Literature DB >> 31816249

The spectrum of response to erenumab in patients with chronic migraine and subgroup analysis of patients achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% response.

Jan Lewis Brandes1, Hans-Christoph Diener2, David Dolezil3, Marshall C Freeman4, Peter J McAllister5, Paul Winner6, Jan Klatt7, Sunfa Cheng8, Feng Zhang8, Shihua Wen9, Shannon Ritter9, Robert A Lenz8, Daniel D Mikol8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of erenumab across the spectrum of response thresholds (≥50%, ≥75%, 100%) based on monthly migraine days (MMD) reduction in patients with chronic migraine from a 12-week, randomized study (NCT02066415).
METHODS: Patients (n = 667) received (3:2:2) placebo or erenumab 70/140 mg once-monthly. The proportion of patients achieving a given response threshold was assessed. A post-hoc analysis was conducted to contextualize the actual treatment benefit in subgroups of patients achieving (or not) specified response thresholds. Outcome measures included MMD, acute migraine-specific medication treatment days (MSMD) and disability.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients responding to erenumab exceeded that of placebo at the ≥50% and ≥75% response thresholds. At month 3, 39.9% and 41.2% of patients on erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively, achieved ≥50% response versus placebo (23.5%). Similarly, at month 3, 17.0% and 20.9% of patients on erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively, achieved ≥75% response versus placebo (7.8%). Compared with the overall erenumab-treated population (change in MMD: -6.6 [both 70 and 140 mg]), ≥50% responders showed MMD reductions of -12.2/-12.5 for 70 mg/140 mg versus -2.6/-2.2 for those not achieving ≥50% response. ≥75% responders showed MMD reductions of -13.9/-14.8 for 70 mg/140 mg versus -5.0/-4.3 for those not achieving ≥75% response. Relative improvements in MSMD and disability were observed in responders versus overall erenumab-treated population.
CONCLUSION: For erenumab-treated patients achieving ≥50% response, the actual reduction in MMD was almost twice that of the overall population. These findings provide context for setting realistic expectations regarding actual treatment benefit experienced by patients responding to treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erenumab; chronic migraine; monthly migraine days; responder rates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31816249     DOI: 10.1177/0333102419894559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  8 in total

1.  Erenumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine complicated with medication overuse headache: an observational, retrospective, 12-month real-life study.

Authors:  Maria Michela Cainazzo; Carlo Baraldi; Anna Ferrari; Flavia Lo Castro; Luca Pani; Simona Guerzoni
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine in patients treated with erenumab: real-life data from an Italian region.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Alfonsina Casalena; Ilaria Frattale; Valeria Caponnetto; Amleto Gabriele; Giannapia Affaitati; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Maurizio Assetta; Maurizio Maddestra; Fabio Marzoli; Stefano Viola; Davide Cerone; Carmine Marini; Francesca Pistoia; Simona Sacco
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 7.277

3.  Rates of Response to Atogepant for Migraine Prophylaxis Among Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Patricia Pozo-Rosich; Andrew M Blumenfeld; David W Dodick; Peter McAllister; Ye Li; Kaifeng Lu; Brett Dabruzzo; Rosa Miceli; Lawrence Severt; Michelle Finnegan; Joel M Trugman
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Monoclonal Antibodies Acting on the CGRP as a Combined Treatment for Migraine (TACTIC): Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Chiara Rosignoli; Valeria Caponnetto; Francesca Pistoia; Michele Ferrara; Aurora D'Atri; Simona Sacco
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Two-year efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures: results from the LIBERTY study.

Authors:  Michel Dominique Ferrari; Uwe Reuter; Peter J Goadsby; Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima; Subhayan Mondal; Shihua Wen; Nadia Tenenbaum; Shaloo Pandhi; Michel Lanteri-Minet; Tracy Stites
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Migraine Prevention with Erenumab: Focus on Patient Selection, Perspectives and Outcomes.

Authors:  Eleonora De Matteis; Simona Sacco; Raffaele Ornello
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Comparing the relative and absolute effect of erenumab: is a 50% response enough? Results from the ESTEEMen study.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Carlo Baraldi; Simona Guerzoni; Giorgio Lambru; Anna P Andreou; Bianca Raffaelli; Astrid Gendolla; Piero Barbanti; Cinzia Aurilia; Gabriella Egeo; Sabina Cevoli; Valentina Favoni; Fabrizio Vernieri; Claudia Altamura; Antonio Russo; Marcello Silvestro; Elisabetta Dalla Valle; Andrea Mancioli; Angelo Ranieri; Gennaro Alfieri; Nina Latysheva; Elena Filatova; Jamie Talbot; Shuli Cheng; Dagny Holle; Armin Scheffler; Tomáš Nežádal; Dana Čtrnáctá; Jitka Šípková; Zuzana Matoušová; Alfonsina Casalena; Maurizio Maddestra; Stefano Viola; Giannapia Affaitati; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Francesca Pistoia; Uwe Reuter; Simona Sacco
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 7.277

8.  The Spectrum of Response to Erenumab in Patients With Episodic Migraine and Subgroup Analysis of Patients Achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% Response.

Authors:  Gregor Broessner; Uwe Reuter; Jo H Bonner; David W Dodick; Yngve Hallström; Hernan Picard; Feng Zhang; Robert A Lenz; Jan Klatt; Daniel D Mikol
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.887

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.