Sho Furuya1, Masanao Naya2, Osamu Manabe3, Kenji Hirata1, Hiroshi Ohira4, Tadao Aikawa2,5, Kazuhiro Koyanagawa2, Keiichi Magota6, Ichizo Tsujino4, Toshihisa Anzai2, Yuji Kuge7, Noriko Oyama-Manabe1, Kohsuke Kudo1, Tohru Shiga1, Nagara Tamaki8. 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita 15 Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan. osamumanabe817@med.hokudai.ac.jp. 4. First Department of Medicine, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. 5. Cardiovascular Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 6. Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan. 7. Central Institute of Isotope Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. 8. Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) is a hypoxia positron emission tomography (PET) tracer. Here, we evaluated cardiac and extra-cardiac sarcoidosis using both FMISO and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in a prospective cohort of patients with sarcoidosis. METHODS: Ten consecutive sarcoidosis patients with suspected cardiac involvement were prospectively enrolled. Each patient fasted overnight (for ≥ 18 hours) preceded by a low-carbohydrate diet before FDG PET/CT but not given special dietary instructions before the FMISO PET/CT scan. We visually and semiquantitatively assessed the uptakes of FMISO and FDG using the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The metabolic volume (MV) of FDG was calculated as the volume within the boundary determined by the threshold (mean SUV of blood pool × 1.5). RESULTS: Nine patients showed focal FDG uptake in the myocardium and were diagnosed with cardiac sarcoidosis. Among the patients with extra-cardiac lesions, FDG uptake was seen in 8 lymph nodes and 3 lung lesions. FMISO uptake was seen in the 7 cardiac (77.8%) and 6 extra-cardiac (54.5%) lesions. None of the patients showed physiological FMISO uptake in the myocardium. The SUVmax values of the lesions with FMISO uptake were higher than those of the lesions without FMISO uptake in both the cardiac (SUVmax: 9.9, IQR: 8.4-10.0 vs 7.3, IQR: 6.3-8.2) and non-cardiac lesions (SUVmax: 17.6, IQR: 14.5-19.3 vs 6.1, IQR: 5.9-6.2; P = 0.006). The MV values of the lesions with FMISO uptake were significantly higher than those of the lesions without FMISO uptake (111.3, IQR: 78.3-135.7 vs 6.4, IQR: 1.9-23.3; P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: FMISO showed no physiological myocardial uptake and did not require special preparation. FMISO PET has the potential to detect hypoxic lesions in patients with sarcoidosis.
BACKGROUND: 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) is a hypoxia positron emission tomography (PET) tracer. Here, we evaluated cardiac and extra-cardiac sarcoidosis using both FMISO and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in a prospective cohort of patients with sarcoidosis. METHODS: Ten consecutive sarcoidosis patients with suspected cardiac involvement were prospectively enrolled. Each patient fasted overnight (for ≥ 18 hours) preceded by a low-carbohydrate diet before FDG PET/CT but not given special dietary instructions before the FMISO PET/CT scan. We visually and semiquantitatively assessed the uptakes of FMISO and FDG using the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The metabolic volume (MV) of FDG was calculated as the volume within the boundary determined by the threshold (mean SUV of blood pool × 1.5). RESULTS: Nine patients showed focal FDG uptake in the myocardium and were diagnosed with cardiac sarcoidosis. Among the patients with extra-cardiac lesions, FDG uptake was seen in 8 lymph nodes and 3 lung lesions. FMISO uptake was seen in the 7 cardiac (77.8%) and 6 extra-cardiac (54.5%) lesions. None of the patients showed physiological FMISO uptake in the myocardium. The SUVmax values of the lesions with FMISO uptake were higher than those of the lesions without FMISO uptake in both the cardiac (SUVmax: 9.9, IQR: 8.4-10.0 vs 7.3, IQR: 6.3-8.2) and non-cardiac lesions (SUVmax: 17.6, IQR: 14.5-19.3 vs 6.1, IQR: 5.9-6.2; P = 0.006). The MV values of the lesions with FMISO uptake were significantly higher than those of the lesions without FMISO uptake (111.3, IQR: 78.3-135.7 vs 6.4, IQR: 1.9-23.3; P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: FMISO showed no physiological myocardial uptake and did not require special preparation. FMISO PET has the potential to detect hypoxic lesions in patients with sarcoidosis.