OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore whether initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment affects the stemness of glioma stem cells using an in vivo basal ganglia glioma model. METHODS: A basal ganglia glioma rat model was established. Rats were exposed to normal oxygen or hyperbaric oxygen on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. After 16 days of glioma cell inoculation, western blot, ELISA, and flow cytometry were performed to examine stemness-associated properties by examining the expression of CD133, A2B5, Nanog, oncostatin M, β-catenin, Oct-3/4, Sox2, and Nestin. RESULTS: Initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment began to affect glioma stemness-associated properties. The proportion of CD133+A2B5+ cells was significantly reduced after initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Additionally, the expression of stemness-related genes such as Nanog and oncostatin M was reduced, while TGF-β and β-catenin were increased. CONCLUSIONS: Initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment not only alters the hypoxic microenvironment but also affects the stemness-associated properties of cancer stem cells.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore whether initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment affects the stemness of glioma stem cells using an in vivo basal ganglia glioma model. METHODS: A basal ganglia gliomarat model was established. Rats were exposed to normal oxygen or hyperbaric oxygen on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. After 16 days of glioma cell inoculation, western blot, ELISA, and flow cytometry were performed to examine stemness-associated properties by examining the expression of CD133, A2B5, Nanog, oncostatin M, β-catenin, Oct-3/4, Sox2, and Nestin. RESULTS: Initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment began to affect glioma stemness-associated properties. The proportion of CD133+A2B5+ cells was significantly reduced after initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Additionally, the expression of stemness-related genes such as Nanog and oncostatin M was reduced, while TGF-β and β-catenin were increased. CONCLUSIONS: Initial hyperbaric oxygen treatment not only alters the hypoxic microenvironment but also affects the stemness-associated properties of cancer stem cells.
Gliomas account for 30% of all brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors,
representing 80% of all malignant brain tumors.[1] In China, malignant glioma is the most common malignant brain tumor with a
median survival time of only 12 to 14 months.[2] Currently, the standard treatment for malignant gliomas is surgical
resection, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy such as the
second-generation alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ). Retrospective analyses have
shown that multimodality therapy with repeated surgical resection, radiotherapy and
chemotherapy have better therapeutic efficacy than chemotherapy alone.[3] Despite multimodality therapy having better effects, the prognosis of these
gliomapatients remains poor owing to high recurrence rates. The poor outcomes for
these gliomapatients are mainly due to recurrence and resistance to radiotherapy
and chemotherapy.[2] In addition to the limitation of drug delivery across the blood–brain
barrier, the poor diagnosis suggests the existence of multiple resistance
mechanisms, such as resistance to DNA damage or apoptotic agents and the effect of a
hypoxic microenvironment.Tumor hypoxia is one characteristic of locally advanced malignant solid tumors
including glioma. During tumor progression, tumor hypoxia is caused by an imbalance
between the supply and consumption of oxygen. The oxygen-sensitive α-subunit of
hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1α) regulates the sensitivity and resistance of
glioma cells in different oxygen concentrations.[4] Glioma cells were identified as tumor propagators and classified as
malignant, which suggests the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) with highly
aggressive, self-renewal ability properties that can be phenotyped by cell markers.
The cytoskeletal protein (Nestin) and pluripotency transcription factors (Sox2,
Nanog, and Oct3/4) serve as neural stem biomarkers to identify glioma stem cells.[5] Meanwhile, oncostatin M (OSM) is a cytokine that belongs to the interleukin-6
(IL-6) family and functions in cell migration and invasion.[6] Treating cancer cells with OSM leads to increased stemness of CSCs (increased
SOX2 expression) and promotes progression (phenotypic changes).[6] CD133 (also known as prominin-1) is a cancer stem cell marker that
illustrated the initiation function of brain cancer and is associated with the
behaviors of cancer stem cells.[7] A2B5+ is characterized as a glial progenitor marker and has been
demonstrated to play an important role in the initiation and maintenance of cancer
stem cells.[8] Combining these CSCs markers, displays the level of stemness with regard to
cell proliferation and regeneration.[9] According to the epigenetic plasticity properties of tumor cells, we can
distinguish CSCs from non-CSC,s and then provide potential strategies for cancer therapy.[10] Additionally, HIF-1α plays crucial roles in tumor angiogenesis, migration,
and chemoresistance[11] as well as in the transcriptional regulation of pluripotency transcription
factors, such as Oct-3/4, Nanog, and Sox2.[12] Another substantial impact on glioma resistance is the presence of glioma
stem cells (GSCs), which exhibit the characteristics of self-renewal and resistance
to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, including TMZ. GSCs are undifferentiated cells
that prefer a hypoxic microenvironment and may represent a novel therapeutic target
for chemo-radiotherapy-resistant malignant brain tumors. Finally, hypoxia was
reported to promote the stemness of GSCs, resulting in high resistance to
chemotherapy and radiotherapy.[13,14]Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy is the administration of 100% oxygen under elevated
atmospheric pressure. Currently, HBO is widely used as an adjunct treatment for
various tumors. A systemic review found that HBO treatment before irradiation
therapy improved survival rates, progression-free survival, time to progression, and
response rates.[15] The combination of HBO and TMZ synergistically enhanced apoptosis in the
glioma cell line U521 by altering the expression of VEGF and multidrug
resistance-associated protein-1.[16] Additionally, the synergistic effect of this combination therapy was
confirmed in a C6 ratglioma model.[17] Furthermore, HBO slows glioma growth and induces apoptosis in a model of
transplanted glioma in nude rats.[18] Nevertheless, the results from multiple studies exploring these associations
remain inconsistent and contradictory. In glioma cells, hypoxia was found to
upregulate the expression of stem cell markers, such as CD133, A2B5, Oct-4, and
Sox2[19,20] but
downregulate the expression of differentiation markers, such as glial fibrillary
acidic protein (GFAP).[11] This implies that hypoxia may induce the conversion of glioma cells into
cells consistent with tumorigenic GSCs. Moreover, HIF-1α can upregulate the
expression of Nanog,[12] a pluripotency transcription factor that contributes to reprogramming somatic
cells into an embryonic stem cell-like state. HBO treatment also increases
osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells by regulating Wnt3a
secretion and signaling.[21] Interestingly, several studies have shown that HBO treatment promotes neural
stem cell (NSC) proliferation,[21-25] which may lead to unintended
outcomes in gliomapatients with HBO treatment.The inconsistent and contradictory studies may relate to the timing of HBO treatment.
Additionally, the impact of HBO on GSCs remains unclear; therefore, it is important
to determine whether initial HBO treatment affects the stemness-associated
properties in glioma. Thus, this study aimed to explore the impact of initial HBO
treatment on the stemness of GSCs using an in vivo basal ganglia
glioma model. Here, we demonstrated for the first time that initial HBO treatment
affects the stemness-associated properties of glioma. Importantly we found that
initial HBO treatment downregulated Nanog and OSM expression but upregulated
β-catenin.
Materials and methods
Establishment of an in vivo basal ganglia glioma model
Six 12-week-old male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, weighing 250 to 280 g, were
purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Fudan University and housed in
a pathogen-free environment. Rats were kept in standard animal facilities (22°C;
55% relative humidity) and maintained under a 12:12-hour light:dark cycle with
water and food ad libitum. This study was approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Fudan University.Rats were anesthetized using 10% chloral hydrate (3.6 mL/kg) via intraperitoneal
injection. A midline incision was made into the head of each animal using a
stereotactic instrument (Alcbio Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) to expose the
coronal and sagittal sutures. Next, a 1-mm hole was drilled into the right
coronal suture 3 mm from the midline. RatC6 glioma cells (Cell Bank of Chinese
Academy of Science, Shanghai, China) were prepared and maintained in Dulbecco’s
Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine
serum (FBS), glutamax-1 and penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA,
USA). Subsequently, ratC6 glioma cells (1 × 106/10 µL) were injected
using a microinjector (Gaoge Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a
depth of 6 mm along the bone edge. The microinjector was then withdrawn
approximately 1 mm, and the cells were injected into the right caudate nucleus
of each rat at a rate of 1 µL/minute using a micro-infusion pump (Alcbio Co.,
Ltd.). After the cells were injected, the microinjector was kept in the brain
for 5 minutes and then slowly removed. Bone wax (Johnson & Johnson, New
Brunswick, NJ, USA) was used to seal the hole in the skull, and the wounds were
sutured. After surgery, all rats received 5% glucose in normal saline (2 mL) via
intraperitoneal injection.
HBO treatment
After glioma cells were inoculated, three SD rats were exposed to 100% oxygen at
3 atm for 1 hour in an animal hyperbaric chamber (DWC150/300; Yangyuan
Hyperabric Chamber Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
After 1 hour of HBO treatment, the pressure was decompressed to 1 atm within 15
minutes. In contrast, tumor-bearing animals in the control group were exposed to
normal atmospheric oxygen for 1 hour in an animal hyperbaric chamber. The
animals were then sacrificed using CO2 gas asphyxiation at 16 days
after inoculation, and glioma tissues were harvested from the right caudate
nucleus.
Examination of CD133 and A2B5 expression by flow cytometry
Surface expression of the CSC markers CD133 and A2B5 were examined and quantified
by flow cytometry analysis. After glioma tissue samples were harvested, single
cell suspensions were prepared by cutting the tissue into small pieces. The
minced tissue was trypsinized in 3 to 5 mL of pre-warmed 0.05% trypsin-EDTA for
10 to 15 minutes in a 37°C water bath. An equal volume of soybean trypsin
inhibitor in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS was added at the end of the
incubation period. After centrifugation at 220 × g for 5
minutes, the isolated cells were resuspended in 1 mL of sterile medium. The cell
surface markers CD133 and A2B5 were stained by fluorescein isothiocyanate
(FITC)-conjugated anti-CD133 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) antibodies and
allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-A2B5 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach,
Germany) antibodies. Subsequently, stained cells were subjected to flow
cytometry analysis to determine and quantify the surface expression CD133 and
A2B5. For negative control, isotype control IgG conjugated to Alexafluor 488
antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used.
Nuclear and cytosolic fractionation
Cytoplasmic and nuclear lysates were isolated from 40 mg of tissue using the
NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (78833; Thermo Scientific,
Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After
fractionation, the samples were kept on ice during the whole process, and
extracted samples were stored at −80°C until further use.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was used to determine protein levels of Oct-3/4, Nanog,
Sox2, Oct-3/4, Nestin, β-catenin, Nrf-2, β-actin, and TBP in glioma cells that
were isolated from tumors of the control and HBO groups. Briefly, glioma tissues
were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for later use or kept on
ice for immediate homogenization. For approximately 5 mg tissue, 300 µL of
ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5%
deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) was added and homogenized using an electric
homogenizer. This homogenization process was repeated twice with 300 µL of lysis
buffer and then maintained under constant agitation on an orbital shaker for 2
hours at 4°C, followed by centrifugation for 20 minutes at
16,000 × g at 4°C. Next, 30 µg of protein was separated by
10% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and
transferred on to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. After blocking
with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST)
for 1 hour at room temperature, membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with
the following primary antibodies: Oct-3/4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz,
CA, USA), Nanog (Abcam), Nestin (Abcam), Sox2 (Abcam), Nrf-2 (Abcam), TBP
(Abcam), and β-actin (Abcam). After washing twice with TBST, the membranes were
incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour at room
temperature, then blots were developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit
(Amersham, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).
Determining the concentration of TGF-β and OSM by ELISA
Approximately 5 mg of fresh tumor tissue was rapidly homogenized using an
electric homogenizer in 300 µL of ice-cold lysis buffer as previously described.[26] After centrifugation at 5000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C, the supernatant
was aliquoted and stored at −20°C (analysis was performed within 1 month) or at
2 to 8°C (analysis was performed within 24 hours). The concentration of TGF-β
and OSM were analyzed using the RatTGFb1 ELISA Kit (Abcam, ab119558) and Rat
OSM ELISA Kit (LS-F5508; LifeSpan BioSciences, Seattle, WA, USA), respectively
according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Statistical analysis
Statistical data are shown as mean ±standard deviation (SD) for control and HBO
groups and were compared using two-sample t-tests. All statistical assessments
were two-tailed, and p-values < 0.05 were considered
significantly different. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0
statistics software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
HBO treatment attenuated glioma stemness-associated properties in
vivo
To investigate whether HBO treatment affected the stemness of glioma, an
in vivo basal ganglia gliomarat model was established.
Glioma-bearing rats were then treated with HBO (HBO group) or normal atmospheric
oxygen (control group) for 1 hour, and glioma tissues were harvested and
analyzed. HBO treatment slightly reduced glioma tumor weights after 16 days of
inoculation (Figure 1).
To further understand whether initial HBO treatment affected the stemness of
glioma, the surface expression of the CSC markers CD133 and A2B5 were determined
and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of A2B5+ or
CD133+ cells were not significantly changed after HBO treatment
(Figure 2a). It was
worth noting that the percentage of A2B5+ CD133+ glioma
cells were significantly reduced (Figure 2b; p = 0.015), suggesting HBO
treatment might attenuate the stemness properties of glioma.
Figure 1.
Effect of initial HBO treatment on glioma tumor weight. After glioma
inoculation, rats were exposed to 100% oxygen at 3 atm for 1 hour on
days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. To examine the initial effect of HBO in
glioma, animals were sacrificed on day 16, and tumor weights were
measured. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.
Figure 2.
Initial HBO treatment attenuated the proportion of A2B5+
CD133+ glioma cells. (a) The surface cancer stem cell
markers A2B5 and CD133 were determined by flow cytometry. (b)The
proportions of A2B5+ CD133+ cells were quantified.
Data represent mean ± SD. Differences were found to be statistically
significant at *P < 0.05. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.
Effect of initial HBO treatment on glioma tumor weight. After glioma
inoculation, rats were exposed to 100% oxygen at 3 atm for 1 hour on
days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. To examine the initial effect of HBO in
glioma, animals were sacrificed on day 16, and tumor weights were
measured. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.Initial HBO treatment attenuated the proportion of A2B5+
CD133+ glioma cells. (a) The surface cancer stem cell
markers A2B5 and CD133 were determined by flow cytometry. (b)The
proportions of A2B5+ CD133+ cells were quantified.
Data represent mean ± SD. Differences were found to be statistically
significant at *P < 0.05. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.
HBO treatment downregulated Nanog and OSM expression and upregulated
TGF-β
To further understand whether HBO affected glioma stemness by regulating stem
cell-related transcriptional factors, western blot analysis was performed to
examine the expression of Nanog, Sox2, Oct-3/4, and Nestin (Figure 3a). Notably, HBO treatment
significantly attenuated the expression of Nanog (Figure 3b; p = 0.039). However, levels of
Sox2, Oct-3/4, and Nestin were not significantly changed between control and HBO
groups. As TGF-β and OSM play crucial roles in the stemness of glioma cells, we
next examined whether HBO treatment affected TGF-β and OSM expression. As shown
in Figure 3c, HBO
treatment significantly reduced OSM levels compared with control (111.81 ± 10.08
vs. 188.44 ± 6.72; p < 0.001). Additionally, TGF-β levels were increased in
glioma tumor tissues after HBO treatment (Figure 3d; 13043±1202.8 vs. 9820±530.16;
p = 0.013).
Figure 3.
Initial HBO treatment upregulated Nanog expression. (a) Glioma tissues
isolated from control or HBO-treated rats were homogenized, and the
extracted protein were subjected to western blot analysis to determine
the expression of Nanog, Sox2, Oct3/4, and Nestin. (b) Graph showing the
quantification of relative signal intensities of Nanog. Data represent
mean ± SD. Differences were considered statistically significant at
*P < 0.05. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.
Initial HBO treatment upregulated Nanog expression. (a) Glioma tissues
isolated from control or HBO-treated rats were homogenized, and the
extracted protein were subjected to western blot analysis to determine
the expression of Nanog, Sox2, Oct3/4, and Nestin. (b) Graph showing the
quantification of relative signal intensities of Nanog. Data represent
mean ± SD. Differences were considered statistically significant at
*P < 0.05. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen.
HBO increased β-catenin expression in a rat basal ganglia glioma
model
Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) is involved in the
quiescence, survival, and stress resistance of cancer stem cells.[27] Additionally, β-catenin signaling is involved in the stemness and early
differentiation of murine stem cells.[28] Therefore, we investigated whether HBO affected β-catenin expression. The
impact of HBO on β-catenin and Nrf-2 was evaluated by assessing cytosolic (Figure 4a) nuclear (Figure 4b) protein levels
by western blot analysis. As shown in Figure 5, HBO treatment upregulated
β-catenin expression in both cytosolic and nuclear fractions. However, there
were no significant differences in Nrf-2 levels. Taken together, HBO treatment
upregulated the expression of β-catenin in our rat basal ganglia glioma
model.
Figure 4.
Initial HBO treatment of the basal ganglia glioma model upregulated TGF-β
and downregulated OSM in vivo. Protein concentrations
of (a) TGF-β and (b) OSM were analyzed by ELISA. Data represent
mean ± SD. Differences were considered statistically significant at *P
< 0.05. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen; OSM, oncostatin M.
Figure 5.
Initial HBO treatment increased β-catenin expression in both nuclear and
cytosolic fractions in the rat basal ganglia glioma model. Glioma
tissues isolated from control or HBO-treated rats were homogenized, and
extracted proteins were subjected to nuclear and cytosolic
fractionation. Western blotting was used to determine the expression of
Nrf-2 and β-catenin. β-actin was used as an internal control for
cytosolic proteins. TBP was used as an internal control for nuclear
proteins. Relative band intensities of β-catenin are shown. HBO,
hyperbaric oxygen.
Initial HBO treatment of the basal ganglia glioma model upregulated TGF-β
and downregulated OSM in vivo. Protein concentrations
of (a) TGF-β and (b) OSM were analyzed by ELISA. Data represent
mean ± SD. Differences were considered statistically significant at *P
< 0.05. HBO, hyperbaric oxygen; OSM, oncostatin M.Initial HBO treatment increased β-catenin expression in both nuclear and
cytosolic fractions in the rat basal ganglia glioma model. Glioma
tissues isolated from control or HBO-treated rats were homogenized, and
extracted proteins were subjected to nuclear and cytosolic
fractionation. Western blotting was used to determine the expression of
Nrf-2 and β-catenin. β-actin was used as an internal control for
cytosolic proteins. TBP was used as an internal control for nuclear
proteins. Relative band intensities of β-catenin are shown. HBO,
hyperbaric oxygen.
Discussion
The current treatment for malignant glioma is surgical resection followed by adjuvant
chemo-radiotherapy. During glioma progression or after therapeutic treatment, the
necrotic area of glioblastoma develops into a hypoxia region, which promotes tumor
development, angiogenesis, and recurrence. Recently, it has been reported that
combining adjuvant HBO with therapeutic compounds or radiotherapy has synergistic
effects on glioma treatment.[16,17,29] However, several studies have demonstrated a different
observation: that adjuvant HBO promotes glioma cell growth, neural stem cell
proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal
cells.[21,30,31] Thus, we investigated the impact of initial HBO on the stemness
of glioma cells using an in vivo basal ganglia model. The results
of our in vivo study demonstrated that HBO treatment attenuated
glioma stemness-associated properties. HBO treatment began to affect the gliomatumor weight after 16 days of inoculation. Importantly, the glioma stem cell markers
A2B5 and CD133 were dramatically reduced in HBO-treated glioma tissues. Furthermore,
HBO treatment downregulated Nanog and OSM expression, which are both involved in the
self-renewal and pluripotency of stem cells. β-catenin expression, which is involved
in the stemness and early differentiation of murine stem cells, was increased after
HBO treatment. Taken together, these data suggest that in vivo HBO
treatment can affect glioma stemness-associated properties and suppress glioblastoma
stemness in an orthotopic glioma model.It is interesting to observe that HBO treatment slightly reduced the glioma tumor
weight in our basal ganglia rat model. The slight decrease of tumor weight may be
due to the effect of HBO treatment being analyzed 16 days after tumor inoculation.
This also indicated that short-term and repeated HBO treatment began to influence
tumor progression. Thus, it will be worthwhile to perform a long-term investigation
of the effect of HBO on glioma progression.As glioblastoma multiforme are aggressive malignant brain tumors and GSCs are
involved in neoplastic recurrence and patient survival, the CSC markers CD133 and
A2B5 were analyzed by flow cytometry to understand the characteristics of GSCs in
response to HBO. In gliomapatients, increased CD133 expression was associated with
poor prognosis.[32] Bao et al.[33] demonstrated that CD133-positive glioma tumor cells conferred resistance to
radiotherapy and may be associated with tumor recurrence. Additionally, cancer stem
cell properties were observed in A2B5+ humanglioblastoma.[7,34] The expression of A2B5 in
humanglioblastomas was associated with chemoresistance.[35] Thus, glioma cells with both A2B5 and CD133 expression are considered GSCs.
In contrast, A2B5+, CD133+, and
A2B5−CD133− cells are considered glioma cells.
Interestingly, our study found that the proportion of
A2B5+CD133+ cells was dramatically reduced after HBO
treatment (Figure 2).
However, the proportion of A2B5+ or CD133+ cells were not
reduced in the HBO-treated group. This implied that glioma stem cells
(A2B5+CD133+ cells) were more sensitive to HBO treatment
than glioma cells (A2B5+ or CD133+ cells).We hypothesized that HBO treatment would force GSCs to escape from a quiescent state
and differentiate into a glioma-associated phenotype. In other words, HBO treatment
may decrease the stemness of GSCs or reduce the number of GSCs, thereby increasing
the sensitivity of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.It has been reported that hypoxia increases the self-renewal capacity of GSCs as well
as non-stem cells.[36] Hypoxia upregulated the expression of Oct-4, Nanog, and c-myc; however, it is
unclear whether short-term and repeated HBO treatment alters the stemness of GSCs.
Thus, rats were analyzed after 4 days of HBO treatment. Interestingly, we observed
that HBO treatment reduced Nanog expression, while levels of Sox2, Oct-3/4, and
Nestin were not significantly changed. This indicated that the expression of Nanog
in glioma began to decrease after 4 days of HBO treatment, and the decreased
expression of Nanog in HBO-treated glioma tissues suggested that HBO began to
suppress glioblastoma stemness. Thus, long-term observations in future studies will
be required to examine the expression of other stemness factors and their
association with phenotypic changes, such as glioma cell proliferation and
invasion.In this study, HBO treatment increased TGF-β levels, similar to a previous study
conducted in a rat model of traumatic brain injury.[37] TGF-β-responsive SMADs can bind to the proximal promoter of Nanog, thereby
regulating its expression in human embryonic stem cells.[38] Inhibition of TGF-β signaling by small-molecule inhibitor induced Nanog expression.[39] In contrast, hypoxia-induced Nanog expression directly binds to the proximal
promoter of TGF-β1,[40] indicating that the regulatory mechanisms between TGF-β and Nanog are
different under different conditions. Thus, further studies are necessary to fully
elucidate the role of TGF-β in HBO-treated gliomas and the relationship with Nanog
expression.OSM regulates the proliferation and differentiation of glioma cells.[41] In human proximal tubule cells, OSM attenuated TGF-β-induced expression of
FoXC2, CTGF, TNC, TSP-1, and SPARC,[41,42] implying that OSM negatively
regulates TGF-β expression. In this study, initial HBO treatment significantly
reduced OSM expression (Figure
4b, p < 0.001), inhibited stemness-associated properties (Figure 2 and 3) and began to reduce tumor
weights (Figure 1).
Consistently, we found that HBO treatment upregulated TGF-β (Figure 4a). Thus, it is likely that initial
HBO treatment upregulated TGF-β expression by inhibiting OSM in our orthotopic
glioma model, which warrants further investigation. Conversely, several
studies[43-45] have reported
a positive role for TGF-β in promoting or sustaining stemness in various types of
malignant cancer tumor-initiating cells, including glioma.[46,47] You et al.[43] demonstrated that TGF-β upregulated CD133 expression, and thus increased
tumor initiation in Huh7hepatocellular carcinoma cells. However, our results found
that initial HBO treatment did upregulate TGF-β expression, but the proportion of
CD133+ cells did not change significantly, suggesting that another
unknown mechanism affected TGF-β-induced CD133 upregulation. It may be that initial
HBO treatment had not begun to upregulate CD133 expression at the time of our
analysis. CD133 expression may be increased after longer HBO treatment. It is
worthwhile to investigate whether and how HBO-inhibited OSM expression upregulated
TGF-β expression in the orthotopic glioma model. Additionally, future studies will
be necessary to determine if longer HBO treatment increases CD133 expression and to
elucidate the underlying regulatory mechanism.In conclusion, this study emphasized that initial HBO treatment attenuated GSC
stemness. Initial HBO treatment began to attenuate glioma stemness-associated
properties, including a reduced proportion of A2B5+CD133+
cells and decreased Nanog and OSM expression. Thus, initial HBO treatment reduces
glioma stemness and increases sensitivity to therapeutic compounds and/or
radiotherapy.
Authors: Shideng Bao; Qiulian Wu; Roger E McLendon; Yueling Hao; Qing Shi; Anita B Hjelmeland; Mark W Dewhirst; Darell D Bigner; Jeremy N Rich Journal: Nature Date: 2006-10-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ren-He Xu; Tori L Sampsell-Barron; Feng Gu; Sierra Root; Ruthann M Peck; Guangjin Pan; Junying Yu; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Shulan Tian; Ron Stewart; James A Thomson Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2008-08-07 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Marta Scorsetti; Pierina Navarria; Federico Pessina; Anna Maria Ascolese; Giuseppe D'Agostino; Stefano Tomatis; Fiorenza De Rose; Elisa Villa; Giulia Maggi; Matteo Simonelli; Elena Clerici; Riccardo Soffietti; Armando Santoro; Luca Cozzi; Lorenzo Bello Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: L Persano; F Pistollato; E Rampazzo; A Della Puppa; S Abbadi; C Frasson; F Volpin; S Indraccolo; R Scienza; G Basso Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 8.469