Literature DB >> 31820003

Health economic evaluations of interventions to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behavior at the workplace: a systematic review.

Nathanael Lutz1, Peter Clarys, Irène Koenig, Tom Deliens, Jan Taeymans, Nick Verhaeghe.   

Abstract

Objective The workplace is an ideal setting to implement public health strategies, but economic justification for such interventions is needed. Therefore, we performed a critical appraisal and synthesis of health economic evaluations (HEE) of workplace interventions aiming to increase physical activity (PA) and/or decrease sedentary behavior (SB). Methods A comprehensive search filter was developed using appropriate guidelines, such as the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) checklist, and published search algorithms. Six databases and hand searches were used to identify eligible studies. Full HEE of workplace interventions targeting PA/SB were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. Two researchers independently performed all procedures. Hedges' g was calculated to compare intervention effects. Outcomes from HEE were recalculated in 2017 euros and benefit-standardized. Results Eighteen HEE were identified that fulfilled on average 68% of the CHEC list criteria. Most studies showed improvements in PA/SB, but effects were small and thus, their relevance is questionable. Interventions were heterogeneous, no particular intervention type was found to be more effective. HEE were heterogeneous regarding methodological approaches and the selection of cost categories was inconsistent. Indirect costs were the main cost driver. In all studies, effects on costs were subject to substantial uncertainty. Conclusions Due to small effects and uncertain impact on costs, the economic evidence of worksite PA/SB-interventions remains unclear. Future studies are needed to determine effective strategies. The HEE of such interventions should be developed using guidelines and validated measures for productivity costs. Additionally, studies should model the long-term costs and effects because of the long pay-back time of PA/SB interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31820003     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evidence base of economic evaluations of workplace-based interventions reducing occupational sitting time: an integrative review.

Authors:  Sanaz Akhavan Rad; Frank Kiwanuka; Raija Korpelainen; Paulus Torkki
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Developing a cost-estimation model for work-related stress: An absence-based estimation using data from two Italian case studies.

Authors:  Simone Russo; Matteo Ronchetti; Cristina Di Tecco; Antonio Valenti; Aditya Jain; Francesco Saverio Mennini; Stavroula Leka; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Linking Emotional Intelligence, Physical Activity and Aggression among Undergraduates.

Authors:  José Luis Ubago-Jiménez; Mar Cepero-González; Asunción Martínez-Martínez; Fátima Chacón-Borrego
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  What are the economic dimensions of occupational health and how should they be measured? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Nathanael Lutz; Lena Dalle Grave; Dirk Richter; Tom Deliens; Nick Verhaeghe; Jan Taeymans; Peter Clarys
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Economic evaluations in occupational health: what brings the best bang for the buck?

Authors:  Johanna M van Dongen; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.492

6.  Hospitalization and ambulatory costs related to breast cancer due to physical inactivity in the Brazilian state capitals.

Authors:  Diego Augusto Santos Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cost and cost-effectiveness of the 'Stand and Move at Work' multicomponent intervention to reduce workplace sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk.

Authors:  Tzeyu L Michaud; Wen You; Paul A Estabrooks; Krista Leonard; Sarah A Rydell; Sarah L Mullane; Mark A Pereira; Matthew P Buman
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.492

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.