Literature DB >> 31820009

Screening for congenital heart disease in a Singapore neonatal unit.

Alvin Jia-Hao Ngeow1, Mary Grace Tan1, Jonathan Tze-Liang Choo2, Teng-Hong Tan2, Wei Ching Tan3, Daisy Kwai-Lin Chan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of infant mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a neonatal screening programme for CHD before the introduction of pulse oximetry.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of live births in the period 2003-2012. Cases of CHD were detected through prenatal ultrasonography and/or postnatal examination, and confirmed using two-dimensional echocardiography. Data was rigorously checked against multiple sources. The antenatal detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of the screening programme were analysed for all cases of CHD and critical CHD.
RESULTS: The incidence of CHD was 9.7 per 1,000 live births. The commonest CHD was ventricular septal defect (54.8%). The antenatal detection rate was three times higher in the critical CHD group (64.0%) compared to the group as a whole (21.1%). The sensitivity and specificity of screening was 64.5% and 99.7% for all CHD, and 92.9% and 99.1% for the critical CHD group, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 215 and 103, while the negative likelihood ratio was 0.36 and 0.07 for all CHD and critical CHD, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The CHD screening programme had excellent specificity but limited sensitivity. The high positive likelihood ratios indicate that where sufficient risk factors for CHD are present, a positive result effectively confirms the presence of CHD. The low negative likelihood ratio for critical CHD indicates that, where prior suspicion for critical CHD is low, a negative result is reassuring. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical congenital cardiac defect; neonatal screening; prenatal ultrasonography; sensitivity; specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31820009      PMCID: PMC8801843          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2019167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  29 in total

Review 1.  Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  R Knowles; I Griebsch; C Dezateux; J Brown; C Bull; C Wren
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry: A Worldwide Collaborative Description and Preliminary Outcomes.

Authors:  Anita J Moon-Grady; Shaine A Morris; Michael Belfort; Ramen Chmait; Joanna Dangel; Roland Devlieger; Stephen Emery; Michele Frommelt; Alberto Galindo; Sarah Gelehrter; Ulrich Gembruch; Sofia Grinenco; Mounira Habli; Ulrike Herberg; Edgar Jaeggi; Mark Kilby; Eftichia Kontopoulos; Pablo Marantz; Owen Miller; Lucas Otaño; Carlos Pedra; Simone Pedra; Jay Pruetz; Ruben Quintero; Greg Ryan; Gurleen Sharland; John Simpson; Emanuel Vlastos; Wayne Tworetzky; Louise Wilkins-Haug; Dick Oepkes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart.

Authors:  J S Carvalho; L D Allan; R Chaoui; J A Copel; G R DeVore; K Hecher; W Lee; H Munoz; D Paladini; B Tutschek; S Yagel
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Effect of prenatal diagnosis of critical left heart obstruction on perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  R S Eapen; D G Rowland; W H Franklin
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; William T Mahle; Gerard R Martin; W Carl Cooley; Praveen Kumar; W Robert Morrow; Kellie Kelm; Gail D Pearson; Jill Glidewell; Scott D Grosse; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Prenatal ultrasound screening of congenital heart disease in an unselected national population: a 21-year experience.

Authors:  Jan Marek; Viktor Tomek; Jan Skovránek; Viera Povysilová; Milan Samánek
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Delayed detection of coarctation in infancy: implications for timing of newborn follow-up.

Authors:  K E Ward; R W Pryor; J R Matson; J D Razook; W M Thompson; R C Elkins
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Timing of presentation and postnatal outcome of infants suspected of having coarctation of the aorta during fetal life.

Authors:  C E G Head; V C Jowett; G K Sharland; J M Simpson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Effectiveness of neonatal pulse oximetry screening for detection of critical congenital heart disease in daily clinical routine--results from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Frank Thomas Riede; Cornelia Wörner; Ingo Dähnert; Andreas Möckel; Martin Kostelka; Peter Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39,821 newborns.

Authors:  Anne de-Wahl Granelli; Margareta Wennergren; Kenneth Sandberg; Mats Mellander; Carina Bejlum; Leif Inganäs; Monica Eriksson; Niklas Segerdahl; Annelie Agren; Britt-Marie Ekman-Joelsson; Jan Sunnegårdh; Mario Verdicchio; Ingegerd Ostman-Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness of fetal ultrasound diagnostics in cardiac malformations and association with polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios.

Authors:  Atene Simonyi; Fanni Rebeka Eros; Julia Hajdu; Artur Beke
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.