| Literature DB >> 31819869 |
Saber Kotb1, Moustafa Ahmed1, Dalia Hassan1, Esraa Soltan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was considered to explore the possible impacts of drinking water quality from different sources on the bioavailability of doxycycline.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic stability; bio-availability; doxycycline; metals and water quality
Year: 2019 PMID: 31819869 PMCID: PMC6882722 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2019.f365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Figure 1.Localities of the selected sampling sites on Google map.
Mean values of water quality parameters, heavy metals concentration and doxycycline residues in different water sources.
| Water source | Water quality parameters & Heavy metals concentration | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | EC (dc/m) | T.D.S (mg/l) | T.H (mg/l) | Ca+2 (mg/l) | Mg+2 (mg/l) | Na+ (mg/l) | Cl− (mg/l) | Ni (mg/l) | Fe (mg/l) | Cu (mg/l) | Zn (mg/l) | Doxycycline residues | |
| Tap water | 8.27 ± 0.24 | 0.69 ± 0.33 | 438.89 ± 209.55 | 208.75 ± 66.86 | 77.5 ± 50.36 | 131.25 ± 67.07 | 67.93 ± 52.86 | 53.25 ± 38.14 | ND | 4.41 ± 2.29 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.59 ± 0.32 | 00 ± 00 |
| Ground water | 8.53 ± 0.35 | 1.05 ± 0.33 | 617.54 ± 267.67 | 264.28 ± 89.41 | 52.85 ± 11.12 | 211.42 ± 92.81 | 156.18 ± 78.76 | 49.68 ± 19.63 | ND | 6.47 ± 3.58 | 0.519 ± 0.073 | 0.48 ± 0.32 | 00 ± 00 |
| 0.120 | 0.51 | 0.120 | 0.193 | 0.229 | 0.075 | 0.023 | 0.828 | — | 0.201 | 0.889 | 0.500 | — | |
ND = Not Detected;
p-value < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Statistical analysis of doxycycline profile after several times adding in different water sources.
| Watersources | Mean ± S.D. | Mean ± S.D. of doxycycline concentrations (mg/l) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After 1 h | After 3 h | After 5 h | After 8 h | ||
| Tap water | Mean ± S.D. | 294.3 ± 0.81 | 271.1 ± 1.41 | 232.8 ± 1.66 | 207.5 ± 1.78 |
| 0.047 | 0.035 | 0.034 | 0.033 | ||
| Ground water | Mean ± S.D. | 293.5 ± 0.74 | 248.5 ± 1.36 | 214.2 ± 1.76 | 179.7 ± 1.98 |
| 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||
| Control (therapeutic dose) | Mean ± S.D. | 300 ± 0 | 300 ± 0 | 300 ± 0 | 300 ± 0 |
p-value < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Figure 2.Reduction (%) of doxycycline therapeutic doses in different water sources after several times.
Statistical correlations between the decrease in doxycycline therapeutic concentration and different water parameters in different water sources.
| Water parameters | Tap water | Ground water | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 0.772 | 0.025 | 0.685 | 0.05 |
| Electrical conductivity (EC) (dc/m) | 0.312 | 0.451 | 0.180 | 0.699 |
| Total dissolved solids (TDS) (μg/l) | 0.309 | 0.457 | 0.523 | 0.229 |
| Total Hardness (TH) (μg/l) | 0.495 | 0.213 | −0.064 | 0.892 |
| Calcium ions (Ca+2) (μg/l) | −0.234 | 0.576 | −0.389 | 0.388 |
| Magnesium ions (Mg+2) (μg/l) | 0.828 | 0.011 | −0.110 | 0.814 |
| Sodium ions (Na+) (μg/l) | 0.309 | 0.457 | 0.227 | 0.624 |
| Chloride (Cl−) (μg/l) | 0.207 | 0.623 | 0.064 | 0.891 |
| Nickle (Ni) (μg/l) | – | – | – | – |
| Iron (Fe) (μg/l) | −0.206 | 0.625 | −0.378 | 0.403 |
| Copper (Cu) (μg/l) | −0.051 | 0.904 | −0.018 | 0.969 |
| Zinc (μg/l) | 0.077 | 0.856 | 0.234 | 0.613 |
p-value < 0.05 is statistically significant.