Yan-Jie Li1, Xin Pan2, Cheng Wang1, Ben He3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: panxin805@163.com. 3. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: drheben@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Catheter interventional treatment of pulmonary vein stenosis or occlusion (PVS/O) following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenging field due to lacking randomized data and there are limited data about stenting. METHODS: All patients at our center who underwent pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) stenting for PVS/O induced by RFA were retrospectively assessed. Clinical presentation, anatomic site of stenosis and hemodynamic information, as well as follow-up data, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2010 to June 2018, 56 patients with PVS/O secondary to RFA were treated with 113 stents. Procedural success rate was 95.8%. Pressure gradients significantly reduced (p < 0.001) and vessel caliber markedly increased (p < 0.001) in all the stenotic sites, with immediate symptoms significantly improved. The overall in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate was 21.8% after a median follow-up period of 26 months (interquartile range: 16 to 35.5 months). The incidence of ISR was higher in patients treated with stent diameter ≤ 8 mm than those with stent diameter >8 mm (HR: 3.91; 95% CI 1.74-8.81; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PVS stenting is a safe and effective procedure for PVS/O secondary to RFA. Long-term patency and good clinical outcomes are gained after bigger-diameter stent implantation.
BACKGROUND: Catheter interventional treatment of pulmonary vein stenosis or occlusion (PVS/O) following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenging field due to lacking randomized data and there are limited data about stenting. METHODS: All patients at our center who underwent pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) stenting for PVS/O induced by RFA were retrospectively assessed. Clinical presentation, anatomic site of stenosis and hemodynamic information, as well as follow-up data, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2010 to June 2018, 56 patients with PVS/O secondary to RFA were treated with 113 stents. Procedural success rate was 95.8%. Pressure gradients significantly reduced (p < 0.001) and vessel caliber markedly increased (p < 0.001) in all the stenotic sites, with immediate symptoms significantly improved. The overall in-stent restenosis (ISR) rate was 21.8% after a median follow-up period of 26 months (interquartile range: 16 to 35.5 months). The incidence of ISR was higher in patients treated with stent diameter ≤ 8 mm than those with stent diameter >8 mm (HR: 3.91; 95% CI 1.74-8.81; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:PVS stenting is a safe and effective procedure for PVS/O secondary to RFA. Long-term patency and good clinical outcomes are gained after bigger-diameter stent implantation.