Sheng Lu1, Min Yan1, Chen Li1, Chao Yan1, Zhenggang Zhu1, Wencong Lu2. 1. Department of General Surgery, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Shanghai 200025, China. 2. Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Postoperative complications adversely affected the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. This study intends to investigate the feasibility of using machine-learning model to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy. METHODS: In this study, cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy at Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital in 2017 were randomly assigned to a development or validation cohort in a 9:1 ratio. A support vector classification (SVC) model to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy was developed and further validated. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients with 32 features were collected. The positive and negative outcomes of postoperative complication after gastrectomy appeared in 100 (31.2%) and 221 (68.8%) patients, respectively. The SVC model was constructed to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy. The accuracy of 10-fold cross validation and external verification was 78.17% and 78.12%, respectively. Further, an online web server has been developed to share the SVC model for machine-learning-assisted prediction of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy in the future procedures, which is accessible at the web address: http://47.100.47.97:5005/r_model_prediction. CONCLUSIONS: The SVC model was a useful predictor for measuring the risk of postoperative complications after gastrectomy, which may help stratify patients with different overall status for choice of surgical procedure or other treatments. It can be expected that machine-learning models in cancer informatics research are possibly shareable and accessible via web address all over the world.
OBJECTIVE: Postoperative complications adversely affected the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. This study intends to investigate the feasibility of using machine-learning model to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy. METHODS: In this study, cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy at Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital in 2017 were randomly assigned to a development or validation cohort in a 9:1 ratio. A support vector classification (SVC) model to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy was developed and further validated. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients with 32 features were collected. The positive and negative outcomes of postoperative complication after gastrectomy appeared in 100 (31.2%) and 221 (68.8%) patients, respectively. The SVC model was constructed to predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy. The accuracy of 10-fold cross validation and external verification was 78.17% and 78.12%, respectively. Further, an online web server has been developed to share the SVC model for machine-learning-assisted prediction of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy in the future procedures, which is accessible at the web address: http://47.100.47.97:5005/r_model_prediction. CONCLUSIONS: The SVC model was a useful predictor for measuring the risk of postoperative complications after gastrectomy, which may help stratify patients with different overall status for choice of surgical procedure or other treatments. It can be expected that machine-learning models in cancer informatics research are possibly shareable and accessible via web address all over the world.
Authors: Elena Orsenigo; Valentina Tomajer; Saverio Di Palo; Michele Carlucci; Andrea Vignali; Andrea Tamburini; Carlo Staudacher Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2007-02-23 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: Su Han Seo; Hoon Hur; Chang Wook An; Xian Yi; June Young Kim; Sang-Uk Han; Yong Kwan Cho Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 3.720
Authors: Dmytro Onishchenko; Daniel S Rubin; James R van Horne; R Parker Ward; Ishanu Chattopadhyay Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Simon Williams; Hugo Layard Horsfall; Jonathan P Funnell; John G Hanrahan; Danyal Z Khan; William Muirhead; Danail Stoyanov; Hani J Marcus Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Hasan Ul Banna; Ahmed Zanabli; Brian McMillan; Maria Lehmann; Sumeet Gupta; Michael Gerbo; Joel Palko Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Robert T van Kooten; Renu R Bahadoer; Bouwdewijn Ter Buurkes de Vries; Michel W J M Wouters; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Henk H Hartgrink; Hein Putter; Johan L Dikken Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 2.885