Literature DB >> 31820045

Prostate MRI and quality: lessons learned from breast imaging rad-path correlation.

Prasad R Shankar1,2, Matthew S Davenport3,4,5, Mark A Helvie3.   

Abstract

Radiologic-pathologic correlation of Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) scores ensures local quality and offers opportunities to improve future iterations of the reporting system. Tracking positive predictive values of lesion-targeted biopsies helps provide generalizable population-level risks associated with each PI-RADS category and can highlight the sources of variation. While this process of formalized pathologic correlation is somewhat new to abdominal radiology, we are fortunate to have a model to follow which was developed by our colleagues in breast imaging. If the success and multi-national adoption of BI-RADS is an indicator, building a scoring system anchored on a histologic reference is an important step to ensuring diagnostic quality and reliability.

Keywords:  BI-RADS; PI-RADS; Prostate MRI; Quality; Radiology pathology correlation; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31820045     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02343-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  5 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores.

Authors:  Emil Jernstedt Barkovich; Prasad R Shankar; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Long-distance longitudinal prostate MRI quality assurance: from startup to 12 months.

Authors:  Nicole E Curci; Patrick Gartland; Prasad R Shankar; Jeffrey S Montgomery; David C Miller; Arvin K George; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-09

3.  The Director of Prostate Imaging: advancing care for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Daniel J A Margolis; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-09

4.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Masoom A Haider; Anwar R Padhani; Geert Villeirs; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Peter L Choyke; Francois Cornud; Daniel J Margolis; Harriet C Thoeny; Sadhna Verma; Jelle Barentsz; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 20.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.