Literature DB >> 31815283

Wild Bee Visitation Rates Exceed Pollination Thresholds in Commercial Cucurbita Agroecosystems.

C M McGrady1, R Troyer1, S J Fleischer1.   

Abstract

Wild bees supply sufficient pollination in Cucurbita agroecosystems in certain settings; however, some growers continue to stock fields with managed pollinators due to uncertainties of temporal and spatial variation on pollination services supplied by wild bees. Here, we evaluate wild bee pollination activity in wholesale, commercial pumpkin fields over 3 yr. We identified 37 species of bees foraging in commercial pumpkin fields. Honey bees (Apis mellifera L. [Hymenoptera: Apidae]), squash bees (Eucera (Peponapis) Say, Dorchin [Hymenoptera: Apidae]), and bumble bees (Bombus spp., primarily B. impatiens Cresson [Hymenoptera: Apidae]) were the most active pollinator taxa, responsible for over 95% of all pollination visits. Preference for female flowers decreased as distance from field edge increased for several bee taxa. Visitation rates from one key pollinator was negatively affected by field size. Visitation rates for multiple taxa exhibited a curvilinear response as the growing season progressed and responded positively to increasing floral density. We synthesized existing literature to estimate minimum 'pollination thresholds' per taxa and determined that each of the most active pollinator taxa exceeded these thresholds independently. Under current conditions, renting honey bee hives may be superfluous in this system. These results can aid growers when executing pollination management strategies and further highlights the importance of monitoring and conserving wild pollinator populations.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agricultural entomology; crop pollination; pollination; social insects; vegetable entomology

Year:  2020        PMID: 31815283     DOI: 10.1093/jee/toz295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators.

Authors:  J R Reilly; D R Artz; D Biddinger; K Bobiwash; N K Boyle; C Brittain; J Brokaw; J W Campbell; J Daniels; E Elle; J D Ellis; S J Fleischer; J Gibbs; R L Gillespie; K B Gundersen; L Gut; G Hoffman; N Joshi; O Lundin; K Mason; C M McGrady; S S Peterson; T L Pitts-Singer; S Rao; N Rothwell; L Rowe; K L Ward; N M Williams; J K Wilson; R Isaacs; R Winfree
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Population decline in a ground-nesting solitary squash bee (Eucera pruinosa) following exposure to a neonicotinoid insecticide treated crop (Cucurbita pepo).

Authors:  D Susan Willis Chan; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Honey bee hives decrease wild bee abundance, species richness, and fruit count on farms regardless of wildflower strips.

Authors:  G M Angelella; C T McCullough; M E O'Rourke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  The threat of pesticide and disease co-exposure to managed and wild bee larvae.

Authors:  Monika Yordanova; Sophie E F Evison; Richard J Gill; Peter Graystock
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.674

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.