| Literature DB >> 31819082 |
M K Srivastava1,2, X-S Qiu1, Y Y Chin3, S H Hsieh1,4, Y C Shao1, Y-H Liang1, C-H Lai1, C H Du1, H T Wang1,5, J W Chiou6, Y C Lai4, H M Tsai4, C W Pao4, H J Lin4, J F Lee4, K Asokan7, W F Pong8.
Abstract
Temperature-dependent X-ray absorption near-edge structures, X-ray linear dichroism (XLD) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopic techniques were used to investigate the valence state, preferred orbital and local atomic structure that significantly affect the electrical and magnetic properties of a single crystal of YBaCuFeO5 (YBCFO). An onset of increase of resistivity at ~180 K, followed by a rapid increase at/below 125 K, is observed. An antiferromagnetic (AFM)-like transition is close to the temperature at which the resistivity starts to increase in the ab-plane and is also observed with strong anisotropy between the ab-plane and the c-axis. The XLD spectra at the Fe L3,2-edge revealed a change in Fe 3d eg holes from the preferential [Formula: see text] orbital at high temperature (300-150 K) to the [Formula: see text] orbital at/below 125 K. The analysis of the Fe K-edge EXAFS data of YBCFO further revealed an unusual increase in the Debye-Waller factor of the nearest-neighbor Fe-O bond length at/below 125 K, suggesting phonon-softening behavior, resulting in the breaking of lattice symmetry, particularly in the ab-plane of Fe-related square pyramids. These findings demonstrate a close correlation between electrical resistivity and coupling of the preferred Fe 3d orbital with lattice distortion of a single crystal of YBCFO.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31819082 PMCID: PMC6901513 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54772-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Room-temperature X-ray powder diffraction pattern with Rietveld refinement (P4/mmm space group). Cross marks, a red curve and vertical tick marks indicate the observed pattern, calculated profile and Bragg peaks, respectively. The bottom curve shows the difference between observed and calculated intensities. (b,c) Three dimensional crystal cell and two dimensional magnetic structures of YBCFO, respectively.
Figure 2ρ and χ vs. T for single crystal YBCFO measured in the -plane and along -axis. Inset magnifies ρ vs. T curve.
Figure 3(a) Fe K-edge XANES spectra of YBCFO recorded at various temperatures for θ = 0° and (b) θ = 70°, with corresponding first derivatives (bottom); (c) Cu K-edge XANES spectra of YBCFO recorded at various temperatures for θ = 0° and (d) θ = 70°, with corresponding first derivatives (bottom). XANES spectra of reference samples at room temperature are also presented for comparison.
Figure 4(a) Normalized Fe L3,2-edge XANES spectra (for θ = 0° and 70°) and XLD (bottom panel) of YBCFO. (b) Normalized Cu L3,2-edge XANES spectra (for θ = 0° and 70°) and XLD (bottom panel) of YBCFO.
Figure 5(a) Temperature-dependence of amplitudes of Fourier transform of EXAFS at Fe K-edge of single crystal of YBCFO for θ = 0° and (b) θ = 70°. Inset represents corresponding k3χ data. Solid profile is obtained from raw data, whereas circular marks represent best fit for first coordination shell.
Coordination number (N), DWF (σ2) and NN Fe-O bond length (R) obtained from fitted temperature-dependent EXAFS spectra at Fe K-edge for θ = 0° and 70°.
| Temperature | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | R (Å) | σ2 (Å−2) × 10−3 | N | R (Å) | σ2 (Å−2) × 10−3 | |
| 300 K | 4 | 2.00 ± 0.02 | 7.2 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.87 ± 0.02 | 1.5 ± 0.3 |
| 200 K | 4 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.88 ± 0.02 | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| 175 K | 4 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.88 ± 0.02 | 1.3 ± 0.3 |
| 150 K | 4 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.88 ± 0.02 | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| 125 K | 4 | 2.03 ± 0.02 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.88 ± 0.02 | 0.9 ± 0.3 |
| 115 K | 4 | 2.02 ± 0.02 | 5.1 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.88 ± 0.02 | 2.1 ± 0.3 |
| 100 K | 4 | 2.00 ± 0.02 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.88 ± 0.02 | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
Figure 6(a) Temperature-dependence of amplitudes of Fourier transform of EXAFS at Cu K-edge of single crystal of YBCFO for θ = 0° and (b) θ = 70°. Inset represents corresponding k3χ data. Solid profile is obtained from raw data, whereas circular marks represent best fit for first coordination shell.
Coordination number (N), DWF (σ2) and NN Cu-O bond length (R) obtained from fitted temperature-dependent EXAFS spectra at Cu K-edge for θ = 0° and 70°.
| Temperature | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | R (Å) | σ2 (×10−3 Å−2) | N | R (Å) | σ2 (×10−3 Å−2) | |
| 300 K | 4 | 1.95 ± 0.02 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 6.1 ± 0.3 |
| 200 K | 4 | 1.95 ± 0.02 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 5.2 ± 0.3 |
| 175 K | 4 | 1.96 ± 0.02 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 4.6 ± 0.3 |
| 150 K | 4 | 1.95 ± 0.02 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 3.1 ± 0.3 |
| 125 K | 4 | 1.94 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 2.1 ± 0.3 |
| 115 K | 4 | 1.94 ± 0.02 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
| 100 K | 4 | 1.95 ± 0.02 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
Figure 7(a) Variation of NN Fe/Cu-O bond length in single crystal of YBCFO and (b) corresponding DWFs as functions of temperature for θ = 0° and 70°.