| Literature DB >> 31816983 |
Xiangrong Zhu1,2,3, Jing Jiang3, Chunxiao Yin3, Gaoyang Li1,3, Yueming Jiang2, Yang Shan1,3.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the flavonoid accumulation between ozone-treated and untreated Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.) fruits. The fruits exposed to gaseous ozone were found to have higher antioxidant activities and content of flavonoid during the storage period by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). To reveal the molecular regulation of flavonoid accumulation by ozone, chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), β-1,3-glucanase (GLU), chitinase (CHT), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and peroxidase (POD) were identified and their expression was examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR). These results support the promising application of ozone treatment as a safe food preservation technique for controlling postharvest disease and extending shelf-life of harvested Satsuma mandarin.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant capacity; flavonoids accumulation; gene expression; ozonation; satsuma mandarin
Year: 2019 PMID: 31816983 PMCID: PMC6995626 DOI: 10.3390/biom9120821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
The respiration rate, hue angle value (Hue0) and decay rate of mandarin citrus fruit. Each value is presented as a mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Values in the rows denoted with different superscript letters (a–f) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
| CK-1 d | O3-1 d | CK-4 d | O3-4 d | CK-30 d | O3-30 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory rate (mg × kg−1 × s−1) | 16.2 a ± 1.5 | 12.2 b ± 0.8 | 10.2 c ± 1.10 | 8.4 d ± 0.7 | 15.7 a ± 4.89 | 8.2 d ± 3.9 |
| Hue0 | 98.3 a ± 3.3 | 104.7 b ± 4.0 | 87.2 c ± 2.9 | 100.7 d ± 5.4 | 76.0 e ± 2.7 | 79.2 f ± 3.9 |
Figure 1Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) chromatograms of eleven flavonoid mixed standards and citrus mandarin peel samples at 280 nm and 330 nm. (a) The mixed standard of naringin, narirutin, hesperidin, neohesperidin, taxifolin, didymin at 280 nm; (b) The mixed standard of rutin, diosmetin, sinensetin, nobiletin, and tangeretin at 330 nm; (c) Sample of narirutin, hesperidin, taxifolin, didymin at 280 nm; (d) Sample of rutin, diosmetin, sinensetin, nobiletin, and tangeretin at 330 nm.
The flavonoid content (mg × kg−1 dry weight) in the peel of mandarin citrus. Each value is presented as a mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Values in the rows denoted with different superscript letters (a–f) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
| CK-1d | O3-1d | CK-4d | O3-4d | CK-30d | O3-30d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naringin | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Narirutin | 7661.8 a ± 79.5 | 6599.2 bc ± 102.9 | 6527.7 b ± 32.6 | 8306.2 d ± 102.4 | 6689.1 c ± 34.2 | 8686.6 e ± 92.3 |
| Hesperidin | 13,136.6 a ± 144.0 | 14,851.7 b ± 275.2 | 15,644.2 c ± 263.8 | 16,095.1 d ± 81.1 | 15,623.4 c ± 59.5 | 16,522.2 e ± 159.8 |
| Neohesperidin | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Taxifolin | 119.7 a ± 0.8 | 136.6 b ± 0.3 | 135.2 b ± 2.2 | 149.9 c ± 4.7 | 145.6 c ± 5.2 | 136.5 b ± 2.3 |
| Didymin | 1355.8 a ± 0.6 | 1311.4 a ± 4.3 | 1255.7 b ± 1.7 | 1635.3 c ± 2.3 | 1584.9 d ± 86.6 | 1521.5 e ± 13.5 |
| Rutin | 1765.8 a ± 39.5 | 2583.8 bd ± 83.8 | 2473.5 c ± 86.8 | 2619.6 d ± 46.5 | 2499.4 bc ± 24.8 | 3068.7 e ± 15.3 |
| Diosmetin | 67.5 a ± 1.8 | 86.8 b ± 2.3 | 81.1 c ± 0.1 | 101.0 d ± 0.1 | 100.0 d ± 3.1 | 71.5 e ± 1.0 |
| Sinensetin | 464.6 ab ± 20.6 | 469.8 abc ± 9.1 | 446.7 a ± 15.3 | 494.8 c ±11.8 | 478.6 bc ± 20.1 | 398.4 d ± 2.9 |
| Nobiletin | 626.9 a ± 8.0 | 645.6 ac ± 2.2 | 628.6 ac ± 6.3 | 728.2 b ± 9.8 | 759.9 b ± 13.9 | 653.8 c ± 1.5 |
| Tangeretin | 311.4 a ± 7.2 | 294.9 b ± 2.9 | 292.2 b ± 1.0 | 309.6 a ± 2.1 | 313.8 a ± 4.3 | 307.1 a ± 3.4 |
| Total | 25,510.1 a ± 302.0 | 26,979.8 b ± 483.0 | 27,484.9 c ± 409.8 | 30,439.7 d ± 260.8 | 28,194.7 e ± 251.7 | 31,366.3 f ± 292.0 |
The Results of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphoic acid (ABTS) free radical scavenging activity (mmol Trolox TE × kg−1 dry weight) in the peel of mandarin citrus. Each value is presented as a mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Values in the rows denoted with different superscript letters (a–d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
| CK-1d | O3-1d | CK-4d | O3-4d | CK-30d | O3-30d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | 44.0 a ± 0.2 | 47.6 b ± 0.2 | 47.4 b ± 0.1 | 51.4 c ± 0.3 | 50.9 c ± 0.8 | 52.7 d ± 0.2 |
| ABTS | 113.3 a ± 1.3 | 118.0 b ± 0.4 | 119.0 b ± 0.4 | 121.9 c ± 0.4 | 124.1 d ± 1.8 | 125.4 d ± 0.1 |
Figure 2Expression patterns of six genes determined by q-PCR in the skin of citrus mandarin peel. Each data point represents a mean ± standard error (n = 3).