| Literature DB >> 31819881 |
Yasmin O El Amir1,2, Wisam Omar1, Amani Y Khabrani1, Amani E Jahfali1, Shahd M Alhakami1, Nada M Dobab1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to inspect the ameliorative effect of avenanthramides (AVA) on CP nephrotoxicity in Sprague-Dawley rats.Entities:
Keywords: Avenanthramides; TNF-α; cisplatin; histopathology; nephrotoxicity; rats
Year: 2019 PMID: 31819881 PMCID: PMC6882723 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2019.f377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Figure 1.Summary of the experimental design.
Effect of CP and AVA treatment on body weight, kidney weight, and relative weight of kidney of rats.
| Relative weight of kidneys (%) | Kidney weight (gm) | Body weight (gm) | Groups |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.39 ± 0.017 | 0.92 ± 006 | 234.6 ± 8.26 | Control group |
|
0.83 ± 0.05[ | 0.98 ± 007 | 229.6 ± 5.92 | CP group |
|
0.85 ± 0.046[ | 0.97 ± 006 | 225.8 ± 3.14 | CP + AVA group |
| 0.45 ± 0.028 | 1.03 ± 007 | 217.6 ± 5.45 | AVA |
Values are presented as mean ± SE.
Statistical significance when compared with the control group (p < 005).
Effect of CP and AVA treatment on creatinine, BUN, and TNF-α.
| Groups | Creatinine (mg/dl) | BUN (mg/dl) | TNF-α (pg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 50.3 ± 0.0.3 | 74.60 ± 1.72 |
| CP group |
1.69 ± 0.35[ | 51.2 ± 0.5 |
256.67 ± 8.82[ |
| CP+AVA group |
0.76 ± 0.064[ | 50.1 ± 0.4 |
166.6 ± 12.01[ |
| AVA group | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 47.8 ± 1.6 | 77.83 ± 1.36 |
Values are presented as mean ± SE.
Statistical significance when compared with the control group (p < 05).
Indicates statistical significance when compared with the CP group (p < 005).
Effect of CP and AVA treatment on body weight, kidney weight, and relative weight of kidney (in gm) of rats.
| Blood parameters | Control group | CP group | CP + AVA group | AVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBCs (109/l) | 11.76 ± 0.02 |
2.37 ± 0.4[ |
2.65 ± 0.4[ | 11.06 ± 0.3 |
| Lymphocytes (109/l) | 8.2 ± 0.3 |
1.6 ± 0.9[ |
1.1 ± 0.2[ | 7.6 ± 0.16 |
| Granulocyte (109/l) | 2.37 ± 0.05 |
0.4 ± 0.02[ |
0.69 ± 0.28[ | 2.1 ± 0.2 |
| RBCs (1012/l) | 8.19 ± 0.3 | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 7.45 ± 0.15 | 7.7 ± 0.1 |
| Hb (g/dl) | 17.3 ± 0.04 | 13.9 ± 2.0 | 14.4 ± 0.27 | 17.2 ± 0.19 |
| PLT (109/l) | 434 ± 18.0 | 191.5 ± 67.5 | 291.7 ± 88.47 | 394.5 ± 28.5 |
Values are presented as mean ± SE.
Statistical significance when compared with the control group (p < 005).
WBCs = white blood cells; RBC = red blood cells; HB = hemoglobin, PLT = platelets.
Summary of lesions score.
| Lesions | Control group | CP group | CP+AVA group | AVA group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vascular changes: | ||||
| Congestion | − | +++ | + | − |
| Hemorrhage | − | +++ | + | − |
| Edema | ++ | ++ | ||
| Vacuolation of renal | ||||
| tubular epithelium | − | +++ | + | − |
| Coagulative necrosis | − | +++ | + | − |
| Hyaline casts | − | +++ | + | − |
− (0 rat), + (1–2 rats), ++ (3–4 rats), +++ (5 rats)
Figure 2.Kidneys of control and CP groups. (A) Control kidney showing normal renal corpuscles and renal tubules. (B)–(F) CP treated group B Congestion C Hemorrhage (arrows). (D) Vacuolation of renal tubular epithelium (arrow) and coagulative necrosis of epithelium in which there is increased eosinophilia of cytoplasm and pyknosis of nucleus (arrow heads). (E) Necrosis of renal tubules with debris in the lumen (arrows). (F) Hyaline casts (arrows). Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain.
Figure 3.Kidneys of CP + AVA and AVA treated groups. (A) CP + AVA group.Vacuolation of some renal tubules and necrobiotic changes in renal tubular epithelium. (B) AVA group. Normal kidney architecture. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain.