Literature DB >> 31814196

Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Systems: Similarities and Differences.

Hao Wu1,2, Hui Ling Tan1,3, Cui Ying Toe1, Jason Scott1, Lianzhou Wang4, Rose Amal1, Yun Hau Ng1,2.   

Abstract

Photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical processes are two key systems in harvesting sunlight for energy and environmental applications. As both systems are employing photoactive semiconductors as the major active component, strategies have been formulated to improve the properties of the semiconductors for better performances. However, requirements to yield excellent performances are different in these two distinctive systems. Although there are universal strategies applicable to improve the performance of photoactive semiconductors, similarities and differences exist when the semiconductors are to be used differently. Here, considerations on selected typical factors governing the performances in photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical systems, even though the same type of semiconductor is used, are provided. Understanding of the underlying mechanisms in relation to their photoactivities is of fundamental importance for rational design of high-performing photoactive materials, which may serve as a general guideline for the fabrication of good photocatalysts or photoelectrodes toward sustainable solar fuel generation.
© 2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  mechanism similarity; photoactive materials; photocatalysts; photoelectrochemical systems; solar energy conversion; system performance; water splitting

Year:  2019        PMID: 31814196     DOI: 10.1002/adma.201904717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mater        ISSN: 0935-9648            Impact factor:   30.849


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bridging electrocatalyst and cocatalyst studies for solar hydrogen production via water splitting.

Authors:  Masaki Saruyama; Christian Mark Pelicano; Toshiharu Teranishi
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 9.825

2.  Highly efficient and tunable visible-light-catalytic synthesis of 2,5-diformylfuran using HBr and molecular oxygen.

Authors:  Wenwei Hu; Jialuo She; Zaihui Fu; Bo Yang; Huanhuan Zhang; Dabo Jiang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 3.  Recent advances in photodegradation of antibiotic residues in water.

Authors:  Xiuru Yang; Zhi Chen; Wan Zhao; Chunxi Liu; Xiaoxiao Qian; Ming Zhang; Guoying Wei; Eakalak Khan; Yun Hau Ng; Yong Sik Ok
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 13.273

4.  Magnetic field effect on the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange by commercial TiO2 powder.

Authors:  Yuecheng Bian; Ganhong Zheng; Wei Ding; Lin Hu; Zhigao Sheng
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  New black indium oxide-tandem photothermal CO2-H2 methanol selective catalyst.

Authors:  Zeshu Zhang; Chengliang Mao; Débora Motta Meira; Paul N Duchesne; Athanasios A Tountas; Zhao Li; Chenyue Qiu; Sanli Tang; Rui Song; Xue Ding; Junchuan Sun; Jiangfan Yu; Jane Y Howe; Wenguang Tu; Lu Wang; Geoffrey A Ozin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Synthesis, Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of CaTiO3-Based Ceramics Doped with Lanthanum.

Authors:  Maxim V Zdorovets; Daryn B Borgekov; Inesh Z Zhumatayeva; Inesh E Kenzhina; Artem L Kozlovskiy
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.719

7.  Visible Light Photoelectrochemical Sensor for Dopamine: Determination Using Iron Vanadate Modified Electrode.

Authors:  Luan Pereira Camargo; Marcelo Rodrigues da Silva Pelissari; Paulo Rogério Catarini da Silva; Augusto Batagin-Neto; Roberta Antigo Medeiros; Marcos Antônio Dias; Luiz Henrique Dall'Antonia
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.927

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.