Literature DB >> 31813990

Premovement Suppression of Corticospinal Excitability may be a Necessary Part of Movement Preparation.

J Ibáñez1,2, R Hannah1,3, L Rocchi1, J C Rothwell1.   

Abstract

In reaction time (RT) tasks corticospinal excitability (CSE) rises just prior to movement. This is preceded by a paradoxical reduction in CSE, when the time of the imperative ("GO") stimulus is relatively predictable. Because RT tasks emphasise speed of response, it is impossible to distinguish whether reduced CSE reflects a mechanism for withholding prepared actions, or whether it is an inherent part of movement preparation. To address this question, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to estimate CSE changes preceding 1) RT movements; 2) movements synchronized with a predictable signal (predictive timing or PT movements); and 3) self-paced movements. Results show that CSE decreases with a similar temporal profile in all three cases, suggesting that it reflects a previously unrecognised state in the transition between rest and movement. Although TMS revealed reduced CSE in all movements, the TMS pulse itself had different effects on movement times. TMS given ~200 ms before the times to move speeded the onset of RT and self-paced movements, suggesting that their initiation depends on a form of trigger that can be conditioned by external events. On the contrary, PT movements did not show this effect, suggesting the use of a different triggering strategy prioritizing internal events.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

Keywords:  corticospinal excitability; self-paced movements; transcranial magnetic stimulation; voluntary movements

Year:  2020        PMID: 31813990     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  9 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.

Authors:  Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Action Selection and Motor Decision Making: Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margherita Tecilla; Andrea Guerra; Lorenzo Rocchi; Sara Määttä; Matteo Bologna; Maria Herrojo Ruiz; Roberta Biundo; Angelo Antonini; Florinda Ferreri
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Stimulation of Different Sectors of the Human Dorsal Premotor Cortex Induces a Shift from Reactive to Predictive Action Strategies and Changes in Motor Inhibition: A Dense Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Mapping Study.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Sara Parmigiani
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-24

4.  A TMS study of preparatory suppression in binge drinkers.

Authors:  Julien Grandjean; Julie Duque
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Influence of post-stroke fatigue on reaction times and corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.

Authors:  William De Doncker; Katlyn E Brown; Annapoorna Kuppuswamy
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Contribution of TMS and TMS-EEG to the Understanding of Mechanisms Underlying Physiological Brain Aging.

Authors:  Andrea Guerra; Lorenzo Rocchi; Alberto Grego; Francesca Berardi; Concetta Luisi; Florinda Ferreri
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-22

7.  Proactive inhibition is marked by differences in the pattern of motor cortex activity during movement preparation and execution.

Authors:  Vishal Rawji; Sachin Modi; Lorenzo Rocchi; Marjan Jahanshahi; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling in repetitive movements in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Ruxue Gong; Christoph Mühlberg; Mirko Wegscheider; Christopher Fricke; Jost-Julian Rumpf; Thomas R Knösche; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.974

9.  SICI during changing brain states: Differences in methodology can lead to different conclusions.

Authors:  Jaime Ibáñez; Danny A Spampinato; Varshini Paraneetharan; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 8.955

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.