8.  Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors.

Authors:  Fahad M Al Amer; Christopher G Thompson; Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.