| Literature DB >> 31817535 |
Hyun-Kyung Kim1,2, Kyung A Ham1,2,3, Seung-Woo Lee1,2, Hong Seok Choi1,2,3, Hong-Sug Kim4, Hong Kyung Kim5,6, Hae-Sol Shin5,6, Kyoung Yul Seo5,6, Yejin Cho7, Ki Taek Nam7, In-Beom Kim8, Young Ae Joe1,2,3.
Abstract
Peroxidasin (PXDN) is a unique peroxidase containing extracellular matrix motifs and stabilizes collagen IV networks by forming sulfilimine crosslinks. PXDN gene knockout in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) and Drosophila results in the demise at the embryonic and larval stages. PXDN mutations lead to severe eye disorders, including microphthalmia, cataract, glaucoma, and anterior segment dysgenesis in humans and mice. To investigate how PXDN loss of function affects organ development, we generated Pxdn knockout mice by deletion of exon 1 and its 5' upstream sequences of the Pxdn gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Loss of both PXDN expression and collagen IV sulfilimine cross-links was detected only in the homozygous mice, which showed completely or almost closed eyelids with small eyes, having no apparent external morphological defects in other organs. In histological analysis of eye tissues, the homozygous mice had extreme defects in eye development, including no eyeballs or drastically disorganized eye structures, whereas the heterozygous mice showed normal eye structure. Visual function tests also revealed no obvious functional abnormalities in the eyes between heterozygous mice and wild-type mice. Thus, these results suggest that PXDN activity is essential in eye development, and also indicate that a single allele of Pxdn gene is sufficient for eye-structure formation and normal visual function.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; anophthalmia; eye development; knockout mice; microphthalmia; peroxidasin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817535 PMCID: PMC6941041 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20246144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Construction of mice with deletion of the exon1 and its 5′ upstream sequences of the peroxidasin (Pxdn) gene. (A) Genomic locus of mouse Pxdn gene on chromosome 12 and cutting sites of sgRNAs. A total of 760 bps encompassing exon1 and its 5′ upstream sequences of the Pxdn gene were deleted by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. (B) Genotyping of F0 mice (#1–#54). PCR was performed using genomic DNA isolated from tail-cut samples and a primer pair, SF3 and SR3. The #52 mouse (asterisk) among deletion mutants had 760 bps deletion containing exon1 and its 5′ upstream sequences of the Pxdn gene. (C) The genomic DNA isolated from the lung tissues of the progeny mice was used for PCR analysis using primer pairs SF1 and SR2. (D) A schematic depiction of PXDN with leucin-repeat-rich (LRR), immunoglobulin (Ig), peroxidase, and von-Willebrand factor type C (vWFC) domains (upper panel). Inactivation of the Pxdn gene was verified by RT-PCR analyses (lower panel). Total RNAs were isolated from the lung tissue of the mice and used for RT-PCR analysis using specific primers that bind to different regions of the Pxdn gene: 5′ UTR-exon 19, exons 10–14 (IgC2 3–4 domain), exons 17–19 (peroxidase domain), and 3′ UTR region. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (E) Immunoblot analysis of PXDN expression was done using the lung tissue of the mice and anti-mouse PXDN polyclonal antibody. (F) Immunoblot analysis of non-collageneous 1 (NC1) crosslinked dimer/un-crosslinked monomer levels of collagen IV (Col IV) using the lung tissue of the mice. The tissue lysate was treated with collagenase prior to immunoblot analysis.
Figure 2Deletion of the exon1 and its 5′ upstream sequences of the Pxdn gene caused congenital malformation of eyes in mice. (A) Representative photograph of Pxdn(+/+) (WT), Pxdn(−/−) (KO), and Pxdn(+/−) (heterozygous) mice at 9 weeks of age (left). Body weight of the WT (n = 3), KO (n = 7), or heterozygous (n = 10) mice. (B) Comparison of the organs removed from the mice, which were approximately 20 weeks old. (C) Representative external morphology of the eyes in the WT, heterozygous, and KO mice. Compared with the WT (n = 34) or heterozygous mice (n = 115), completely or almost closed eyelids were noted in the KO mice (n = 40).
Figure 3Histological analysis of Pxdn KO mice. (A) Representative histological data of the eye tissues of the WT, heterozygous, or KO mice (13–15 weeks old). Paraffin-embedded eye sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E). The eye tissues of heterozygous mice (n = 10, male = 5, female = 5) displayed normal anterior segments similar to that of the WT mice (n = 6, male = 3, female = 3), whereas the eye tissue of the KO mice (n = 6, male = 4, female = 2) exhibited extremely disorganized eye structures or no eyeball structure. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) Western blot analysis of PXDN expression was done using the eye tissue of the mice. β-actin was used as a loading control. (C) RT-PCR analyses of PXDN and Col IV α1 and α2 expression in the eye tissues of the WT, KO, and heterozygous mice. A total of 28 cycles for PXDN and Col IV α1 and 33 cycles for Col IV α2 were carried out for the RT-PCR analysis. GAPDH was used as a control.
Figure 4Visual test of the WT and heterozygous mice. (A) Visual acuity was measured by optokinetic nystagmus. (B) Mouse intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using tonometry equipment. NS, not significant. (C) Fundus photography was used to compare any changes in retina, optic nerve, or retinal vessels pattern between the WT and heterozygous mice. Both groups showed a normal retinal phenotype with the radial pattern of arterioles and venules. (D) Representative optical coherence tomography (OCT) cross-section images including cornea, lens, and retina by horizontal meridian of the WT and heterozygous mice. (E) The retinal layer and boundary identifications: inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), and outer nuclear layer (ONL). (F) Evaluation of visual function in the mice following electroretinography (ERG) recording. ERG recordings of photopic ERGs and scotopic ERGs from the WT and heterozygous mice were performed. Dark-adapted and light-adapted ERGs were elicited by eight or six different stimulus intensities in rod and cone cells, respectively. ERG a-waves are shown in amplitude of dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions (left). ERG b-waves are shown in amplitude of dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions (right). (G) The response time of light sensitivity of retina (n = 6/WT and n = 10/heterozygote).