| Literature DB >> 31819651 |
Yu Qian1,2, Yuan Wu3, Zilong Yuan4, Xiaohui Niu5, Yaoyao He4, Jun Peng6, Fuxiang Zhou1, Shaozhong Wei7, Desheng Hu3, Yunfeng Zhou1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) have been found to correlate with treatment response and prognosis in some cancers; however, such correlations have not been reported in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We aimed to determine the relationship between CTCs and the treatment response in NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we ascertained the karyotype of CTCs and identified a possible correlation between karyotype and treatment response in locally advanced NPC (LANPC). We prospectively collected peripheral blood from LANPC patients. CTCs were measured by negative enrichment with immunofluorescence in situ hybridization (imFISH) and a centromere of chromosome 8 (CEP8) probe. Chromosome 8 was karyotyped in CTCs, which were identified as triploid, tetraploid or multiploid. Patients were then treated with platinum-based induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. CTCs were measured before and after treatment.Entities:
Keywords: CTC; NPC; chemoradiotherapy; therapeutic efficacy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31819651 PMCID: PMC6897263 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S222916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Figure 1Typical CTCs and white blood cells. (A) imFISH identified DAPI-positive, CD45-negative CTCs with more than two CEP8 signals and DAPI-positive, CD45-positive white blood cells with two CEP8 signals. (B) CTCs according to the number of CEP8 signals: 3, triploid; 4, tetraploid; and 5 or more, multiploid. Arrows indicate CTCcells.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with and Without Circulating Tumor Cells
| No. of Patients (%) | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | CTC-Negative (N=23) | CTC-Positive (N=27) | ||
| Male | 30 (60) | 13 (57) | 17 (63) | 0.64 |
| Female | 20(40) | 10(43) | 10(37) | |
| <40 | 6(12) | 2 (9) | 4 (15) | 0.60 |
| 40–60 | 36 (72) | 16 (70) | 20 (74) | |
| >60 | 8 (16) | 5 (22) | 3 (11) | |
| Positive | 10 (20) | 5 (22) | 5 (19) | 1.0 |
| With positive family history | 16(32) | 9(39) | 7(26) | 0.32 |
| Positivea | 25 (50) | 12 (52) | 13 (48) | 0.77 |
| III | 28 (56) | 12 (52) | 16 (59) | 0.86 |
| IVa | 15 (30) | 8 (35) | 7 (26) | |
| IVb | 7(14) | 3(13) | 4(15) | |
| T2 | 6 (12) | 2 (9) | 4 (15) | 0.66 |
| T3 | 28 (56) | 12 (52) | 16 (59) | |
| T4 | 16 (32) | 9 (39) | 7 (26) | |
| N0–N1 | 11 (22) | 6 (26) | 5 (19) | 0.66 |
| N2 | 32 (64) | 14 (61) | 18 (67) | |
| N3 | 7 (14) | 3 (13) | 4 (15) | |
Note: aIncludes both former and current smokers.
Figure 2The change in total CTC count before and after treatment in baseline CTC-positive LANPC patients. **P<0.001.
CTC Changes Among Patients with and Without Complete Response to Treatment
| No. of CTC (Mean ± SD) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Before Treatment | After Treatment | ||
| Patients with CR | |||
| Triploidy | 2.61±2.25 | 0.91±2.37 | 0.017 |
| Tetraploidy | 0.48±0.67a | 0.09±0.29 | 0.015 |
| Multiploidy | 0.61±0.89 | 0 | 0.003 |
| Patients without CR | |||
| Triploidy | 5.67±7.45 | 0.5±0.84 | 0.151 |
| Tetraploidy | 2.00±2.27a | 0 | 0.136 |
| Multiploidy | 1.67±1.97 | 0.17±0.41 | 0.122 |
Notes: aNumbers of tetraploidy CTC before treatment was significantly different among patients with CR and patients without CR (P=0.019).
Abbreviations: CR, complete response; CTC, circulating tumor cell; NS, not significant; SD, standard deviation.
Univariate and Multivariate Regression Analyses of Predictors for Complete Response to the Treatment in Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharynx Carcinoma
| Variable | Univariatea | Multivariateb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-Value | OR (95% CI) | P-Value | |
| Age | 1.1 (1.1–1.2) | 0.008 | 1.1 (1.1–1.3) | 0.005 |
| Gender | 2.6 (0.8–8.3) | 0.11 | ||
| Positive total CTC | 0.5 (0.1–1.4) | 0.17 | ||
| Triploidy CTC | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 0.31 | ||
| Tetraploidy CTC | 0.5(0.2–1.1) | 0.045 | ||
| Multiploidy CTC | 0.5(0.2–1.2) | 0.09 | ||
Notes: aUnivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate variables as potential predictors of complete response to the treatment. Variables included, age, gender, TNM stage, positivity of circulating tumor cells; bmultivariate analysis was performed using the backward method.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CTC, circulating tumor cells.
The Correlation Between the Number of Positive CTC Before Treatment and Clinical Response After Treatment and During Follow-Up
| Clinical Response | No. of Patients | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTC-Negative | CTC-Positive | ||
| After treatment | |||
| CR | 13 | 10 | 0.17 |
| Non-CR | 10 | 17 | |
| First follow-upa | |||
| CR | 13 | 17 | 0.64 |
| Non-CR | 10 | 10 | |
| Second follow-upb | |||
| CR | 17 | 18 | 0.58 |
| Non-CR | 6 | 9 | |
Notes: aThree months after the treatment; bthree years after the treatment.
Abbreviations: CR, complete response; CTC, circulating tumor cell.
Progression-Free and Overall Survival in LANPC Patients with Circulating Tumor Cells
| No. of Patients | No. of Relapses (%) | PFS Rate at 2 Years (95% CI) | p Value by log rank test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTC-positive | 27 | 7 (26%) | 75% (0.6–0.9) | 0.03 |
| CTC-negative | 23 | 1 (4%) | 92% (0.8–1.0) | |
| CTC-positive | 27 | 3 (11%) | 91% (0.8–1.0) | 0.09 |
| CTC-negative | 23 | 0 (0) | 100% |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CTC, circulating tumor cells; No, number; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.