Literature DB >> 31820116

Automated Reminders Improve Retinal Screening Rates in Low Income, Minority Patients with Diabetes and Correct the African American Disparity.

Christina Mehranbod1, Pauline Genter1, Lilian Serpas1, Johana Macias1, David Campa2, David Bermon2, Eli Ipp3,4.   

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of blindness in the United States. Prevention relies on periodic DR screening, yet overall national screening rates are not optimal, especially in low-income, minority patients. We prospectively evaluated show rates for prescheduled teleretinal DR screening appointments in diabetic patients (n = 301) in a large safety-net clinic in South Central Los Angeles. Patients were predominately African American (n = 88) and Latino (n = 200). Patients received either usual care telephone reminders or automated reminder calls in addition to usual care. The overall mean (SEM) show rate for DR screening, irrespective of reminder method, was low: 54 + 1.03%. Show rates with usual care alone were 46.3 + 2.6%, and with automated reminders added, 59.9 + 1.47% (p = 0.036). Show rate with usual care amongst African Americans was 23.6 + 6.46% compared with 53.2 + 3.41% for Latinos (p = 0.025). When automated calling was added, the show rate doubled amongst African Americans, to 51.6 + 3.96% (p = 0.002) with a slightly higher, non-significant show rate in Latinos. In summary, show rates for pre-scheduled teleretinal DR screening appointments were low with usual care alone in a safety-net clinic, with evidence for a racial disparity amongst low-income, minority patients with diabetes. Addition of a pre-recorded automated reminder call improved show rates, and corrected much of the racial disparity observed. Greater focus on failed appointments as an explanation for low DR screening rates and racial disparities, and as a potentially remediable target with automated reminders, may improve DR screening rates and reduce blindness in low-income minority patients with diabetes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appointment reminders; Automated reminder calls; Diabetic retinopathy; Teleretinal screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31820116     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1510-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  31 in total

1.  Cost implications, deprivation and geodemographic segmentation analysis of non-attenders (DNA) in an established diabetic retinopathy screening programme.

Authors:  Salman Waqar; Gill Bullen; Simon Chant; Rabia Salman; Bijay Vaidya; Roland Ling
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2012-08-24

2.  Diabetic retinopathy screening in patients with diabetes mellitus in primary care: Incentives and barriers to screening attendance.

Authors:  K N D van Eijk; J W Blom; J Gussekloo; B C P Polak; Y Groeneveld
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Evaluation of Diabetic Retinal Screening and Factors for Ophthalmology Referral in a Telemedicine Network.

Authors:  Pooja D Jani; Lauren Forbes; Arkopal Choudhury; John S Preisser; Anthony J Viera; Seema Garg
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Improving Follow-Up Adherence in a Primary Eye Care Setting.

Authors:  Catherine E Callinan; Brianna Kenney; Lisa A Hark; Ann P Murchison; Yang Dai; Benjamin E Leiby; Eileen L Mayro; Joseph Bilson; Julia A Haller
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Assessment of diabetic teleretinal imaging program at the Portland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Authors:  Grace L Tsan; Keely L Hoban; Weon Jun; Kevin J Riedel; Amy L Pedersen; John Hayes
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2015

Review 7.  Disparities in Adherence to Screening Guidelines for Diabetic Retinopathy in the United States: A Comprehensive Review and Guide for Future Directions.

Authors:  Cherie Fathy; Shriji Patel; Paul Sternberg; Sahar Kohanim
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.975

8.  Why do patients not keep their appointments? Prospective study in a gastroenterology outpatient clinic.

Authors:  A Murdock; C Rodgers; H Lindsay; T C K Tham
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 9.  Use of telephone and SMS reminders to improve attendance at hospital appointments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Per E Hasvold; Richard Wootton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 10.  Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review on Patients' Non-Attendance.

Authors:  Rahima Muhammad Kashim; Paul Newton; Omorogieva Ojo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pivotal Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Autonomous Detection of Referrable and Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Eli Ipp; David Liljenquist; Bruce Bode; Viral N Shah; Steven Silverstein; Carl D Regillo; Jennifer I Lim; SriniVas Sadda; Amitha Domalpally; Gerry Gray; Malavika Bhaskaranand; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Kaushal Solanki
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.