| Literature DB >> 31817524 |
Rita Kleizienė1, Miglė Panasenkienė1, Audrius Vaitkus1.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to define the effect of oxidative aging on the chemical and rheological properties of neat and styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) polymer-modified bitumen. The experimental research had two objectives: firstly, the short and long-term effects of aging on the properties of neat and polymer-modified bitumen were investigated. Then, the aging indexes based on chemical and rheological properties to describe the age of unknown bitumen were established. Aging characteristics such as the Gaestel index, sulfoxide and carbonyl indexes, linear viscoelastic strain range, crossover temperature, and Glover-Rowe parameter were analysed for laboratory aged and naturally aged neat and polymer-modified bitumen. The functional composition of aged bitumen was evaluated by measuring absorption with Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) attenuated total reflection (ATR) spectrometer. The saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA) fractions were determined with thin layer chromatography with flame-ionization detection (TLC-FID) to determine the colloidal instability index (Gaestel index). Finally, the complex shear modulus was determined with dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) to evaluate the influence of aging on the bitumen mechanical performance.Entities:
Keywords: aging index; asphalt binder; bitumen; colloidal stability; oxidative aging; rheology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817524 PMCID: PMC6947620 DOI: 10.3390/ma12244066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Summary of materials and results of penetration (Pen) and softening point (TR&B).
| Code | Bitumen Penetration Grade | Aging and Sample Preparation Method | Pen at 25 °C, mm−1 | TR&B, °C | Penetration Index (PI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-RT | 70/100 | RTFOT | 52.4 | 50.5 | −0.99 |
| 1-P1 | 70/100 | PAV I (22 h) | 33.3 | 57.1 | −0.48 |
| 1-P2 | 70/100 | PAV II (44 h) | 26.1 | 61.1 | −0.21 |
| 4-RT | PMB 45/80-55 | RTFOT | 41.1 | 66.3 | 1.70 |
| 4-P1 | PMB 45/80-55 | PAV I (22 h) | 28.6 | 70.0 | 1.50 |
| 4-P2 | PMB 45/80-55 | PAV II (44 h) | 23.1 | 69.5 | 0.99 |
| 7-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 54.0 | 51.8 | −0.58 |
| 8-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 43.2 | 54.1 | −0.58 |
| 9-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 47.0 | 61.1 | 1.09 |
| 10-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 58.7 | 51.9 | −0.36 |
| 11-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 37.4 | 62.0 | 0.71 |
Summary of SARA results. SARA: saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes.
| Code | Bitumen Grade | Aging and Sample Preparation Method | SARA Fractional Groups, % | Gaestel Index Ic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saturates | Aromatics | Resins | Asphaltenes | ||||
| 1-RT | 70/100 | RTFOT | 5.28 | 43.66 | 36.30 | 14.76 | 0.251 |
| 1-P1 | 70/100 | PAV I (22 h) | 5.21 | 27.86 | 51.95 | 14.97 | 0.253 |
| 1-P2 | 70/100 | PAV II (44 h) | 4.94 | 23.87 | 53.54 | 17.66 | 0.292 |
| 4-RT | PMB 45/80-55 | RTFOT | 5.18 | 34.32 | 41.76 | 18.73 | 0.314 |
| 4-P1 | PMB 45/80-55 | PAV I (22 h) | 5.12 | 30.94 | 48.54 | 15.40 | 0.258 |
| 4-P2 | PMB 45/80-55 | PAV II (44 h) | 5.03 | 24.82 | 55.55 | 14.60 | 0.244 |
| 7-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 7.68 | 30.56 | 41.70 | 20.05 | 0.384 |
| 8-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 6.01 | 31.52 | 44.72 | 17.75 | 0.312 |
| 9-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 6.50 | 31.67 | 43.14 | 18.68 | 0.337 |
| 10-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 6.79 | 33.23 | 42.09 | 17.88 | 0.328 |
| 11-RC | Unknown | Recovered | 6.70 | 29.55 | 44.58 | 19.18 | 0.349 |
Figure 1Comparison of SARA fractional groups, penetration index (PI) and instability index (Ic) due to aging influence.
Summary of bitumen functional groups results.
| Code | Bitumen Grade | Aromatic Structures | Aliphatic Structures | Oxidative Aging Structures | Polymer Structures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAR,% | IAL,% | B,% | L,% | ICO,% | ISO,% | IPB,% | IPS,% | ||
| 1-RT | 70/100 | 0.88 | 11.26 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.080 | 0.292 | 0.012 | −0.011 |
| 1-P1 | 70/100 | 1.09 | 8.78 | 0.25 | 0.80 | 0.221 | 0.704 | 0.009 | −0.006 |
| 1-P2 | 70/100 | 1.16 | 8.73 | 0.47 | 0.94 | 0.418 | 0.831 | 0.007 | −0.004 |
| 4-RT | PMB 45/80-55 | 0.98 | 9.64 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.037 | 0.293 | 0.186 | 0.129 |
| 4-P1 | PMB 45/80-55 | 1.05 | 9.18 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 0.251 | 0.747 | 0.179 | 0.135 |
| 4-P2 | PMB 45/80-55 | 1.13 | 8.91 | 0.37 | 0.85 | 0.329 | 0.749 | 0.177 | 0.134 |
| 7-RC | Unknown | 1.03 | 9.97 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.232 | 0.732 | −0.007 | −0.002 |
| 8-RC | Unknown | 1.08 | 9.60 | 0.28 | 0.70 | 0.248 | 0.614 | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| 9-RC | Unknown | 0.32 | 18.74 | 0.37 | 0.67 | 0.295 | 0.523 | 0.148 | 0.083 |
| 10-RC | Unknown | 1.03 | 9.88 | 0.33 | 0.77 | 0.286 | 0.674 | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| 11-RC | Unknown | 0.67 | 15.60 | 0.37 | 0.76 | 0.299 | 0.622 | 0.146 | 0.087 |
Figure 2Functional groups representation: (a) Relation of carbonyl and sulfoxide indexes; (b) The validation of polymer indexes of neat and polymer-modified bitumen under short, long, and double long-term laboratory and natural aging.
Figure 3The strain limits of the linear viscoelastic range.
Figure 4Correlation of measured crossover temperatures by temperature frequency sweep test and calculated from the master curve.
Figure 5Glover–Rowe (G-R) parameter Black Space plot with damage zone (red line damage zone G-R = 450 kPa; red dotted line warning zone G-R = 180 kPa).