Literature DB >> 31813057

Quick bonding using a universal adhesive.

Mohammed H Ahmed1,2, Kumiko Yoshihara3,4, Benjamin Mercelis1, Kirsten Van Landuyt1, Marleen Peumans1, Bart Van Meerbeek5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to measure the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a new universal adhesive (UA) bonded to dentin following a quick bonding mode.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experimental UA 'SKB-100,' now commercialized as Clearfil Universal Bond Quick ('C-UBq'; Kuraray Noritake), was investigated, with Scotchbond Universal ('SBU'; 3M Oral Care) and the two-step self-etch (SE) adhesive Clearfil SE Bond 2 ('C-SE2'; Kuraray Noritake) serving as references. The adhesives were employed separately in etch&rinse (E&R) and SE modes on each tooth half following a split-tooth design and following their respective instructions for use, except for C-UBq that besides the manufacturer's instructed quick bonding mode was also applied and left untouched for 20 s prior to light curing ('C-UBq_20s') and for C-SE2 that was also applied in the E&R mode. μTBS of half of the specimens was measured upon 1 week (1w), with the other half tested after 6-month (6m) storage in distilled water at 37 °C. Data were statistically analyzed using linear mixed-effects modeling and three-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). The adhesive-dentin interfaces were ultrastructurally characterized by TEM.
RESULTS: C-UBq revealed a significantly lower μTBS than C-SE2. The highest μTBS was recorded for C-UBq_20s_1w and C-SE2_1w, both when applied in E&R mode. However, μTBS of C-UBq_20s significantly decreased upon aging in both modes. C-SE2 presented the significantly highest 'aged' μTBS.
CONCLUSION: C-UBq applied in the quick bonding mode did not underperform to the UAs applied for 20 s. Superior bonding effectiveness was achieved by C-SE2 in SE and E&R bonding modes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Extended application time of C-UBq improved solely its immediate but not aged bonding effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bond strength; Durability; Interface; Linear mixed-effects model (LME); TEM

Year:  2019        PMID: 31813057     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03149-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  5 in total

1.  Adhesive sonic agitation improves bonding durability to class-II cavity preparation.

Authors:  Mohamed M Awad; Feras Alhalabi; Mohamed Bamuqadm; Abdulmalik Alhoti; Abdulilah Almasaad; Ali Robiaan; Ahmed Almahdy; Ali Alrahlah; Mohammed H Ahmed
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.885

Review 2.  Scoping review of trials evaluating adhesive strategies in pediatric dentistry: where do simplified strategies lie?

Authors:  António H S Delgado; Hasan Jamal; Anne Young; Paul Ashley
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 3.  Traditional Microscopic Techniques Employed in Dental Adhesion Research-Applications and Protocols of Specimen Preparation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Nawrocka; Ireneusz Piwonski; Salvatore Sauro; Annalisa Porcelli; Louis Hardan; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-21

Review 4.  Role of the smear layer in adhesive dentistry and the clinical applications to improve bonding performance.

Authors:  Pipop Saikaew; Vanthana Sattabanasuk; Choltacha Harnirattisai; Abu Faem Mohammad Almas Chowdhury; Ricardo Carvalho; Hidehiko Sano
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a new universal adhesive applied in the "no-waiting" technique: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rossana Aboud Matos de Almeida; Suellen Nogueira Linares Lima; Maria Vitória Nassif; Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos; Thalita Paris de Matos; Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez; Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas; Matheus Coelho Bandeca; Alessandro D Loguercio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.606

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.