| Literature DB >> 31817892 |
Zichuan Yi1, Wenyong Feng2,3, Li Wang3, Liming Liu1, Yue Lin1,2, Wenyao He2, Lingling Shui1,2, Chongfu Zhang1, Zhi Zhang1, Guofu Zhou2,3.
Abstract
Electrowetting display (EWD) performance is severely affected by ink distribution and charge trapping in pixel cells. Therefore, a multi structural driving waveform is proposed for improving the aperture ratio of EWDs. In this paper, the hysteresis characteristic (capacitance-voltage, C-V) curve of the EWD pixel is tested and analyzed for obtaining the driving voltage value at the inflection point of the driving waveform. In the composition of driving waveform, a voltage slope is designed for preventing ink dispersion and a reverse pulse is designed for releasing the trapped charge which is caused by hysteresis characteristic. Finally, the frequency and the duty cycle of the driving waveform are optimized for the max aperture ratio by a series of testing. The experimental results show that the proposed driving waveform can improve the ink dispersion behavior, and the aperture ratio of the EWD is about 8% higher than the conventional driving waveform. At the same time, the response speed of the driving waveform can satisfy the dynamic display in EWDs, which provides a new idea for the design of the EWD driving scheme.Entities:
Keywords: aperture ratio; driving waveform; electrowetting display; hysteresis characteristic; ink distribution; response speed
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817892 PMCID: PMC6952776 DOI: 10.3390/mi10120862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1The electrowetting display (EWD) pixel structure and its equivalent circuit. (a) The EWD pixel structure without applied voltage; (b) simplified equivalent circuit diagram of an EWD pixel unit.
Figure 2Ink film distribution state when the pixel is driven by the driving waveform. (a) Ink shrinks to one corner; (b) ink shrinks to four corners.
Figure 3Ink splitting diagram.
Figure 4The ink distribution state and the corresponding aperture ratio with the action of the driving waveform. (a) The ink is all shrunk to one corner and its aperture ratio value is 73.9%. (b) The ink is dispersed into two parts and its aperture ratio value is 62.1%. (c) The ink is dispersed into three parts and its aperture ratio value is 61.6%. (d) The ink is dispersed into four parts and its aperture ratio value is 60.7%.
Figure 5Optical testing system for EWDs. (a) AFG3052 arbitrary function generator; (b) ATA2022H high voltage amplifier; (c) testing board; (d) microscope; (e) pixels in an EWD; (f) computer.
Figure 6The relationship between the capacitance and the driving voltage in an EWD.
Figure 7The structure of driving waveforms. (a) The driving waveform with a rising slope. (b) The proposed driving waveform in this paper.
Figure 8The relationship between the frequency and pixel aperture ratio. (a) Conventional driving waveform. (b) The proposed driving waveform in this paper.
Figure 9The relationship between aperture ratio (ink distribution) and the frequency of the driving waveform.
Figure 10The relationship between the aperture ratio and the duty cycle in the driving waveform.
Figure 11Change process of the EWD aperture ratio under driving waveforms. (a) Conventional driving waveform. (b) Driving waveform with a slow slope. (c) The proposed driving waveform in this paper. (d) Comparison of aperture ratio and response time among three driving waveforms.
Comparison of parameter values among different driving waveforms.
| Driving Waveform | Conventional Driving Waveform [ | The Driving Waveform with a Slope [ | Proposed Driving Waveform |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aperture ratio | 65.7% | 73.6% | 73.9% |
| Response time | 8 ms | 65 ms | 15 ms |
| Shape of ink |
|
|
|