Literature DB >> 31818775

A systematic review of the clinician related barriers and facilitators to the use of evidence-informed interventions for post traumatic stress.

Jodie Finch1, Catherine Ford2, Lauren Grainger2, Richard Meiser-Stedman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of evidence-informed interventions for PTSD have been developed and recommended by clinical guidelines. Despite efforts to disseminate these approaches, there remains a gap between evidence and practice, and research has started to identify a number of barriers to the implementation of evidence-informed interventions.
METHODS: This systematic review aimed to synthesise the relevant literature, both quantitative and qualitative, relating to clinicians' perceived barriers and facilitators. Literature searches were conducted to identify relevant studies. Data were analysed using content analysis to categorise key barriers and facilitators.
RESULTS: A literature search identified 34 relevant studies. Four levels of barriers and facilitators were identified, covering intervention, client, clinician and system factors. The most commonly cited barriers identified include inflexibility of manualised approaches, fear of increasing client distress, working with comorbidities and a lack of training and support. Quality appraisal rated the majority of studies as strong, with five studies receiving an adequate rating. LIMITATIONS: The review was limited to studies published in the English language, therefore introducing a risk of bias as perceived barriers and facilitators may be culturally influenced. Additionally the heterogeneity of studies may impact upon comparability, only allowing for a broad analysis and not exploring barriers and facilitators in more detail.
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of training, confidence and knowledge relating to the implementation of evidence-informed interventions for PTSD were commonly reported. A better-informed understanding into the challenges and facilitators experienced by clinicians can help inform implementation needs and should be considered in the development and implementation of training initiatives.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers; Clinicians; Evidence-based practice; Facilitators; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31818775     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  5 in total

1.  Ten misconceptions about trauma-focused CBT for PTSD.

Authors:  Hannah Murray; Nick Grey; Emma Warnock-Parkes; Alice Kerr; Jennifer Wild; David M Clark; Anke Ehlers
Journal:  Cogn Behav Therap       Date:  2022-07-22

2.  Acceptability of tDCS in treating stress-related mental health disorders: a mixed methods study among military patients and caregivers.

Authors:  Fenne M Smits; Guido J de Kort; Elbert Geuze
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of dropout from evidence-based psychological treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and young people.

Authors:  Caroline Simmons; Richard Meiser-Stedman; Hannah Baily; Peter Beazley
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2021-08-05

4.  Internet- and mobile-based trauma-focused intervention for adolescents and young adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: a study protocol of a proof-of-concept feasibility study.

Authors:  Christina Schulte; Anna-Carlotta Zarski; Cedric Sachser; Rita Rosner; David Daniel Ebert
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2022-07-28

5.  Barriers to delivering trauma-focused interventions for people with psychosis and post-traumatic stress disorder: A qualitative study of health care professionals' views.

Authors:  Eleanor Chadwick; Jo Billings
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.966

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.